
Istanbul Bar Association described the transfer of detained lawyer Mehmet Pehlivan from Çorlu to Kandıra at midnight without informing his family and lawyers as a 'violation of the prohibition of torture'.
AI-generated summary
Lawyer Mehmet Pehlivan is being tried in detention in the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality case due to his professional activities. Their trials are being held in Silivri.
In the statement made by the Istanbul Bar Association, they reacted to the transfer of detained lawyer Mehmet Pehlivan from Çorlu to Kandıra F Type Prison at 03:00 at night without informing his family and lawyers, and stated that the practice was a "violation of the prohibition of torture".
In the written statement made by the Istanbul Bar Association, the following was noted:
"Mehmet Pehlivan's transfer to Kandıra is a violation of the prohibition of torture. Our member, Lawyer Mehmet Pehlivan, who was on trial in the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality case based on allegations derived from his professional activities, was transferred from Çorlu High Security Prison to Kandıra F Type Prison at around 03:00 at night, without informing his family and lawyers. The sending of our colleague, whose hearings are ongoing in Silivri, hundreds of kilometers away from where he is on trial is a situation that will turn his participation in the hearings into torture. "This practice, which obviously makes it difficult for him to prepare for his defense and communicate effectively with his lawyers, is unacceptable."
"The MINISTRY SHOULD IMMEDIATELY EXPLAIN THE REASONS"
The statement stated that detention does not mean deprivation of rights and said:
"Article 17 of the Constitution prohibits torture, torment and treatment incompatible with human dignity. The material and moral integrity of the person and the presumption of innocence are guarantees that must be protected even in cases of war and mobilization in accordance with Article 15 of the Constitution. Every operation of the prison administration must comply with these guarantees.
Making legal activities the subject of accusations targets the independence of the defense; The fact that it is difficult for a detained lawyer to prepare his own defense aggravates this intervention. The Ministry of Justice must immediately explain the reason for the transfer, why it was carried out at night, and why his family and lawyers were not informed. As Istanbul Bar Association, our member Atty. We demand that this torture against Mehmet Pehlivan be stopped and that he be immediately transferred to the penal institution in Silivri, where his hearings are held. "We will follow our colleague's rights and the process."

Charles McCrory, who was sentenced to life imprisonment for killing his wife in 1985, is on the verge of release or retrial by a federal judge's decision after the only evidence, tooth print analysis, lost its reliability and the expert withdrew his testimony.

Within the scope of the 100th anniversary of the Civil Code, Nazan Moroğlu emphasized the revolutionary nature of the law in terms of women's rights and individual equality. Moroğlu stated that legal recognition of rights is not enough and the struggle must continue. He also said that the historical context should not be forgotten on the issues of alimony, surname and equal rights.

Emphasizing that there has been no progress on the 100th anniversary of the Civil Code, women's rights and gender equality, Aydeniz Alisbah Tuskan stated that women face male intervention in daily life, do not have sufficient representation in politics and 294 women were killed in 2025. Tuskan, who defined violence against women as a human rights violation, said that protecting secularism is important for women's rights and that child marriages are still a problem.

Mehmet Pehlivan, lawyer of detained IMM President Ekrem İmamoğlu, was transferred from the prison in Çorlu to Kandıra at midnight. The wrestler reacted by stating that this unjustified transfer hindered his right to defense and was a torture.

H.Y., whose house was moderately damaged in the earthquakes centered in Kahramanmaraş, overturned the appeal decision after winning the compensation case he filed against the administrations. Şahinbey Municipality initiated enforcement proceedings against the earthquake victim in order to recover the compensation paid with legal interest.

In the Cemil Çapar Apartment case, where 52 people died in the February 6 earthquakes in Hatay, Adana Regional Court of Justice overturned the decision of the local court on the grounds of incomplete research. A new expert report and signature review were requested.