Scotland Yard faces an independent investigation into its failure in 2019 to pass claims alleging wrongdoing by Thomas Markle, the father of the Duchess of Sussex, to law enforcement agencies overseas.
The force had referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct over its handling of a letter written by Markle’s former wife, Roslyn Loveless. Markle, 82, is now facing claims of child sexual abuse in the Philippines, which he denies, and is under investigation by authorities there.
On Friday, the IOPC decided to use its formal powers to launch an investigation into the Met. The police watchdog views the claims in the 2019 letter as potentially alleging serious offending.
Its investigation will look at who in the Met made decisions such as not to pass on the claims to police forces in countries where wrongdoing by Markle was alleged, and whether police policies and procedures were followed.
An IOPC spokesperson said: “Following a voluntary conduct referral from the Met police, we have decided an independent investigation is required into its failure to pass on allegations of serious offending, contained in a letter it received in 2019, to relevant overseas authorities at the time.”
The Met had announced on Thursday its voluntary referral to the IOPC about the handling of the 2019 letter. It also referred whether its decision to pass the letter to the office of the Duchess of Sussex could have been a breach of data rules because it contained sensitive information. The IOPC has decided it will not investigate that.
The contents of the letter are understood to have played a part in Meghan’s estrangement from her father. The Guardian understands that the long letter made claims about Markle’s activities in the US, the Philippines and Thailand.
The Met has said it did not investigate because the allegations related to potential unlawful activity overseas. But for seven years it did not pass on details to the countries affected, and it is only now sending details of the letter to the FBI in the US and law enforcement in the Philippines, where Markle lived until May, as well as Thai counterparts.
Markle, now in the US, has admitted paying for sex but denies possessing material that would be illegal. On Saturday the Philippine interior minister, Jonvic Remulla, told the Guardian that all signs pointed to Markle being a “possible sex offender of the grossest kind” and that a full forensic investigation would give a “definitive picture”.
Investigators in the Philippines are examining digital images alleged to belong to Markle and alleged to have been found at his former home in the south-east Asian country.
Meghan’s half-brother, also called Thomas, reported to Philippine authorities last week the alleged discovery of child sexual abuse images. Footage on Thursday showed Markle Jr present as Philippine officials started gathering material to examine.
The scale of embarrassment for the Met will depend on whether investigators in the Philippines assess that the allegations relating to child sexual abuse images have any credence.
On Thursday the Met commander Adam Slonecki, who leads its protection command, said the letter had been sent in 2019 to the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre. “The author of the letter suggested they were writing to raise concerns relating to the security of the Duchess of Sussex. While the letter did not actually contain any information specifically related to security matters, it did contain a number of claims about alleged offending outside the United Kingdom,” he said.
“The letter was assessed and subsequently passed to the office of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex for their awareness. The details of the allegations in the letter were not shared with other law enforcement agencies.”
