
Plans that opened agriculture, olive groves and public areas to construction in Balçova, Bornova, Bayraklı and Kiraz were cancelled.
TMMOB Chamber of Urban Planners Izmir Branch announced that 4 controversial development plans that opened agriculture, olive groves and public areas to construction in Balçova, Bornova, Bayraklı and Kiraz were canceled by court decisions.
AI-generated summary
TMMOB Chamber of City Planners Izmir Branch carries out a legal fight against development plans that threaten the ecological balance of the city.
TMMOB Chamber of City Planners (ŞPO) Izmir Branch announced that 4 controversial development plans that threatened the ecological and urban balance of the city were returned from the judiciary.
Plans that opened agriculture, olive groves and public areas to construction in Balçova, Bornova, Bayraklı and Kiraz were canceled as they were found to be against the public interest. The conversion of the "Municipal Service Area" in Balçova İnciraltı into a "Commerce-Tourism Area" upon the request of Egeşehir A.Ş., without any technical analysis, was stopped by the Izmir 3rd Administrative Court on the grounds of disrupting the integrity of the public space.
The Ministry's development plans for conservation purposes, which opened the olive groves in Bornova Erzene to housing, were canceled by the Izmir 2nd Administrative Court. In the decision, it was emphasized that no biodiversity research or fault line studies were carried out in the region and that the project would destroy ecological values.
TOKI'S INSISTANCE IN AGRICULTURAL AREAS
TOKİ plans, which opened the agricultural areas in the Arkacılar District of Kiraz district for construction, could not pass the Izmir 4th Administrative Court for the second time, although they were revised. The reasons for the cancellation included the imposition of housing despite the decreasing population of the district, failure to separate facilities such as schools and health centers, and ignoring riverside flood risks.
Izmir 8th Administrative Court examined the plan change prepared with Emlak Konut GYO protocol in the reserve building area in Bayraklı Salhane; Although the construction density (precedent) was increased, it found it unlawful to not increase social facilities such as green areas and education and decided to annul it. In its statement, ŞPO Izmir Branch emphasized that the legal fight against rent-based projects that mortgage the future of the city will continue.

It was decided to continue the detention of former Ankara Deputy Chief Public Prosecutor Şadan Sakınan, who was tried for allegedly manipulating FETO investigations, during his hearing at the Supreme Court. The hearing was postponed to January 14, 2027.

The application of 5 lieutenants who were dismissed from the Turkish Armed Forces for chanting the slogan "We are Mustafa Kemal's soldiers" at the graduation ceremony on August 30, 2024, to the Constitutional Court for violation of the right to a fair trial was rejected on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction in terms of the subject.

Prof., who is on trial for allegedly poisoning AK Party Deputy İsmail Ok by administering the wrong medicine to him. Dr. Ali A. and emergency medical technician Şevval Ö. He was sentenced to imprisonment. The court decided to postpone the announcement of the verdict.
In the case of poisoning caused by drinking water in Bolu's Yuva village in 2022, the court sentenced village headman M.E. to 6 years and 8 months in prison, and Ü.B. to 3 years and 4 months in prison. The announcement of the verdict for the other 3 defendants was postponed.

Tolga Stream, the founder of the Manifest group, appeared before the judge for the first time in the case where he was accused of mediating the spread of obscene publications. The court decided to release Stream with an international travel ban and postponed the hearing to March 18, 2027.

Hakan Aysal, who was sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment for allegedly killing his pregnant wife Semra Aysal by pushing her from a cliff in Fethiye, was released upon the objection of the Supreme Court of Appeals Chief Public Prosecutor's Office and the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals Criminal General Assembly.