
An immigrant argues that the narrative of immigrants swarming Australia to take jobs and culture is false, highlighting the difficult and costly immigration process and the significant contributions immigrants make to the nation's economy and society.
AI-generated summary
I’m an immigrant. If you subscribe to the common rhetoric in mainstream news, and coming out of the mouths of rightwing politicians, my very existence here in Australia is in direct opposition to the success of “ordinary” (meaning white) Australians.
Angus Taylor’s budget reply speech last week reinforced the widely held belief that Australia is being swarmed by immigrants, coming to take the jobs, housing and culture of white Australians who automatically are prescribed a right to be here, as if they didn’t arrive by boat or plane at some point, too.
I find this baffling, and not just because prejudice of this kind is illogical. The thing that actually confuses me is that people who hate immigration seem to think that it’s easy for anyone overseas to up sticks and come here to steal their “way of life”.
Having grown up watching relatives and friends try to get out of the developing countries my family originates from, I can tell you first-hand that migrating to Australia is far from easy. It certainly doesn’t occur on a whim – the three primary visa pathways for Australia are for skilled immigrants, family/spouse visas or student visas. All of these cost a considerable amount of money, require a large burden of proof and are often contingent on criteria that directly benefit the Australian community, whether that’s by filling skills gaps or agreeing to live and work in regional or remote areas for a specific period of time. Asylum seekers make up a minority of new arrivals.
The price of entry should be indication enough that those of us who do attain citizenship are committed to our new homes and communities.
My own family migrated here in 1992. My father is an electrical engineer and successfully acquired a position in a regional electricity company. Apparently a board meeting was held at the time to confirm that no local options existed for the role. My mother worked at the local supermarket. They later owned successful businesses and have contributed a significant amount in taxes over the past 30 years, while never being unemployed or requiring the social safety net that Australians are fortunate to have access to. They also contributed socially to their communities, serving on school boards and P&C committees, donating to charities and employing numerous people in their businesses.
We are absolutely grateful to have built a life as Australians, but it should be noted that, had my parents been able to offer us the same quality of life, they would always have preferred to remain in their birth country of Fiji. But after numerous violent coups that hinged on the racist anti-Indian legacy that Fiji continues to grapple with, their safety and chances of economic security were compromised.
Immigration is not something that is done impulsively. There is a considerable social and economic cost to the individual immigrant. And the fact that Australia is a desirable target for immigration is also not because of some inherent cultural superiority that has created our success as a nation – this is stolen land that was developed on convict labour. It has relied on the work and skills of immigrants throughout its history to become the prosperous democratic nation it is now.
Immigrants will always be the scapegoats of economic hardship. Our difference makes us easy targets for blame in a political system that eagerly bolsters racist ideologies to drive votes. But the idea that Australia is being mobbed by selfish foreigners seeking to pilfer the country’s riches and turn “Aussies” out of their jobs and homes is both entirely untrue and impossible based on the attributes of our immigration system.

Handmade signs along the Pacific Highway near Port Macquarie now support One Nation and criticize Centrelink as 'evil', reflecting frustration among residents of the Cowper electorate who face high unemployment, poverty, and bureaucratic hurdles in accessing government support, despite Australia's relatively strong social safety net compared to the US.

A former cricketer reflects on growing up in diverse western Sydney, experiencing racism as the 'brown kid' rather than for his faith. He discusses how cricket, once a sanctuary of meritocracy, became a place where his Muslim identity overshadowed his athletic achievements, especially after the Christchurch mosque shootings. The author advocates for reporting Islamophobia to combat hate speech and foster true inclusion.

An author criticizes Australian antisemitism envoy Jillian Segal's proposals, arguing they endanger free and independent news media. The proposals include adopting a specific antisemitism definition and establishing a new oversight body, which the author believes undermine editorial independence and are dangerous.

The author reflects on Australia's multicultural narrative, questioning if exceptional talent like Nestory Irankunda's is the sole reason for celebration, contrasting it with the vitriol faced by English footballers after misses. The piece also touches on anxieties exploited by politicians like Pauline Hanson and the 'model minority' myth.