AI-generated summary
The district court originally acquitted the man when they questioned the woman's story. The Court of Appeal has now made a different assessment of the evidence.
Despite the fact that the suspect did not answer questions or provide incorrect information, the district court chose to acquit him of the charge of rape. In the district court verdict, the court took into account, among other things, that the young woman gave different details about the rape to different people and did not immediately report the rape.
Asked to report
The two young people met at a shopping center after having a brief contact on social media. The woman states that he committed abuse and that she could not get away from the scene. Among other things, the man's friends are said to have been nearby. On a later occasion, he is said to have come to her school, where he himself had been a student before. That's when she tells school staff what happened and is asked to report it to the police.
The Court of Appeal notes that she has given a long and vivid story and that she has given reasonable explanations for the various details. She is considered trustworthy.
According to the Court of Appeal, the man essentially said that he was not at the scene. He is sentenced to the minimum sentence for rape, three years and to pay 240,000 kroner in damages to the woman.
According to the organization Mansfrid, around 400,000 men are exposed to violence in close relationships every year. Despite the scale, police reports are few and only eight percent of reported cases of assault led to prosecution last year.

A 50-year-old Ukrainian man is being charged in Hamburg with war crimes linked to the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines in September 2022, where he is suspected of using a false identity and chartering a yacht to carry out the attack. The trial began in front of over a hundred journalists and is expected to last for a long time with 16 scheduled occasions.
A man conscripted in Norrbotten is acquitted of charges of unlawful invasion of privacy after filming intercourse. The district court believes that spreading to five people does not meet the law's requirements for the crime. The prosecutor has appealed the sentence.

The Swedish Consumer Agency has submitted an application against Leo's Lekland, which is not considered to have remedied serious safety deficiencies at two facilities, which meant a risk of serious personal injury.

The Svea Court of Appeal has decided not to introduce forced administration of six apartment buildings in Vårberg. The court acknowledges shortcomings in the administration but considers that they are not sufficient for coercive measures, which has drawn strong criticism from the Tenants' Association and the residents.

The National Audit Office has reviewed the role of judges in Swedish courts. The report points to the need for longer training, better knowledge of jurors and increased opportunities for courts to check jurors' compliance with the law during the current term of office.