
Julio Martínez Martínez testifies before Judge Calama in the framework of the Plus Ultra case
Julio Martínez Martínez, linked to former president José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, testified before Judge José Luis Calama in the Plus Ultra case and denied having taken steps before the SEPI to achieve the rescue of the airline for 53 million euros.
AI-generated summary
The Plus Ultra case investigates the airline's public bailout and possible kickbacks.
- Judge José Luis Calama: Do you receive a lot of money from Plus Ultra for peddling influence with the authorities and officials of the Sepi or higher up? What exactly do you do to receive that enormous amount of money?
- Julio Martínez Martínez: Your Honor, I inform President Zapatero that these have presented themselves [to receive the aid]. I don't know what President Zapatero does. There have been some meetings that I don't know about, really, I don't know about all of them, and they tell me what they are doing, but what was done with the SEPI or with whoever, really, I don't know.
EL MUNDO has accessed the full statement of Julio Martínez Julito, the paymaster of former president José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero in the framework of the Plus Ultra case. In his extensive appearance before the magistrate investigating the case, the businessman denied knowing what were the steps that allegedly led to the plot to collect a bribe for closing the rescue of the airline through a public credit of 53 million euros.
According to Zapatero's front man, the directors of Plus Ultra - and especially its president, Julio Martínez Sola - spoke with Relevant Analysis "with some regularity", informing them "of the movements that are being made." "From the first moment La Caixa and [Banco] Santander say no, and they continue looking for their financing line. And they find this fund," the accused continues.
"And then you intervene to make arrangements regarding this issue," says Calama. "It's not like that," answers Zapatero's figurehead. And asked about the dates on which the interactions began due to the issue of the background, Julito claims not to remember it.
- If the company met the requirements of the ministerial order that was issued, in principle they did not need you. Unless what you did were negotiations with the SEPI or with other types of officials or authorities. Exactly on this topic, what do you do?
- I'm going to tell you the same thing and you're not going to like it, your honor. This is a company that is crazy for financing. They have a great team, all administrative tasks or any type of work was done by them. What is done is to inform us and I, obviously, in my regularity I inform President Zapatero, but there is no periodicity of what they are doing.
During the interrogation, the head of position number 4 of the Investigation Section of the National Court asks the businessman about the 1% billing they charged, as reflected in a document presented by Roberto Roselli, former CEO of the airline and also accused in the case.
Calama points out that the concepts that appear in the invoices of the instrumental companies among which the payment of the bribe was diversified - Análisis Relevante (AR), Voli Analítico SL and IOT Domotic Europe SL - are "uncertain." He makes an inferential judgment about them, pointing out that it appears from them that, in effect, they charged a commission.

The Prosecutor's Office of the National Court has asked to revoke again the third degree granted to former ETA chief Juan Antonio Olarra Guridi by the Basque Government, citing the scant reparation for the damage and the seriousness of his terrorist crimes.

The Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court has declared the criminal responsibility of the 1-O leaders Oriol Junqueras, Dolors Bassa, Jordi Turull and Raül Romeva extinguished in application of the Amnesty Law, after assuming the protection of the Constitutional Court.

The Supreme Court has declared the criminal responsibility of the 1-O leaders Oriol Junqueras, Dolors Bassa, Jordi Turull and Raül Romeva extinguished in application of the Amnesty Law, after accepting the ruling of the Constitutional Court.

Former magistrate Luis Sáenz de Tejada has sent a letter to Judge Santiago Pedraz denying having followed Judge Beatriz Biedma. The accused claims to be 450 km away on the day of the events, providing geolocation evidence and witnesses.

The judge of the National Court María Tardón has ordered new proceedings on the wave of immigrants in Ceuta, summoning three regional councilors and three police officers to testify and bothering the Army, the Interior and the Autonomous City with documentation.

The legal service of the Constitutional Court proposes to reject the Ombudsman's appeal for protection against the suspension of the 'grandchildren law', considering it premature for not exhausting the previous judicial route.