Justice Bhuyan says the detachment expected of police officers appears to be disappearing, calling it a matter of grave concern.
Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan criticised police for allegedly assaulting protesting students during the NEET agitation at Jantar Mantar, warning that lawbreaking by officials breeds lawlessness.
AI-generated summary
Supreme Court scrutiny follows alleged use of force by Delhi Police during July 20 student protests at Jantar Mantar.
NEW DELHI: Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan criticised police officers over the alleged assault on protesting students during the NEET agitation at Jantar Mantar and said that the detachment expected of officials appears to be disappearing.
While speaking at the launch of former secretary (security) Yashovardhan Azad's book "Policing the Republic", Justice Bhuyan said that police must maintain their credibility because people seek their help when they feel wronged.
"All of us are dismayed when we see young officers of the Indian Police Service personally going and assaulting protesters and demonstrators. This is something very, very distressing to observe. The detachment expected of police officers somehow seems to be disappearing, and this is indeed a matter of grave concern," Justice Bhuyan said.
"For most common people, a policeman on the street wearing a whistle and a lathi represents the power and authority of the state. When they feel wronged, they seek the help of the police. It is, therefore, of utmost importance that the police force maintains its credibility. It can do so only by strictly adhering to the Constitution, by functioning as a truly professional force, acting impartial, displaying courage and acting with conviction, maintaining integrity and adhering to secular principles, thereby upholding the rule of law," he said.
The Supreme Court judge further said that if government functionaries become lawbreakers, it is bound to breed contempt for the law and encourage lawlessness.
"If the functionaries of the government become lawbreakers, it is bound to breed contempt for the law and will encourage lawlessness. No civilised nation can permit that to happen. Does a citizen shed his fundamental right the moment a policeman arrests him?" Justice Bhuyan said.
The alleged use of force by Delhi Police during the July 20 student protests at Jantar Mantar and the march towards Parliament has come under the Supreme Court's scrutiny, with the court constituting a high-level panel to examine complaints of excessive force.
The panel, headed by former Supreme Court judge Justice R Subhash Reddy, will investigate allegations against Delhi Police and examine evidence including CCTV footage and videos of the protests.
Among the allegations to be examined are the use of lathis, tear gas, pellet guns and electronic batons, as well as claims of targeted harassment and molestation of women protesters.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
High-level panel will examine complaints and evidence regarding Delhi Police conduct.
Very likely · Within weeks
In 2026, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court sided with the town of Nahant, upholding its use of eminent domain to take a 12-acre coastal parcel from Northeastern University and preserve it as open space.
The Delhi High Court appointed advocate Gautam Bhatia as amicus curiae in actor Janhvi Kapoor's petition against alleged unauthorized use of her identity online, including sexually explicit content and commercial exploitation. The court previously ordered removal of 552 URLs and is categorizing thousands of links to determine legal limits of personality rights in the digital space, with similar proceedings underway for actor Vivek Oberoi.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that Bengaluru municipal authorities cannot impose post-facto land relinquishment conditions for road widening as a prerequisite for issuing occupancy certificates, upholding property rights under Article 300A of the Constitution and finding no statutory basis in the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act, 2024 or BBMP Act for such demands.
A US district court in Massachusetts heard arguments in a lawsuit challenging a DHS rule that replaces the 'duration of status' visa system for international students and exchange visitors with fixed four-year admission periods, effective September 15, 2026.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court granted anticipatory bail to a 78-year-old retired IFS officer, Jayaramaiah, accused in a multi-state fraud case. The court ruled that receiving illicit funds in one's account does not automatically prove criminal complicity.
The Gujarat High Court dismissed as withdrawn an appeal by former cricketer and MP Yusuf Pathan against a single-judge order labeling him an encroacher on a Vadodara plot.