AI-generated summary
Satyaki Savarkar filed a criminal defamation case against Rahul Gandhi regarding statements made in London in 2023. The complainant alleges Gandhi falsely attributed claims of violence against Muslims to V D Savarkar.
PUNE: Satyaki Savarkar, grandnephew of Hindutva ideologue V D Savarkar, told a special court in Pune on Tuesday that Savarkar "never hated Muslims" and had written about ways for their progress, while alleging that Congress leader Rahul Gandhi had portrayed him as an "extreme hater of Muslims". Satyaki made the remarks while being cross-examined by advocate Milind Pawar in a criminal defamation case linked to statements allegedly made by Gandhi in London in 2023, news agency PTI reported.
During the cross-examination, Pawar asked Satyaki to identify the exact words in Gandhi's alleged speech that he believed had lowered the reputation of Swatantryaveer Savarkar. Satyaki referred to Gandhi's statement that "Savarkar had written in a book that he and five to six friends had assaulted a Muslim youth and derived pleasure from the act". "By these words, Savarkar was portrayed as an extreme hater of Muslims and as a mob lyncher. Savarkar never hated Muslims. Rather, in his writings, he showed the ways and means for their progress," he said.
During the proceedings, Pawar also submitted a 2004 video interview of Satyaki's grandfather Gopal Godse along with its transcripts, PTI reported. Gopal Godse, the younger brother of Nathuram Godse, is purportedly heard acknowledging in the interview that Nathuram Godse was an RSS member. Nathuram Godse was one of the conspirators in the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi.
Satyaki had filed the criminal defamation case against Gandhi, alleging that the Congress leader falsely claimed that V D Savarkar had written in a book about assaulting a Muslim youth with five or six friends and deriving pleasure from the act. The complainant has maintained that no such incident appears in Savarkar's writings. The case concerns Gandhi's alleged remarks made in London in 2023.
USCIS has introduced a mandatory new version of Form I-864, the Affidavit of Support for green card applicants. The updated form includes a privacy release authorizing USCIS to access credit reports from consumer reporting agencies to verify sponsor financial data.
A Kerala district consumer commission ordered Kalyan Silks to pay Rs 31,500 in restitution and damages. The retailer's Onam advertisement was found misleading for failing to clearly disclose that a Rs 1,500 shopping benefit required additional future purchases.
The Supreme Court of India directed the Bar Council of India (BCI) to consult the Attorney General and Solicitor General on policy decisions. The order follows petitions challenging the extended tenure of BCI chairperson Manan Kumar Mishra.
The Karnataka High Court dismissed a husband's plea to stop paying Rs 9,000 monthly maintenance, ruling that a wife is not legally required to perform household chores or care for in-laws, and has the autonomy to visit her parents without permission.
The Bombay High Court has ordered the CBI to take over the investigation into the 2020 death of Disha Salian, citing significant flaws in the Mumbai Police's handling of the case and the failure to register an FIR for six years.
The Supreme Court of India ruled that a rectification deed cannot be used to change the identity of a property. The court protected the land rights of the late Thimmadasappa's heirs, rejecting an attempt by K.M. Venkatamuniyappa to claim land via a unilateral deed.