
The court ruled that the AI chatbot “My AI” illegally processes user data and shows unauthorized advertising to minors.
AI-generated summary
The Federal Association of Consumer Organizations (vzbv) sued Snap Group Limited over the way the AI chatbot 'My AI' processes personal data of minors.
You can use an AI assistant in the messenger app Snapchat. Minors can also ask questions and get answers. Is data processing being done correctly?
Cologne. According to a ruling, the messenger service Snapchat violates data protection and child protection. As can be seen from a ruling by the Cologne Regional Court, the operators illegally collected and processed user data via a chatbot powered by artificial intelligence (AI).
Snapchat is a messenger service that is used to send photos, videos and texts. It is particularly popular among young people, with the target group being those aged 13 and over. Users can interact with the Snap chatbot “My AI” and reveal information about themselves. Snap uses this information to personalize the user experience, for example with ads.
Consumer advocates see allegations confirmed by the verdict
The Federal Association of Consumer Organizations (vzbv) had filed a lawsuit against the company Snap Group Limited. “The chatbot poses as a friend on Snapchat and encourages you to feed it personal data,” says consumer advocate Ramona Pop. “A relationship of trust is created that tempts people to reveal sensitive information.” Children and young people are particularly at risk. “The EU can and must make it mandatory that platforms are preset safely for everyone.”
Pop complains that everything users enter in the chat can be evaluated and used for personalized advertising - including particularly sensitive data such as religion or sexual orientation. However, the processing of such data is only permitted in exceptional cases if there is the express consent of those affected; in the case of under-16s, the clear consent of the parents. “However, with Snapchat, consent was not even provided for,” says the consumer advocate. The judges followed this argument.
The verdict is available to the dpa. It also criticized the fact that Snap had preset the app to show users advertising about alcohol and gambling. The judges emphasize that such advertising should not be aimed at children or young people. Snap had argued in the proceedings that it did not offer gambling or alcohol advertising to minors because internal advertising guidelines forbade this. If the AI chatbot provides information about alcohol and gambling, it is not advertising, but rather just answers to user questions.
The plaintiff had made sample requests and pretended to be a 14-year-old girl who was asking about the best cocktail. According to the plaintiff, the chatbot's response was: "It's a matter of taste! Some popular cocktails are Mojito, Margarita and Piña Colada. Try them out!"
The matter will probably go to the next instance
The judges left open the question of whether the AI chatbot's answers constitute advertising. But even if the answers were not viewed as advertising, “there would still be at least a risk of the defendant committing a first offense with regard to the display of advertising under the headings of alcohol and gambling to underage users,” according to the judgment.
According to the verdict, the defendant company had tried to shirk responsibility to a certain extent: it was not processing the data, but rather its US parent company Snap Inc. The judges did not allow this to happen. The judgment is not yet legally binding. Snap left a press query unanswered. According to “Spiegel”, the company would like to take legal action.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Snap will appeal the ruling.
Likely · Within weeks
The Berlin administrative court has decided that a high school can ban demonstrative prayers. The court rated the protection of school peace higher than individual religious freedom, even though Muslim students were discriminated against.

The European Court of Justice has ruled that banks must generally refund the amount immediately in the event of unauthorized payment transactions. The bank cannot refuse reimbursement across the board on the grounds of gross negligence.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that banks must immediately refund customer funds in the event of phishing scams, provided the customers reported the incident in time. Exceptions only apply if the customer has reasonable suspicion of fraud.

According to the ECJ ruling, banks must immediately reimburse victims of account fraud, even if they are accused of gross negligence. A refund is possible subsequently, unless the customer suspects fraud.

Since midnight, the consumption of alcohol has been banned at all train stations in Germany, with the exception of restaurants within the train stations. The railway relies on a sense of proportion and sensitivity when checking, although violations can, in the worst case, result in a ban from the premises. The ban applies every day, including on days with major events such as Bundesliga games.

The Celle Higher Regional Court has declared the liability settlement between Volkswagen and former Audi boss Rupert Stadler from the emissions scandal to be invalid because shareholders were not sufficiently informed about Stadler's financial circumstances. Volkswagen is not announcing the decision and is considering legal remedies while a new settlement is negotiated.