The system of counterweights of American democracy stops the triumphalist speech of the former president after the midterm elections
AI-generated summary
The article is set in the context of Donald Trump's second term and the midterm elections, where he loses control of both chambers of Congress. He refers to The Federalist Papers of Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay as the foundation of the system of checks and balances of American democracy.
Predictions are risky, especially when you try to predict the future. Little did Donald Trump think that in the first two years of his second term he would lose control of both chambers of Congress. The polls already foreshadowed this, but he was sure of the winner's argument that he had created with lies and half-truths.
North American democracy has many imperfections, but its system of checks and balances has made it the longest and still the most solid in the world.
Alexander Hamilton was one of the inspirers of the Constitution, along with James Madison and John Jay. In The Federalist Papers they wrote that “democracy does not consist of entrusting all power to those who win the elections, but rather establishing limits so that no one can exercise it without controls.”
For this, it is necessary that any public power has to be accountable and audited by voters periodically. If men were angels, no government would be necessary, Hamilton wrote.
Trump will not change his triumphalist speech or his contempt for critical journalism. But his defeat in the midterm elections is due to propaganda, false words and half-truths. The “alternative reality” is pure virtuality. It doesn't exist.
Politics in democracy is not a set of brilliant stories prepared in communication offices, but rather knowing how to manage the conflicting interests of citizens. With facts, with budgets, with kept promises and with civilized treatment with the adversary or the different one. The humiliation of Zelensky has not been erased from the global imagination.
Trump will pay for the errors and excesses committed in foreign policy by treating authoritarian regimes as friends and allies as pariahs. The war against Iran has hit people's pockets and the rude treatment of its critics is not part of the mood of the American people.
Elon Musk criticizes Trump's management after leaving the Department of Government Efficiency, lamenting that the second term agenda forgot the middle classes and that presidential corruption made it impossible to digest his management. Musk spent $500 million on the election, and Democrat James Talarico won Texas after thirty years without a non-Republican senator in the state.
The article analyzes how the economy, and not international politics, determined the vote in the US. It points out that Trump aggravated inflation with tariffs on April 2, 2025, caused stock market falls and a war with Iran that made fuel more expensive, and concludes that voters punish when their pocketbooks are affected.

The article analyzes how the election results in the US reflect citizen concern about the real economy and the cost of living, overcoming traditional political narratives and highlighting the importance of democratic recognition between rivals.

Óscar Puente recognizes that a minister cannot continue in his position with two serious accidents, although he should have reached that conclusion on the day of the Urda accident. The article criticizes his management and points out that he will go down in history for leading the most tragic period of the railway in Spain.

An opinion column reflects on the unexpected death in football and the impossibility of explaining it, refusing to find culprits and sending a message of pain and support to the family of Jesús de Miguel and Club Deportivo Tenerife, from its president Felipe Miñambres to the last fan.

The debate over global imbalances has evolved from a macroeconomic concern to a question of national security and sectoral competitiveness, marked by China's manufacturing dominance and the West's protectionist response.