Planned reforms would require physical parking tickets to be left on cars, ending the practice of mailing fines issued via camera cars.
The South Australian government plans to ban councils from issuing ticketless parking fines, requiring inspectors to leave physical tickets on vehicles rather than mailing them after camera car scans.
AI-generated summary
Councils in South Australia have used camera cars, such as Adelaide's Park Safe program, to scan for parking infractions and mail fines.
The South Australian government plans to ban councils from issuing ticketless parking fines.
Under the planned reforms, councils would be banned from posting fines to drivers after a camera car has driven past, and it would be mandatory for inspectors to leave a physical ticket on the car or hand it to the driver.
The South Australian premier highlighted the City of Adelaide's Park Safe program — which uses a car with cameras on top to scan for illegally parked cars and take high-quality photos — as an example.
The council has previously said the images are reviewed by trained officers to verify whether an offence has occurred.
A recent council report showed that on average, 25 per cent of contested fines were withdrawn following requests for reviews by parking information officers so far this year.
Tour bus operator Dallas Coull, who spoke at the government's press conference about the reforms, said he had never received fines before the Park Safe program but had received "dozens and dozens" since its implementation.
"There's actually a hotel in the CBD that don't pick up [at] anymore because we get kept getting fines," he said.
In nearby Rundle Mall, shopper Fiona Garwood welcomed the planned changes, saying she would "rather have things done by a person".
Fellow shopper Levi Adams said he had seen the council's Park Safe car in the CBD before and agreed with the government's proposed reforms.
"I'm concerned about AI in every aspect of life, so I really don't need it to be in parking fines as well. The less, the better, in my opinion," the 23-year-old said.
Mr Malinauskas said AI technology could still be used, but any ticket would need to be physically issued by a council inspector at the time of the alleged offence.
"If they've got someone in the car and someone gets out of the car, looks at the circumstances … that's OK," he said.
"It's the practice of the car and the AI machine only forming the judgement that we are regulating out."
Local Government Association of SA president Heather Holmes-Ross said it was "unusual" that the state government had not consulted them on the planned reforms, and questioned whether it would extend to other ticketless fine systems.
"The technology we're talking about is the same technology that's used by red light cameras, phone detection — it's all the same software — so we're a little confused about why it would be that just parking data is being attacked here and not all data that's collected by AI," she said.
But the state government said there was an "important distinction" between enforcing parking restrictions and road safety laws.
"Parking fines are mostly issued to stationary cars whereas that is clearly not the case for a speeding car," a spokesperson said.
The spokesperson said the state government would consult stakeholders, including the LGA.
Ms Holmes-Ross, who is also the mayor of Mitcham in Adelaide's inner-south, said there were several councils trialling the technology around the state in a bid to improve efficiency, with human oversight.
"If you drive past 10 or 20 cars, then that video can be viewed, and those fines can be mailed out," she said.
"If you're stopping and you're giving out those 20 individually, it just takes more time.
"So if there's a way of doing it accurately and more efficiently, it's better for everyone."
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
State government will consult stakeholders including the LGA on proposed reforms.
Very likely · Within weeks
New Zealand's election shows Labour and National separated by just 3,650 party votes out of more than 2.4 million counted, with National projected to win 42 seats to Labour's 36. The two major parties secured only 59% of the party vote, the first time below 60% since MMP was introduced in 1996, while turnout dipped to 74.6%, the second-lowest in New Zealand's history.
Kansas farmer Fred Levendofsky, a former Trump supporter, voted against him in the third election after fuel costs rose 40% and expenses jumped 50%. Democrat Adam Hamilton won the Senate seat, giving Democrats control of both chambers and complicating Trump's final two years in office.
Nationals leader Matt Canavan supports Australia remaining in the Paris Agreement but opposes the EU free trade deal, arguing it would legally bind Australia to net zero beyond current commitments. He also criticized the deal's impact on dairy farmers and said he would welcome nuclear power in Capricornia.

The Albanese government has reversed plans to sell four heritage-listed defence sites—Victoria Barracks in Sydney and Melbourne, Fort Queenscliff, and RAAF Base Point Cook—after public backlash. The sites will remain publicly owned and be transformed into public spaces with the Australian War Memorial, while sales of other metropolitan defence sites will proceed to fund housing and save upkeep costs.
Justice of the peace Loretta Cormack, volunteering for 51 years in Victoria, now offers services at Altona Bunnings, the first hardware store to host JPs. With active JP numbers estimated at around 2,000 and government JP training funding lapsed since 2021–2022, RVAHJ is calling for post-election funding for 5,000 new recruits.
Victoria's election campaign takes an unprecedented turn as Premier Ben Carroll's royal commission into the Big Build begins public hearings during the four-week campaign, while Opposition Leader Jess Wilson faces economist scrutiny over Coalition costings and fiscal plans.