Former Huobi Senior Manager Acquitted of Moving $5 Million in Tether
Hong Kong High Court jury finds insufficient evidence in case involving dark pool trading allegations
Quick Look
- A former senior manager at Huobi (now HTX) has been acquitted by a Hong Kong court of secretly moving about US$5 million in Tether stablecoins to his own accounts in 2020.
- A seven-member High Court jury reached a majority verdict on Friday, finding insufficient evidence to prove the defendant controlled an account registered under the alias "Chen Feng".
- The prosecution alleged Chen Boliang used the alias account and three company accounts to trade in the dark pool between February 27 and March 14, 2020.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
This was a criminal case involving allegations of a former cryptocurrency exchange employee misusing company accounts for personal trading. Dark pool trading allows institutional investors to trade privately without public disclosure of transactions.
A former senior manager at a major Chinese cryptocurrency exchange has been acquitted by a Hong Kong court of secretly moving about US$5 million in Tether stablecoins, worth around HK$39 million, to his own accounts six years ago. A seven-member High Court jury reached the verdict on Friday to find Chen Boliang, who used to work at cryptocurrency firm Huobi – now known as HTX – not guilty of accessing its platform to trade in the dark pool under an individual account he created with an alias between February 27 and March 14, 2020. Dark pool trading involves institutional investors trading privately without publicly disclosing the transactions, the buy and sell prices and the number of shares traded. Prosecutors alleged that Chen set up a Huobi account under the name of "Chen Feng" in January 2020. One month later, Chen began using that individual account, which was registered with a mainland identification card, and three other company accounts over which he had control on Huobi to trade in the dark pool. After a day of deliberation, the jury returned a majority verdict finding insufficient evidence to prove that the defendant was the controller of the Chen Feng account, as evidence showed that his accounts on other crypto exchanges – Binance and OKX – had received a large number of cryptocurrency transfers from the Huobi accounts over the period in question.
Open Questions
- Why did the jury find the evidence insufficient?
- Were there any other suspects or accomplices?
- Will the prosecution appeal the verdict?





