
Ad spending shatters records, driven by millions from super PACs following the Citizens United decision.
Midterm election campaign spending in the US has exceeded $10 billion, fueled by massive super PAC donations from wealthy donors like Elon Musk and George Soros, even as voters prioritize cost of living concerns.
AI-generated summary
The Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United decision eliminated limits on donations to super PACs, enabling unlimited political spending.
Campaign spending for these midterm elections passed 10 billion dollars this week, according to the tracking group AdImpact.
Maybe we should repeat that number: $10 billion dollars.
The senate race in Ohio, for example, has already cost more than $460 million in combined ad spending. The Texas Senate race has surpassed half a billion. Then there's $260 million more in the Maine Senate race.
The most expensive House race in the country isn't in California or New York, but Michigan's 7th congressional district with nearly $60 million in ads. Contests in Iowa and Florida are just under $50 million apiece.
There are limits on personal campaign contributions in the United States--but, since the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision in 2010, no limits on donations to "super PACs," which can publicly support or oppose candidates but can't directly coordinate with campaigns. Rich donors have used that ruling to steer hundreds of millions of dollars to support both parties, up and down the ballot. Elon Musk alone has given $276 million to Republican groups, just since July. George Soros has given more than $100 million dollars to Democrats this election cycle.
Meanwhile, voters, whom politicians are trying to win over with all these ads, tell pollsters and reporters that their top issues this fall are the economy and the cost of living. Inflation is up; gas prices have spiked since the start of the Iran war; groceries cost a third more than they did in 2019.
It is hard not to wonder: what could those hundreds of millions of ad dollars accomplish if they went toward food, gas, or shelter for those in need, or to help people with health care costs? Could some of it pay for school nurses, music teachers, and librarians? Subsidize addiction care? Clean up public parks?
Maybe a candidate could win support these days by declaring, "And I vow to spend less money on my campaign than my opponent!" After all, as the Los Angeles Dodgers might remind us this week, spending the most money doesn't always deliver victory.

Georgia defeated Alabama in a top-tier SEC clash, while coaching tensions flared at Texas A&M and LSU. Meanwhile, UCLA's undefeated start continues, Texas suffered its first loss, and South Carolina secured a significant road win over Florida.

Dana Altman announced his retirement as Oregon's men's basketball coach after 16 seasons, one day before Big Ten Media Day, citing health concerns and a lack of the energy and fire needed to lead the team effectively, following a trend of late retirements by power-conference coaches with Final Four experience.

American poets like Whitman, Lazarus, Hughes, Lim, and Ferlinghetti have long captured the nation's complex identity, from its welcoming ideals to its struggles with inequality, highlighting its ongoing evolution.

Reflecting on America's 250th birthday, the author acknowledges a decline in national optimism and direction since the turn of the century, citing issues like political division, wealth inequality, and misinformation. However, they find reasons for hope in scientific progress, credible journalism, and the inherent resilience and capacity for self-remaking within the country, urging collective action.

Historian Eddie Glaude Jr. expresses deep rage and sadness as the U.S. approaches its 250th anniversary, criticizing the nation's failure to live up to its founding principles and its ongoing racial divisions. He argues America must confront its past and move beyond an adolescent self-image.

An opinion piece reviewing Theo Baker's forthcoming book 'How to Rule the World' about Stanford University's startup culture. The piece examines whether critical accounts of Silicon Valley ambition — like 'The Social Network' — actually discourage students or serve as recruitment tools. Baker describes an 'invite-only world' where VCs wine and dine teenagers, 'pre-idea funding' flows before original thoughts, and the line between mentorship and predation blurs. The author questions whether such books can change anything when cautionary tales seem to glamorize rather than deter the very behavior they critique.