India's National Human Rights Commission has issued notices to the ministries of electronics and information technology and information and broadcasting as part of its inquiry into whether Meta's systems actively participate in the generation, selection, circulation, amplification or monetisation of child sexual abuse material on Instagram, questioning the platform's status as a passive intermediary under IT Rules, 2021.
AI-generated summary
The NHRC inquiry follows allegations that paid advertisements on Instagram using terms like 'rape video' and 'child video' redirected users to Telegram channels offering child sexual abuse material for sale, as reported by BBC World Service. Earlier notices were issued to Delhi Police in July after the commission took cognisance of these allegations.
Details have also been sought regarding the regulatory status and obligations of Meta
NEW DELHI: National Human Rights Commission has issued notices to the ministries of electronics and information technology (MeitY) and information and broadcasting (I&B) as part of the ongoing scrutiny of circulation of child sexual abuse material on Instagram. NHRC member Priyank Kanoongo, whose bench issued the notices on Sept 2, highlighted that the inquiry was no longer confined to who uploaded objectionable content on a platform. "It also examines the extent to which the platform's own editorial and publishing systems participate in the generation, selection, circulation, amplification or monetisation of content," he said. The bench has asked whether a digital platform's legal position can continue to be treated merely as that of a passive intermediary when its systems actively generate, modify, curate, recommend, publish, amplify or monetise content. The commission has specifically asked the I&B ministry whether Meta falls within its regulatory purview as a publisher or publisher of online curated content under IT Rules, 2021 wherever the company's systems generate, modify, curate, recommend, publish or amplify content. Meta owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. Details have also been sought regarding the regulatory status and obligations of Meta and the action required to be taken by the ministry under the existing regulatory framework. The notices to the minis-tries follow ones issued to Delhi Police in July after NHRC took cognisance of allegations concerning paid ads on Instagram that facilitated access to child sexual abuse material. The commission has now sought action taken reports within two weeks from MeitY and the I&B ministry.
Join conversation
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
The matter arose after media reports by BBC World Service alleged that paid advertisements using terms such as "rape video" and "child video" were being displayed on Instagram to redirect users to Telegram channels where such material was allegedly offered for sale. The bench has also sought a response from MeitY regarding compliance with the provision on mandatory reporting of offences under Pocso Act 2012 and on whether the matter was reported to the special juvenile police unit or the local police. If not, MeitY has been asked to identify the officer or authority responsible and indicate the action taken for the lapse. Material placed before NHRC includes screenshots of Meta's systems which, according to the complainant, provide suggestions relating to content ideas, audience engagement strategies and monetisation methods.
End of Article
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
MeitY and the I&B ministry will issue clarifications or guidance on Meta's regulatory status as a publisher under IT Rules, 2021 within the two-week deadline
Likely · Within weeks
The NHRC may expand its inquiry to examine other Meta-owned platforms like Facebook and WhatsApp for similar content circulation issues
Possible · Within months
The Supreme Court of India ruled that the Bar Council of India lacks authority to discipline or regulate law students, quashing its letters threatening to debar Nalsar University law graduates for opposing CJI Surya Kant's convocation invitation, affirming that only parent institutions can take disciplinary action against students.
The Supreme Court of India ruled that the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) can require teacher education institutions to submit annual performance appraisal reports, emphasizing the council's role in ensuring quality education and overturning a high court order that had blocked the measure.
The Karnataka High Court ruled in favor of landowner Horakerappa, affirming that 40 years of unauthorized possession and incorrect revenue entries by a neighbor do not establish legal ownership. The court emphasized that title requires clear evidence beyond mere occupation.
The Kerala High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a father accused of neglecting his 16-year-old son. The court ruled that Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act requires 'actual charge or control' over the child, which was absent as the father worked abroad.
ITAT Mumbai ruled that tax authorities cannot hold one co-owner liable for the entire tax difference between a property's purchase price and stamp duty value. The tribunal emphasized that tax liability must be assessed based on documented ownership shares.
The NCDRC held the Post Office responsible for Rs 6 lakh deposited by two complainants via cheques, rejecting arguments denying liability for fraudulent agent actions.