AI-generated summary
The Anti-Weaponization Fund was announced in May as part of a settlement between Donald Trump and the IRS, under which Trump dropped a lawsuit over leaked tax returns in exchange for creating the fund to address claims of politically motivated prosecution. It was later declared 'dead' by Attorney General Todd Blanche in August amid criticism from both Democratic and Republican lawmakers.
A federal magistrate judge has ordered the administration of US President Donald Trump to disclose the names of those who devised a now-defunct fund for victims of politically-motivated prosecution. The lawsuit was filed by multiple plaintiffs, backed by a Soros-funded NGO.
Critics have argued that the $1.8 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund was designed to funnel taxpayer money to Trump’s supporters who claim they were unfairly investigated by the Justice Department, including those prosecuted over the Capitol Hill riots on January 6, 2021.
On Friday, Judge Ivan D. Davis granted a request that the identities of the masterminds behind the fund be revealed to the plaintiffs and their attorneys, noting that this information must not be made public at this stage.
The DOJ has insisted that the names of those people are “irrelevant” to the case and, moreover, constitute confidential attorney-client discussions or government officials’ deliberations. The Department has also filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit altogether.
Among the plaintiffs who challenged the creation of the initiative are a former federal prosecutor who was fired by the Trump administration after working on cases related to the Capitol Hill riots.
Providing legal support for the lawsuit is the Democracy Forward Foundation – a nonprofit organization that professes to advance “democracy and social progress through litigation, policy and public education, and regulatory engagement.” In May, it was named among the recipients of a five-year $300 million grant from billionaire George Soros’s Open Society Foundations (OSF), according to Inside Philanthropy.
The DOJ announced the creation of the fund in May as a part of a settlement agreement between Trump and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Under it, Trump and several members of his family, along with the Trump Organization, agreed to drop their lawsuit over a leak of their tax returns. In exchange, the Anti-Weaponization Fund was to be established to provide redress to “victims of lawfare and weaponization.”
“The machinery of government should never be weaponized against any American, and it is this Department’s intention to make right the wrongs that were previously done,” Attorney General Todd Blanche said at the time.
The Trump administration argued that there was a legal precedent for such an initiative, citing a $760 million fund created under former President Barack Obama to redress racism-related claims against the federal government.
However, faced with criticisms from both Democratic and Republican members of Congress, Blanche declared the fund “dead” in August.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Trump administration will comply with the judge's order and disclose the names of the fund's designers to the plaintiffs under seal.
Likely · Within days
The DOJ will pursue its motion to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing the fund designers' identities are irrelevant and protected by attorney-client privilege.
Possible · Within weeks

UN Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq expressed support for US negotiators Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner's visits to Moscow and Kiev to facilitate talks between Russia and Ukraine, stating the UN encourages all negotiation efforts.

RDIF head Kirill Dmitriev on the social network X commented on the victory of the Alternative for Germany party in the elections in Saxony-Anhalt, calling it historic and ridiculing Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who, according to him, became a “star” after the defeat of the ruling coalition.

The Ukrainian delegation at negotiations with US representatives in Kyiv was criticized on social networks for violating the business dress code: the participants appeared without ties, and David Arakhamia was wearing a T-shirt with the inscription “Kiev regime”. Users expressed dissatisfaction, linking the appearance of the delegation with corruption and unprofessionalism.

Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky said that the issue of sanctions against Russia was not raised at a meeting in Kyiv on September 6 with Trump's special envoy Steven Witkoff and Jared Kushner, expressing hope for the adoption of a law in the United States to tighten anti-Russian sanctions.

Special Envoy of the US President Steve Witkoff and son-in-law of the American President Jared Kushner left Kyiv following consultations on the Ukrainian settlement, departing by special train, as reported by the Ukrainian Railways company. Earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin met with the American negotiators in the Kremlin, emphasizing the need to eliminate the root causes of the conflict.

Steven Witkoff, special envoy to US President Donald Trump, said that during his visit to Russia he heard new ideas for resolving the conflict in Ukraine. He noted the progress in the negotiations and expressed hope for a rapprochement in the positions of Moscow and Kyiv.