Breaking
DEPolice arrest armed man at high school in DresdenCNU.S. Defense Secretary Hergseth plans to cut 20% of generals by January next yearRUThe French Prime Minister convened an anti-crisis meeting due to schoolchildren's protestsFRFires and tensions during high school mobilizations in several cities in FranceRUSummary of the progress of the special military operation in Ukraine as of October 1, 2026TRParliament dissolved in New Zealand: Election process has begunBRPresident of Israel to honor passengers who prevented Flydubai plane crashITSecurity devices have been strengthened for the demonstrations on 7 OctoberDEPotsdam imposes budget freeze due to tense financial situationINTLTensions rise on Korean border after land mine incidentDEPolice arrest armed man at high school in DresdenCNU.S. Defense Secretary Hergseth plans to cut 20% of generals by January next yearRUThe French Prime Minister convened an anti-crisis meeting due to schoolchildren's protestsFRFires and tensions during high school mobilizations in several cities in FranceRUSummary of the progress of the special military operation in Ukraine as of October 1, 2026TRParliament dissolved in New Zealand: Election process has begunBRPresident of Israel to honor passengers who prevented Flydubai plane crashITSecurity devices have been strengthened for the demonstrations on 7 OctoberDEPotsdam imposes budget freeze due to tense financial situationINTLTensions rise on Korean border after land mine incident
NewsgatherNewsgather
All StoriesWorldSportsFinanceTechScience
Sign In
All StoriesWorldSportsFinanceTechScienceHealthCultureClimatePoliticsSpace
NewsgatherNewsgather

Real-time global news intelligence. Curated by humans, powered by data.

Sections

All StoriesWorldSportsFinanceTechScience

More

HealthCultureClimatePoliticsSpace

Company

AboutEditorial StandardsAdvertisingCareersPressContact

©️ 2026 Newsgather. A product by All Software 24. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyImprintTerms of UseContent and Editorial PolicyRemoval RequestDelete Your AccountAdvertising PolicyContact
Back|Richard Nixon’s War on the Press Offers a Historical Precedent for Donald Trump
Richard Nixon’s War on the Press Offers a Historical Precedent for Donald Trump
NEWS
TIME·2 hours ago·Opinion·6 min read

Richard Nixon’s War on the Press Offers a Historical Precedent for Donald Trump

Long before Donald Trump railed against fake news, Richard Nixon waged a sustained campaign to intimidate and punish journalists who covered him.

Quick Look

Examining Richard Nixon's aggressive, systemic campaign against the American press highlights historical precedents for modern political attacks on journalists, including wiretaps, license challenges, and intimidation.

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

Richard Nixon maintained an intensely adversarial and restrictive relationship with the press throughout his presidency, utilizing wiretaps, audits, and legal threats.

Font size

Berating reporters, revoking credentials, suing news organizations—hardly a week goes by without Donald Trump’s attacking the press. An experienced commander of headlines and inveterate consumer of media, he cajoles journalists one day and harangues them the next. But the man who preceded Trump as the President to appear most often on the cover of TIME reigned supreme in media manipulation too. Well before Trump railed against fake news, Richard Nixon waged a sustained campaign to intimidate and punish those who covered him.

The relationship between Presidents and the press is inherently adversarial. Since the emergence of a modern mass media and a professional White House press corps in the early 20th century, Presidents have sought to use journalists to disseminate their ideas, goals, and achievements—and have treated coverage that deviates from their spin as misleading, hostile, or malicious. Reporters, on the other hand, while recognizing their duty to relay what the President says and does, believe that they can offer a fuller, more accurate account of events than the White House does—by adding context, checking facts, and airing dissenting views. In that difference of perspective lies a recipe for conflict.

Every President has warred with journalists. Theodore Roosevelt sued Joseph Pulitzer’s New York World for alleging corruption in the purchase of the Panama Canal. (He lost.) Franklin Roosevelt instructed an impertinent correspondent to don a dunce cap and stand in the corner. Dwight Eisenhower baldly lied to the press after the Soviet Union shot down an American spy plane. Barack Obama tried to exclude Fox News from an interview with the other TV networks and used the Espionage Act to pursue leakers. The list goes on.

But, at least until Trump, no other President had a more contentious relationship with the media than Nixon. By the time he took office in 1969, the White House–press relationship had grown sharply combative, thanks to the Vietnam War, Lyndon Johnson’s “credibility gap,” and the cultural upheavals and suspicion of authority that marked the 1960s. Journalists took it for granted that Nixon, with his long history of resenting the press, had nefarious designs on neutering the Fourth Estate. The venerated CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite labeled Nixon’s antipress campaign “a grand conspiracy.” Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee charged that “the First ­Amendment is in greater danger than any time I’ve seen it.” A National Press Club report found Nixon guilty of “an unprecedented, government-­wide effort to control, restrict and conceal information” and “discredit the press.” And all of this happened before impeachment proceedings even began.

The relationship was not exclusively hostile. As with all administrations, there were ups and downs. At times, even as they distrusted him personally, reporters showered Nixon with admiring coverage, such as during the summer of 1972 when détente was easing tensions with the Soviet Union and after Nixon made his breakthrough trip to communist China. That summer, according to press critic Ben Bagdikian’s count, of more than 2,200 Washington correspondents, only about a dozen pursued the emerging Watergate story. Nixon coasted to re-election.

Yet these bouts of positive coverage did little to appease Nixon, whose antipress campaign continued unabated. Some of the President’s men later owned up to zealotry. “We used to watch the news broadcasts and go up the walls at what we thought was unfair coverage of Nixon,” recalled Chuck Colson, who in the fall of 1972 bullied CBS executives into shortening the second part of a Watergate exposé. Speechwriter Ray Price said flatly, “We did often lie, mislead, deceive, try to use [the press], and to con them.” William Safire, another speechwriter, recalled Nixon insisting that “the press is the enemy ... to be hated and beaten”—an attitude Safire called “neither justifiable nor defensible” and yet deeply held.

The particular skirmishes in Nixon’s war on journalists would fill not only a ledger but a shelf of books. (In writing my own book about Nixon, I consumed at least a dozen books on the subject, with titles like The Chilling Effect in TV News: Intimidation by the Nixon White House and The Engineering of Restraint: The Nixon Administration and the Press.) Some of the Administration’s offenses appear in retrospect fairly routine or mild, like the maddening evasiveness of press secretary Ron Ziegler, or even Vice President Spiro Agnew’s baroque diatribes in which he lashed out at the power of the TV networks and major newspapers. But others were genuinely disturbing assaults on the independence of the press corps, waged by a man loath to acknowledge any constraints on his power.

One of the earliest of these was Nixon’s plan, hatched with National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger, to stop leaks by wiretapping the homes and phones of journalists who reported critically on the Administration’s actions, starting with the 1969 bombing of North Vietnamese sanctuaries in Cambodia, which the White House had hoped to keep secret. At the Georgetown home of syndicated columnist Joseph Kraft, another targeted newsman, White House hireling John J. Ragan, wearing a repairman’s uniform, climbed up a nearby telephone pole to install a battery-operated transmitter that would convey every conversation on the Kraft family phone to a tape recorder in the trunk of a car parked close by. The wiretaps on Kraft and other reporters, installed without any warrant, wouldn’t be exposed until just before the 1973 Watergate hearings, but they were later found to be unconstitutional infringements on the journalists’ rights.

The wiretapping scheme grew out of Nixon and Kissinger’s mania for clamping down on leaks that might damage the Administration’s standing. That mania resurfaced in 1971, after the New York Times published the Pentagon Papers, a Defense Department study of American involvement in the Vietnam War. Told by Kissinger that he would be seen as a “weakling” if he didn’t respond, the President had his Attorney General sue the Times to force it to stop publishing the classified documents. No previous Administration had ever tried to impose “prior restraint”—government censorship prohibiting the publication of material before it appears. Eventually, in a landmark First Amendment case, the Supreme Court rejected Nixon’s claim that national security justified the suppression of the information. But the Pentagon Papers leak had other consequences too: it spurred the White House to create the so-called Plumbers unit—plumbers, after all, fix leaks—that would soon engage in a battery of illegal activities, including the break-ins at the Democratic headquarters at the Watergate complex in 1972.

Nixon also used the power of the Executive Branch to punish news outlets he considered ­unfriendly. The Washington Post Co. at the time owned two Florida television stations, WJXT in Jacksonville and WPLG in Miami, whose licenses were regulated by the Federal Communications Commission. Furious that the Post was digging into Watergate, Nixon fumed to his aides H.R. Haldeman and John Dean in September 1972, “The Post is going to have damnable, damnable problems out of this one. They have a television station ... and they’re going to have to get it renewed ... the game has to be played awfully rough.” Soon thereafter, allies of Nixon challenged the Post’s ownership of those licenses—challenges that failed but that hurt the company’s stock price and cost it huge legal fees.

Individuals, too, faced retribution. White House correspondent Martin Schram of Newsday, who had reported on Nixon’s dubious financial entanglements with his shady friend Bebe Rebozo, was excluded from the President’s historic 1972 China trip. CBS News’ Daniel Schorr endured an FBI investigation after a negative piece about Nixon’s pledge to help Catholic parochial schools. Nixon often told aides to have the IRS audit his journalistic detractors; some of these enemies were audited, although direct links to the President’s instructions were hard to prove. Nixon and his confidants also discussed taking revenge on syndicated journalist Jack Anderson, a regular thorn in the ­Administration’s side. G. Gordon Liddy, the resident wild man of Nixon’s re-election team, at one point plotted in all seriousness to have the columnist assassinated, even enlisting a CIA poison expert to help with the planning. Saner heads quashed the plan.

Related Topics

People
Organizations
Places
Topics
This article was originally published by TIME.

Quick Look

Examining Richard Nixon's aggressive, systemic campaign against the American press highlights historical precedents for modern political attacks on journalists, including wiretaps, license challenges, and intimidation.

AI-generated summary

Story signals

News tone
Neutral
Emotional intensity
High
News value
Moderate
Global impact
National
Follow-up likelihood
Unlikely
Relevance window
Years

Source & Reliability

Source
TIME
Story type
Analysis
Source quality
Full
Published
2 hours ago
richard nixon
white house
press
richard nixon
Donald Trump
Richard Nixon
Theodore Roosevelt
Joseph Pulitzer
TIME
New York World
Fox News
CBS
China
Cambodia
Georgetown
Florida
white house
press
journalism
watergate
first amendment
media manipulation

Related Stories

More on this topicrichard nixon
Reflections on Sexism in Media, Tech, and the Creation of WIRED Women
Opinion·9/21/2026

Reflections on Sexism in Media, Tech, and the Creation of WIRED Women

WIRED's global editorial director reflects on systemic sexism across her 17-year career in media and tech, detailing encounters with workplace misogyny and introducing a special upcoming issue focused on women.

Wired
4 min read
Over-50s job seekers face systemic barriers as pension age rises
Developing·9/20/2026

Over-50s job seekers face systemic barriers as pension age rises

A 61-year-old former advice worker reflects on personal unemployment and systemic challenges faced by over-50s seeking work, citing pension age reforms and calling for a 21st-century Beveridge-style overhaul of social security.

Guardian Business
2 min read
How the West walked into Osama bin Laden’s trap
Opinion·9/9/2026

How the West walked into Osama bin Laden’s trap

Reflecting on over two decades since 9/11, an analysis argues that the West walked straight into Osama bin Laden's trap by launching costly, destabilising wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that drained its resources and left it vulnerable to rising global rivals like Vladimir Putin.

The Independent World
5 min read
Marina Hyde reflects on Britain's political chaos and personal optimism in new book extract
Opinion·9/5/2026

Marina Hyde reflects on Britain's political chaos and personal optimism in new book extract

Marina Hyde's book extract critiques Britain's rapid turnover of prime ministers, political instability, and cultural absurdities while maintaining personal optimism about humanity's resilience despite systemic failures.

Guardian International
3 min read
The Evolution of Ukrainian Rage: From Resistance to Resilience
Opinion·9/4/2026

The Evolution of Ukrainian Rage: From Resistance to Resilience

Reflecting on the role of rage in Ukraine's resistance, the author examines how Verdi’s Requiem and Homeric epics mirror the nation's wartime fury, noting a shift from intense, generative anger to a weary, grim determination as the conflict persists.

Guardian International
5 min read
Damn the electorate? No, our disgruntlement with prime ministers is entirely rational
Opinion·9/2/2026

Damn the electorate? No, our disgruntlement with prime ministers is entirely rational

Voters' impatience with prime ministers is rational, driven by leaders quickly betraying the public interest for wealthy donors, exemplified by Andy Burnham abandoning plans to cap political donations.

Guardian International
4 min read
More on this topicrichard nixon