
AI-generated summary
Slovakia does not permit same-sex marriage or civil partnerships, maintaining a constitutional definition of marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Despite this, Slovak citizens have increasingly married in neighbouring Austria, where same-sex marriage has been legal since 2019. The November 2025 ruling by the European Court of Justice in a case involving a Polish couple married in Berlin established that EU member states must recognise same-sex marriages validly concluded in another member state when the couple has exercised their right to free movement and resided there, even if the home state does not permit such unions.
A same-sex couple are suing authorities in Slovakia for refusing to register their Austrian marriage, testing whether a landmark EU court ruling can turn recognition abroad into legal security at home.
Their fight exposes a clash between European obligations and national restrictions – and what that means for LGBTQ+ people living under Robert Fico’s populist-nationalist government.
Ivan Novotný, 31, and Metod Špaček, 51, married in Austria in 2020, but six years on, their marital status at home remains unrecognised.
There is no same-sex marriage in Slovakia, a socially conservative, predominantly Catholic country; neither is there any form of civil partnership.
But Novotný and Špaček, who are both lawyers and former diplomats, are not asking for that. They want the Slovakian authorities to recognise a marriage that was concluded legally in another EU country – something the bloc’s top court has said is mandatory for all EU members.
“I’ve said this publicly several times, and [LGBTQ+] activists in Slovakia have criticised me for it: Metod and I are not discriminated against here. We have a lovely life here in Bratislava, in Slovakia,” Novotný said. “So, we don’t actually need [recognition of marriage] for our day-to-day lives.”
For example, said Novotný, when Špaček was hospitalised during the Covid pandemic he was treated by a “lovely” doctor who recognised Novotný’s official relationship to her patient.
He added: “She put me down on the report as ‘husband’ and gave me all your [Špaček] medical information. The problem is: that was because she was nice, not because she had to do it. If someone wanted to make trouble for us, they could do it.
“That’s not how the rule of law should work.”
The couple argue they are on solid legal ground after a ruling by the EU’s highest court in November 2025 in response to a case brought by a Polish same-sex couple who had married in Berlin.
Jakub Cupriak-Trojan and Mateusz Trojan had challenged the Mazovia provincial governor’s refusal to recognise their German marriage. The court ruled that member states must recognise such marriages where couples had exercised their right to move and reside in another EU country, and created or strengthened family life there.
The European court of justice ruling does not require member states to allow same-sex weddings at home.
The Slovakian authorities explained why Novotný and Špaček’s request to register their Austrian marriage had been turned down in a letter signed by the interior minister, Matúš Šutaj Eštok.
“[The letter] says that since the constitutional definition of marriage [in Slovakia] is a bond between a man and a woman, they lack the legal basis for formally recognising the marriage certificate. That’s essentially it,” said Špaček, who served as chief of staff to the country’s liberal former president Zuzana Čaputová.
Across town, in the house his grandparents built on a hill overlooking the Danube, Marián Žáry Kukelka, 44, recalled his wedding to his partner, Ondrej, in 2023. The couple married in Hainburg an der Donau, an Austrian town visible from their terrace.
Žáry Kukelka, a radio presenter for the public broadcaster STVR, is also suing Slovakian authorities. He uses his full married name on air (Žáry is Ondrej’s surname) and is supported by his colleagues. But his official documents refer to him as Marián Kukelka. He said: “It’s a court case for love. I don’t need that surname to live my life, but for me it’s a kind of tribute to my partner, that I can carry his surname too.”.
Žáry Kukelka lives behind Bratislava Castle, not far from Zámocká street – the scene of the homophobic attack in 2022 where two people were shot dead outside the LGBTQ+ bar Tepláreň.
The anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric of many Slovakian politicians, especially in the government, was contributing to an atmosphere of increasing hostility, he said.
Last year, Fico’s government backed constitutional changes recognising only two sexes and tightening adoption restrictions. Žáry Kukelka told the Guardian that Hainburg an der Donau had been “overwhelmed” with LGBTQ+ couples from Slovakia wanting to get married since a change to Austrian legislation made it possible.
He himself had experienced little in the way of abuse as a gay man, he said, although he admitted he thought carefully before using the words “my husband”, depending on whom he was talking to.
“Two weeks ago, we were in Switzerland, and there we held hands in public for the first time in a long time,” he said. “We felt it was different there.”
Slovakia’s interior ministry said it was bound by the country’s existing constitutional and legal framework, regardless of whether a marriage was valid abroad.
It acknowledged the primacy of EU law but argued that recognition for freedom of movement purposes did not require registration as a marriage. Its administrative work “cannot replace decisions by the legislature or the constitutional legislature,” the ministry told the Guardian.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Slovak courts will rule in favor of recognizing the Austrian marriages of Novotný and Špaček and Žáry Kukelka based on the November 2025 ECJ ruling.
Likely · Within months
The Slovak government will appeal any court decision requiring registration of foreign same-sex marriages, citing constitutional sovereignty.
Likely · Within months

A coronial inquest into the death of six-year-old Elizabeth Struhs heard that child safety staff dismissed doctors' warnings and returned her to her parents in 2019 despite concerns over their religious beliefs regarding medicine.

A podcast by The Australian, 'Shadow of Doubt', caused a 10-month delay in the trial of William 'Rob' Gilfillan, a convicted paedophile, after it questioned his previous abuse convictions and fueled online speculation, compromising jury impartiality.

U.S. lawmakers and officials are increasingly turning to alternative capital punishment methods, including firing squads, due to lethal injection supply-chain issues and high-profile botched executions across multiple states.

International Criminal Court judges have ruled that former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte is mentally fit to stand trial for crimes against humanity. The trial, concerning his 'war on drugs' campaign, is scheduled to commence on November 30.

A Tennessee judge ordered state officials to preserve all evidence from the botched execution attempt on Christa Pike, including drugs and equipment, after she survived lethal injections and remains hospitalized with pneumonia, a blood clot, and shackled to her bed despite medical pleas to remove restraints.

The US Supreme Court heard arguments on whether the Air Force can continue using Tarague Beach in Guam to detonate unexploded ordnance, a case challenging environmental compliance and highlighting territorial residents' limited influence on federal decisions affecting their land and resources.