
Home Office data reveals 3,021 terror-related arrests in the year ending 31 March 2026, driven largely by the proscription of Palestine Action.
Almost half of all terrorism arrests in Great Britain since 9/11 occurred in the past year, with Home Office data showing 3,021 arrests in the year ending March 2026, coinciding with the proscription of protest group Palestine Action.
AI-generated summary
Palestine Action was proscribed under the Terrorism Act, leading to a surge in arrests of protesters demonstrating against the ban.
Almost half of all terrorism arrests in Great Britain since the 9/11 attacks on the twin towers in 2001 have come in the past year, official data shows.
There have been 6,539 arrests for terror-related activity in Great Britain since the 2001 attacks and 3,021 of those arrests were in the year ending 31 March 2026, according to the Home Office.
The increase coincides with the proscription of Palestine Action, which came into effect on 5 July last year and has led to thousands of arrests of people for allegedly supporting the direct action protest group, the first such group to be banned under the Terrorism Act.
The ban, which has been criticised by UN experts, NGOs, a former director of public prosecutions and a former director of the security services, is the subject of a continuing legal challenge, which will next be heard at the UK supreme court on 4 November.
Ruth Ehrlich, the director of external relations at Liberty, which intervened in the legal challenge, said: “The staggering increase in arrests over the past year is the clearest indicator that the UK’s counter-terror laws are not fit for purpose.
“The government’s current definition of terrorism is so wide-ranging it captures behaviour most people would never consider terrorism. When it’s not clear what counts as terrorism, public trust collapses and without trust, counter-terror laws simply won’t work.
“This data underscores the urgent need to update the current definition of terrorism to enable current and future governments to uphold their duty to safeguard the public whilst protecting people’s rights and preventing overreach.”
The proscription led to a mass civil disobedience campaign with most of those arrested at demonstrations organised by Defend Our Juries (DOJ), where they held up placards saying: “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.”
Terrorism-related arrests were up 1,434% in the year ending 31 March compared with the previous 12 months. There was also a 3,761% increase in women and girls arrested and a 2,306% increase in arrests of those aged 30 and over. Earlier, this year, Raj Chada, the head of criminal defence at the law firm Hodge Jones and Allen, said: “The most common terrorist in the UK at present is a pensioner at a silent vigil holding a placard.”
DOJ says the number of arrests relating to support for Palestine Action, which targets UK entities it claims to be complicit in Israeli genocide against Palestinians, has since risen to more than 3,600, which would be over half of the arrests since 9/11.
About 2,500 people have been charged under section 13 of the Terrorism Act, which prohibits showing support for a terrorism group and carries a maximum sentence of six months in prison. DOJ says at least 50 people have been charged under section 12, which concerns inviting support for a banned group, must be heard by a jury and carries a maximum sentence of 14 years.
A DOJ spokesperson said: “These shocking statistics expose the true nature of how the British government uses terror laws. Since July 2025, thousands of peaceful protesters have been arrested under the Terrorism Act for quietly expressing opposition to genocide and standing with those who have taken direct action against it. By doing this, the government has shown that they are not using these laws to protect the public – rather to silence those who speak and act against genocide.”
In June, four Palestine Action activists became the first defendants convicted of property damage whose offending – during a 2024 raid on a factory near Bristol owned by the Israeli weapons manufacturer Elbit – was deemed by a judge post-conviction to have a “terrorist connection”.
A Home Office spokesperson said: “Showing support for a proscribed organisation is against the law. Decisions to arrest are operational matters for the police and are taken on the basis of the facts and circumstances of each case.”
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Supreme court legal challenge hearing on the proscription of Palestine Action
Very likely · Within months

London Uber driver Julius Mugabo has launched a high court challenge against Transport for London over severe licence renewal delays that left him in heavy debt and facing eviction.

Birmingham City Council is pursuing a High Court injunction to stop the 'Raise the Colours' group from placing flags on public infrastructure, citing staff harassment and safety concerns. The campaign has sparked local controversy over community cohesion.

Whistleblower Arturo Béjar claims a new settlement between US states and Meta fails to protect teens, arguing that time limits do not mitigate the addictive nature of algorithms. Meta maintains the agreement introduces significant safety and parental controls.

Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri testified in an Oakland federal court, denying allegations that Meta concealed negative data about teen safety features. The trial involves 29 US states suing Meta over claims that its platforms are addictive and harmful to children.

The IOPC is investigating former West Midlands Police Chief Constable Craig Guildford and four others for gross misconduct. The probe concerns an inaccurate intelligence report, allegedly using AI-generated errors, that led to the banning of Maccabi Tel Aviv fans.

A coroner has concluded that five-year-old Aalim Ahmed died in an accident after falling from a 15th-floor window in Plaistow, London. The inquest found the boy, who had autism, believed he could fly, and exonerated Newham Council of culpability.