
AI-generated summary
In September last year, Jiang Zuping posted on social media to expose the incident of sexual assault, secret filming and drugging by TV station personnel. Later, he released a mosaic photo of the perpetrator and filed a lawsuit. In June, the prosecutor charged Gong Yiting with the crime of forced sexual intercourse but did not prosecute him for the drugging part.
2026/10/13 13:04
Gong Yiting was accused of drugging and sexually assaulting a female artist. (File photo)
[Reporter Weng Jingyou/Taipei Report] Gong Yiting, the son of former senior deputy general manager of Sanli TV Gong Meifu, was accused by a female artist of sexually assaulting her with a sedative and was sued. Before filing the lawsuit, the female artist contacted Gong Nan's mother, Zhao Ruyu, through messaging software. Today, the Taipei District Court held another hearing and summoned Gong Nan to court. The judge arranged in court that the conversation record between the female artist and Gong's mother on the messaging software will be examined in the future.
The whole case stems from Jiang Zuping's post on social media in September last year, revealing that TV station personnel sexually assaulted, secretly filmed, and even took off the actress' clothes and filmed the video after taking a sedative. After the actress woke up, she deleted all the videos in anger, but the man replied, "Delete! I have a cloud."
Please read on...
At first, Jiang Zuping did not disclose the name of the perpetrator, but after the incident broke out, she first posted a mosaic photo of the perpetrator's front, and said that the man refused to buy contraceptive pills for the victim afterwards, and the man's identity was immediately recognized by the public. Afterwards, Jiang Zuping filed a lawsuit, and the prosecutors charged Gong with forced sexual intercourse in June this year. However, regarding the drugging part, the prosecutors determined that there was no specific evidence and therefore did not prosecute.
The victimized female artist subsequently applied to the court to participate in the lawsuit. She requested to participate in the lawsuit in order to state her opinions during the investigation of evidence and the defense of the defendant. After consulting the opinions of the two parties, the judge believed that the female artist's petition was justified and allowed the petition. On September 8 this year, the female artist was summoned to appear in court, and the hearing was conducted via separate video conference.
☆Respect body autonomy, be brave enough to stop sexual harassment and say no, please call 113 or 110☆
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The court will examine the conversation records between the female artist and Gong’s mother on communication software to verify the drugging accusation
Very likely · Within weeks
If the conversation record confirms the drugging, the prosecutor may add additional charges or amend the indictment.
Possible · Within months

The Zhuhai Special Economic Zone Construction Waste Management Regulations will be implemented on October 15, 2026. For the first time, a special chapter is set up for the management of decoration waste. It is clear that the generating units and individuals need to notify the manager in advance, classify the collection, entrust the removal and pay the fee. It is prohibited to mix domestic waste or dump and pile it without authorization. Violators will face penalties such as warnings, fines, and even detention.

Former Yilan District Court judge Zhang Xuanhao was dismissed from his duties as a judge for the first time due to three drunk driving accidents. After being transferred to a judicial affairs officer, he drove drunk again and injured a passerby. The disciplinary court ordered him to suspend his duties for one year, and he can appeal.

Justices Cai Zongzhen, Yang Huiqin, and Zhu Fumei of the Judicial Yuan have long refused to participate in the review, but issued "disagreement with the legal opinion" in the name of the justices and authorized legal sources to pay for inclusion, triggering a Facebook debate between lawyer Fan Guohua and copyright expert Zhang Zhongxin. Fan Guohua questioned whether he was abusing public resources by using his job title for publishing and charging without comment, citing the analogy of the 33 yuan electric cooker case; Zhang Zhongxin believed that the document was a personal creation and the use of job titles was a separate issue. The two sides debated the ownership of documents and the appropriateness of their positions, involving copyright, the distinction between public and private matters, and official ethics.

83-year-old Ms. Fang was forced to accept the arbitration clause after the fund company’s app was upgraded, otherwise she would not be able to use the app. The court found that this coercive method violated the principle of voluntary arbitration, and the arbitration agreement was not effective for investors. It upheld the first-instance ruling that rejected the fund company manager’s objection.

Justices Cai Zongzhen, Yang Huiqin and Zhu Fumei refused to participate in the deliberations of the Constitutional Court for more than 300 days, but later expressed their personal opinions in the form of a "Legal Opinion of Disagreement", which was published in the magazine "Taiwan Lawyer" and authorized to be downloaded by Fayuan Legal Network for a fee. This triggered controversy over judicial ethics and copyright. Fayuan.com has removed the relevant article, and other legal circles have reported and requested investigation.

Justices Cai Zongzhen, Yang Huiqin and Zhu Fumei refused to participate in the deliberations of the Constitutional Court, but issued legal opinions with the title of justice and authorized paid downloads. They were reported to the Judicial Yuan by members of the legal profession. Scholars Zhang Jiayin and Su Yantu criticized his behavior as violating judge ethics and confusing private comments with formal judgment opinions, which may weaken the authority of the Constitutional Court and affect the fairness of the trial.