
William Lacks alleges wrongful termination, harassment, and retaliation by his former IT team leader.
William Lacks, a former IT support engineer, has sued The Walt Disney Co. and Capgemini America Inc. in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging racial discrimination, harassment, and wrongful termination by his Latino team leader.
AI-generated summary
William Lacks was hired as an IT support engineer in 2017 and worked at Disney Studios in Burbank. He alleges he was the only Black employee in his specific group.
A Black former employee has filed a lawsuit against The Walt Disney Co. and digital information provider Capgemini America Inc., alleging that his Latino IT team leader made inappropriate workplace remarks about Black people and favored staff members of his own race.
William Lacks filed the action in Los Angeles Superior Court, stating he worked for both companies. His allegations include wrongful termination, racial discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and both intentional and negative infliction of emotional distress. Lacks is seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
A Disney representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the lawsuit, which was filed on Friday.
Lacks was hired in 2017 as an IT support engineer and worked at Disney Studios in Burbank. He was the only Black employee within the technology studio and administrative services group.
According to the suit, Lacks was subjected to racial harassment, hostility, and exclusion beginning in March 2025 and continuing through his termination. The filing states that the team leader openly declared that he did not trust Black people and, alongside a co-worker, regularly made racially derogatory jokes and remarks about Blacks.
The team leader allegedly refused to collaborate with Lacks or accept his assistance, instead directing work and support tickets to newer Latino employees. The lawsuit also alleges that Lacks was excluded from team conversations, communications, and activities.
The lawsuit alleges Lacks was unduly assigned heavy physical work and tasked with a full studio inventory inspection across the projector, conference, screening, review, and editing rooms. The heavy lifting eventually left the plaintiff with a hernia, the suit states.
Additionally, Lacks was removed from working red-carpet events and the associated overtime he had previously worked. His supervisor allegedly laughed when informed of the team leader's alleged racism and protected the offender rather than addressing the issues Lacks raised, the suit contends.
Lacks was let go in November 2025 without warning or progressive discipline, and management said nothing to him regarding poor job performance. He believes he lost his job because he complained about the alleged workplace discrimination. The plaintiff has suffered lost wages and emotional distress, the suit further states.

A Utah judge is expected to decide whether Tyler Robinson will face trial on an aggravated murder charge with possible death penalty eligibility for the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

Judge Paul Engelmayer has rejected Ghislaine Maxwell's latest attempt to challenge her conviction for sex trafficking. With legal avenues nearly exhausted, observers are debating the possibility of a presidential pardon from Donald Trump, despite political risks.

A federal judge in California ruled that the Trump administration violated the constitutional rights of international students by attempting to deport them for criticizing Israel's war on Gaza, stating that freedom of speech belongs to the people and is not the government's to take.
The FBI is shifting from an automatic hiring ban to a case-by-case review for applicants who have engaged in prostitution. While the agency maintains strict boundaries for recent or frequent conduct, the change aims to accommodate context and address recruitment challenges.

Four Black IHOP employees in Pompano Beach, Florida, filed a lawsuit alleging continuous racial slurs, intimidation, and sexual harassment by a shift manager, followed by retaliation and termination after reporting the abuse.

A US federal judge ruled that the Pentagon's 'supply chain risk' label on AI firm Anthropic was an act of retaliation for the company's refusal to allow unrestricted military use of its technology and its public criticism of the government.