Supreme Court issues notice on complainant's petition seeking suspension of an additional district judge who heads a POCSO court
AI-generated summary
A rape complainant filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking suspension of a Uttar Pradesh additional district judge who has been chargesheeted for rape by Delhi Police. The judge heads a POCSO court which decides criminal cases against persons accused of sexually assaulting minors. The Allahabad High Court had earlier rejected her petition for suspension.
NEW DELHI: Can a UP additional district judge, chargesheeted for rape by Delhi police for allegedly sexually exploiting a woman, head a Pocso court which decides criminal cases against persons accused of sexually assaulting minors? Supreme Court has agreed to examine this petition filed by the rape complainant, reports Dhananjay Mahapatra. A bench of CJI Surya Kant, and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana issued notice Monday on the petition and sought response from Allahabad high court on her plea for suspension of the senior judicial officer. Appearing for the petitioner, advocate Rakesh Kumar Singh told the bench that at least judicial work should be withdrawn from the judge, but the Allahabad HC had rejected her petition. The bench in a cryptic order said, "Issue notice, returnable on Dec 11." The petitioner had lodged an FIR at Mayur Vihar police station on Dec 8, 2022 accusing the judicial officer, whom she met on a matrimonial site, of making repeated false promises to marry to establish a physical relationship with her. Delhi Police in Jan 2023 sought permission from Allahabad HC to proceed against the judicial officer. Two months later, Delhi HC granted the judge interim protection from arrest but allowed police to continue the investigations, she said. Police later recorded her statement before a magistrate. Police in June 2023 sent a reminder to Allahabad HC for early decision on request to proceed in investigations against the judicial officer but were informed by the HC that a vigilance inquiry was already going on against him. In Oct 2024, the chief justice of Allahabad HC permitted investigations, and the HC directed the judicial officer to cooperate with the probe.
In April 2025, Delhi police informed the Allahabad HC regarding proposal to file chargesheet against the judge and on May 5 last year, the chargesheet was filed against the additional district judge under Section 376 IPC (rape). In Nov last year, Delhi HC allowed the trial court to proceed with the chargesheet but continued the interim order protecting the judicial officer from arrest. On May 23, the chief metropolitan magistrate of Karkardooma courts in Delhi took cognisance of the chargesheet, leading the complainant to file a petition before Allahabad HC seeking suspension of the officer. She moved SC after HC declined her plea.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Supreme Court will hear the matter on December 11 and may direct the Allahabad High Court to consider suspending the judge or withdrawing judicial work from him.
Likely · Within weeks
The Supreme Court set aside Rajasthan High Court's adverse observations against a trial judge for inadvertent typographical errors in a judgment that did not affect the case outcome, holding the strictures unwarranted and a violation of natural justice principles.
India's Supreme Court ruled that no group, political party, NGO, or civil society outfit can occupy a protest site indefinitely, emphasizing the need to balance the right to protest with the livelihoods of traders and daily-wage workers. The court asked a traders' association seeking Rs 1,000 crore in damages to implead protest organizers and directed that protest sites be identified to allow demonstrations without hampering livelihoods.
Ladakh UT authorities have directed Sonam Wangchuk-founded HIAL to stop classes at Desert Flower School in Leh until the high court resolves a land dispute, citing lack of required approvals and an NOC that remains ungranted.
The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled in August 2026 that former Peoria police officers are entitled to immunity in Johnnie Lee Savory's civil rights lawsuit. Savory, convicted at age 14 for the 1977 murders of Connie Cooper and James Robinson after a 29-hour interrogation, was paroled in 2006 and pardoned in 2014. The court found qualified immunity protected officers on unlawful detention and coerced confession claims, and absolute immunity covered their trial testimony.
The 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a $114,663.11 legal fee award in a trade-secrets dispute, ruling that a law firm's use of AI tools does not automatically justify reduced fees and that the party challenging a bill must provide clear evidence of overcharging.

The Bombay High Court has criticized the objectionable comments of some politicians on actress Dia Mirza's environmental awareness video. The court clarified that the matter is related to the environment and directed BMC to restore the removed video.