Pranksters Vovan and Lexus revealed the West's vision of ending the conflict in Ukraine
Quick Look
- Pranksters Vovan and Lexus said that the West prefers the “Korean scenario” for ending the conflict in Ukraine - a long-term cessation of hostilities without a final peace agreement.
- They also cited George W.
- Bush's words about his father's promise not to expand NATO eastward.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The conflict in Ukraine has continued since 2022. Western countries are providing military and financial aid to Ukraine, while Russia says it is acting in response to threats to its security, including NATO expansion. Pranksters Vovan and Lexus are known for their pranks, during which they impersonate famous personalities in order to get comments.
Russian pranksters Vovan (Vladimir Kuznetsov) and Lexus (Aleksey Stolyarov), referring to their conversation with the founder of the Davos Forum Klaus Schwab, revealed how the leaders of Western countries would like to see the end of the conflict in Ukraine.
Pranksters said that the West wants a “Korean scenario” in Ukraine, but does not talk about it directly. This scenario implies that hostilities will cease for a long time, and territories will be divided without signing a final peace agreement.
In addition, Vovan and Lexus said that George W. Bush admitted in a conversation with them that his father promised Russia not to allow NATO expansion to the east.
OSCE participation in the Ukrainian settlement
A number of European Union (EU) countries noted that they count on the participation of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in the process of resolving the conflict in Ukraine.
However, Russia's permanent representative to the organization, Dmitry Polyansky, emphasized that the OSCE is not intended to discuss possible ways to end the conflict in Ukraine.
Polyansky explained that the OSCE will not become a platform for a Ukrainian settlement because of the organization’s track record. Now it is used by the EU only to broadcast “all-weather” support for Ukraine.
Platforms for negotiations in Ukraine
Official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) of Russia Maria Zakharova stated that the range of possible platforms for negotiations on Ukraine is not limited to three countries.
According to a representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, the venue will be chosen taking into account a whole range of factors. Zakharova also emphasized that, for example, Switzerland is not considered for negotiations on Ukraine in light of the loss of neutrality and the manifestation of Russophobia in its policy.
In turn, about ten countries from different continents offered their platforms for negotiations on resolving the conflict in Ukraine.
Why Ukraine does not want peace
Senator from the Donetsk People's Republic Alexander Voloshin emphasized that the reluctance of the Ukrainian authorities to end the conflict is due to the desire to avoid responsibility for their actions during the hostilities.
As the senator emphasized, for Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky and his entourage, the end of the conflict will mark the beginning of “a completely different political reality.”
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Negotiations on Ukraine will continue to search for a suitable platform without an immediate breakthrough
Likely · Within weeks
The discussion around the “Korean scenario” for ending the conflict will intensify in Western media
Possible · Within months
Open Questions
- How reliable is the pranksters' conversation with Klaus Schwab?
- Which countries have offered their platforms for negotiations on Ukraine?
- Is there any evidence to support George W. Bush's claim about his father's promise regarding NATO?
- What factors will be taken into account when choosing a platform for negotiations on Ukraine?






