Former India captain critiques bowling changes after West Indies chases down 250 in Ranchi
Former India captain Sunil Gavaskar criticized India's bowling tactics following their six-wicket defeat to the West Indies in Ranchi, where the visitors chased down 250 to level the T20I series 1-1.
AI-generated summary
India played the second T20I against the West Indies in Ranchi, setting a target of 249/5 which the West Indies successfully chased.
Former India captain Sunil Gavaskar has questioned India's bowling decisions during their six-wicket defeat to the West Indies in the second T20I in Ranchi. He believes India could have used fast bowlers Arshdeep Singh or Mayank Yadav for the 18th over instead of Axar Patel, as the visitors chased down a target of 250 to level the five-match series 1-1. India scored 249/5, but the West Indies reached 252/4 in 19.2 overs, completing the highest successful T20I chase against India.
Gavaskar felt Mayank, who took three wickets and gave India early breakthroughs, could have been a better choice to bowl the 18th over, even though Arshdeep had conceded plenty of runs in his final over. “Definitely! I would have gone with either Arshdeep or Mayank. Yes, Arshdeep went for plenty in his final over, but Mayank had struck the early blows. Of the wickets that had fallen, he had taken three. His economy rate was about 12 an over, and at that stage, the West Indies needed more than that. So, if he had taken a wicket, and sometimes when the game is going in your favour, who knows, you would have got a wicket even if it had not been off a great delivery,” Gavaskar told JioStar. He added that taking another wicket could have put pressure on the West Indies by forcing a new batter to come to the crease.
Gavaskar also questioned India's decision to bring Shivam Dube into the attack in the ninth over. He felt left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep Yadav might have been a better choice while the West Indies batters were still settling in. “And once you get a wicket, suddenly, the opposition is on the back foot. A new batter has to come in. So, maybe that could have been tried. For me, I think giving Shivam Dube the ball in that ninth over was not exactly what was required at that stage.
When the batters were still trying to get their eye in, maybe Kuldeep coming in would have been a better idea,” he added. India struggled to contain Shai Hope and Sherfane Rutherford after their early breakthroughs. Hope remained unbeaten on 102 off 45 balls, while Rutherford smashed 84 off 37 deliveries. Their 120-run partnership turned the chase in the visitors' favour, leaving India with questions to answer ahead of the third T20I in Indore.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Teams will play the third T20I in Indore
Very likely · Within days
The Indian Olympic Association scheduled its Executive Council elections for December 5 and appointed Sanjay Kumar Srivastava as returning officer, amid India's bid to host the 2036 Olympic Games.
Royal Challengers Bengaluru batting coach Dinesh Karthik argues that the IPL should retain the Impact Player rule until the 2027 season, asserting that removing it mid-cycle would be unfair to franchises.
India head coach Gautam Gambhir defended promoting Shivam Dube to No. 4 despite his low score against West Indies, stating T20 batting orders remain flexible.
Eighteen-year-old Jason Rowles became the most expensive signing at the SA20 Season 5 Auction after being secured by Joburg Super Kings for R2.9 million.
Ball-by-ball commentary of a Test cricket match between South Africa and Australia, highlighting Wiaan Mulder's wicket of Pat Cummins and the deployment of the second new ball.
India head coach Gautam Gambhir defended promoting Shivam Dube to No. 4 after a T20I loss to West Indies, stating only opening positions are fixed in T20 cricket.