Sponsors must use the new version of Form I-864 starting August 31, which includes a privacy release allowing USCIS to access credit reports.
AI-generated summary
Form I-864 is a legally binding contract used by sponsors to demonstrate financial support for immigrants. Sponsors are generally required to show income at or above 125% of federal poverty guidelines.
The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has made an overnight change to the Form I-864, which is the ‘Affidavit of Support’ filed by those sponsoring family members for a green card. From Aug 31, only the new version will be accepted for filings submitted on or after this date – no grace period is available for continued use of the older form.
American Immigration Lawyers’ Association (AILA) points out a notable change in the new version. “It includes a privacy release that authorizes USCIS to request credit related information (about the sponsor) from one or more consumer reporting agencies.”
“If a sponsor has a credit or security freeze on their consumer or credit report file, USCIS may not be able to access the information necessary to assess the sufficiency of Form I-864. To avoid any delays, a sponsor should expeditiously respond to any requests made to release a credit or security freeze,” states AILA. Consumers typically place a freeze with the major credit-reporting agencies to help prevent unauthorized accounts from being opened in their name. A freeze does not erase or damage a person's credit history; it simply limits who can access the report while the freeze is in place.
Manifest Law has posted insights on this development. Ana Gabriela Urizar, immigration attorney states that while Form I-864 was already a binding contract to support the immigrant financially, the addition made is that “USCIS can go straight to the credit bureaus to check your numbers, so sponsors should make sure their income and asset documentation actually matches what's on file before they sign."
Immigration attorneys point out that the new form does not specify any credit score that must be met. USCIS has also not announced that every sponsor will undergo a credit inquiry or that every sponsor's credit score will routinely be reviewed. While the new form does not state that a low credit score, high credit-card balances, missed payments, or a prior bankruptcy automatically disqualifies someone from being a financial sponsor, immigration attorneys add that it remains to be seen how USCIS will use its authority.
Form I-864 has traditionally focused on the sponsor's financial ability through information such as: Household size; current annual income and household income; federal tax returns; income and asset documentation to name a few. The basic financial requirement has not been replaced by a credit-score requirement. Generally, a sponsor must demonstrate income at or above 125% of the applicable federal poverty guidelines. To illustrate – this translates into $41,250 for a household of four members in the Washington DC area. With USCIS now having an additional avenue to seek financial information about the sponsor it makes the Form I-864 review broader.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Processing delays for sponsors with credit security freezes.
Likely · Within weeks
Satyaki Savarkar, grandnephew of V D Savarkar, testified in a Pune court that Rahul Gandhi defamed his ancestor by falsely claiming Savarkar wrote about assaulting a Muslim youth. The case stems from remarks Gandhi allegedly made in London in 2023.
A Kerala district consumer commission ordered Kalyan Silks to pay Rs 31,500 in restitution and damages. The retailer's Onam advertisement was found misleading for failing to clearly disclose that a Rs 1,500 shopping benefit required additional future purchases.
The Supreme Court of India directed the Bar Council of India (BCI) to consult the Attorney General and Solicitor General on policy decisions. The order follows petitions challenging the extended tenure of BCI chairperson Manan Kumar Mishra.
The Karnataka High Court dismissed a husband's plea to stop paying Rs 9,000 monthly maintenance, ruling that a wife is not legally required to perform household chores or care for in-laws, and has the autonomy to visit her parents without permission.
The Bombay High Court has ordered the CBI to take over the investigation into the 2020 death of Disha Salian, citing significant flaws in the Mumbai Police's handling of the case and the failure to register an FIR for six years.
The Supreme Court of India ruled that a rectification deed cannot be used to change the identity of a property. The court protected the land rights of the late Thimmadasappa's heirs, rejecting an attempt by K.M. Venkatamuniyappa to claim land via a unilateral deed.