KMT's Cheng Li-wen proposes EU model for cross-strait relations, lawyer calls it 'fraudulent'
Quick Look
- KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wen proposed an "EU model" for cross-strait peace during a forum in New York.
- Lawyer Huang Di-ying criticized the proposal, stating China's authoritarian regime disqualifies it from such a model, and suggested this is why Cheng was denied meetings with US officials.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wen proposed an "EU model" for cross-strait peace at a forum in New York. Lawyer Huang Di-ying criticized this, citing the EU's democratic prerequisites and contrasting them with China's authoritarian regime.
鄭麗文(中)。(圖擷取自鄭麗文臉書)
國民黨主席鄭麗文台灣時間9日受邀亞洲協會(Asia Society)紐約總部參加一公開座談,鄭麗文談到若國民黨重返執政的兩岸和平藍圖,並拋出「歐盟(EU)」的發展模式。對此,律師黃帝穎大酸,「歐盟模式前提是民主國家,中國是獨裁國家不符資格,鄭麗文瞎扯歐盟模式,難怪被美國華府官員拒見」。
黃帝穎今日於臉書發文指出,鄭麗文在「亞洲協會」(Asia Society)紐約總部座談,對兩岸和平藍圖,拋出「歐盟模式」。
黃帝穎指出,鄭麗文提兩岸歐盟模式在法律上不可能,宛如詐騙話術,美國政府看在眼裡,難怪鄭麗文遭華府官員與國會多數黨領袖拒見。依據《歐盟條約》第2條,歐盟植基於尊重人性尊嚴、自由、民主、平等、法治及人權等共同價值。憲章確保人民的政治與公民權利,落實民主監督。
黃帝穎坦言,中國是獨裁專制國家,當然不符合「歐盟模式」最基本的民主國家資格。
尤其,國際機構「自由之家」今年3月公布全球自由度數據,台灣自由指標分數93分,列為「自由國家」,但中國分數僅9分,列為「不自由國家」。
黃帝穎最後說,鄭麗文要把93分的資優台灣與9分的低劣獨裁中國扯在一起,訛稱「歐盟模式」,害台灣被迫平均不及格,這不只台灣人無法接受,美國與歐盟更不可能苟同!
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Cheng Li-wen may face further criticism regarding her cross-strait proposals.
Likely · Within weeks
Open Questions
- Will KMT's proposal gain traction domestically or internationally?
- What specific aspects of the EU model were intended for cross-strait relations?





