Rishi Sunak Calls for National Insurance Abolition to Counter AI Job Displacement
Former UK PM suggests replacing employment taxes with corporate profits taxes as he warns of AI's impact on young workers
Quick Look
- Former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has called for the abolition of National Insurance to make hiring workers more attractive as AI increasingly affects jobs.
- Now an adviser to AI firms Anthropic and Microsoft, Sunak acknowledged concerns from graduates seeking entry-level jobs are justified.
- He suggested rebalancing the tax system by replacing National Insurance with corporate profit taxes, warning that AI's impact on employment may differ from previous technology cycles.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Rishi Sunak served as UK Prime Minister from 2022 to 2024. During his tenure, he made AI regulation a priority, establishing the AI Safety Summit in 2023. He has since taken advisory roles with major AI companies Anthropic and Microsoft, as well as investment bank Goldman Sachs. His comments come as AI tools increasingly demonstrate capabilities that rival human workers in various sectors.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is affecting jobs and the economy so profoundly that governments should eliminate National Insurance to make hiring workers more attractive, former PM Rishi Sunak has told the BBC. Sunak, now an adviser to AI firm Anthropic and Microsoft, said while he is an enthusiast for the transformative impact of AI, he said concerns from graduates looking for entry level jobs were justified. "There are reasons to be worried and think about the future. But we are able to do something about this," he said. Sunak suggested rebalancing the tax system by abolishing National Insurance "over time" and replacing with it with taxes on corporate profits. Sunak said it is getting tougher for young people getting jobs in service sectors such as law, accountancy and the creative industries. "So we should be thinking about, well, how do we tip the balance in favour of AI being used in that positive way… to help people do their jobs better [rather than replacing them]," he told BBC Newsnight. Sunak said that lots of countries will have to examine how to rebalance their systems as they face raising less revenue from taxing employment and will have to find that money elsewhere. He said the impact on employment by AI "may be different to previous technology cycles, and we want to do what we can to tip the scales in a more positive direction". During his time as prime minister, he made tech regulation a significant priority, setting up an AI safety summit in 2023. The company said it found that the tool can outperform humans at some hacking and cyber-security tasks, prompting discussions by regulators, legislators and financial institutions about the dangers it could pose to digital services. Sunak, who is also a senior adviser at investment bank Goldman Sachs, said concerns about the development of Mythos showed "we shouldn't rely on companies to mark their own homework". He said it was to Anthropic's credit and to the UK's benefit, that Britain's AI Security Institute, established under his premiership, had become the first to test Mythos' capabilities. The Conservative MP also revealed that he had joined forces with Labour's deputy prime minister David Lammy to promote investment in the UK tech sector at a recent AI summit. Sunak said he was a "big believer" in "Londonmaxxing" and "Britmaxxing" which was how some in the tech industry are describing a wave of recent multi-billion pound investments in the sector. "I know people like to talk us down...or say that things aren't working but in this area there are huge reasons for us to feel confident and proud," he said. "We are an AI superpower any which way you look at it."
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
UK government will likely commission review of AI impact on employment within next 6 months
Likely · Within months
Cross-party tech investment initiative between Sunak and Lammy will gain momentum
Likely · Within months
Open Questions
- How quickly would National Insurance be phased out?
- What corporate tax rate would replace National Insurance contributions?
- How would the transition be managed to avoid budget shortfalls?
- What specific protections would be put in place for affected workers?






