India's Supreme Court ruled that deletion of deceased, relocated, or duplicate names during Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls is valid, and that for Andhra Pradesh local body elections, the final voter list available on the election notification date — either post-SIR or the Jan 1, 2026 list — will be used, rejecting YSR Congress Party's plea to defer polls.
AI-generated summary
The YSR Congress Party appealed against the Andhra Pradesh High Court's decision rejecting its plea to defer local body elections until the finalisation of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, which aims to remove deceased, relocated, and duplicate voter entries.
NEW DELHI: Supreme Court Friday said there is nothing wrong in deletion of names of the dead, and those who have either shifted out from the ward or duplicate names during Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls but said that on the date of notification of elections, the voter list which is final - either the post-SIR list or the one on Jan 1, 2026, would be used for local body polls in Andhra Pradesh. A bench of chief justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana refused to entertain YSR Congress Party's appeal against Andhra Pradesh high court's decision rejecting its plea for deferment of local body elections till finalisation of SIR of electoral rolls.
The bench said SIR is a necessity as those who have passed away or shifted cannot be allowed to vote in the wards. The duplicate voters' names also are required to be struck down, and these are the anomalies that are taken care of through SIR, it said. On the plea that HC has directed finalisation of post-SIR voter list by Oct 16, the bench said as per the legislations governing the panchayat, municipalities and municipal corporations, the elections would be held based on the final voter list available on the date when the EC notifies the elections. When the SEC said that the election dates have not been notified and that it would be bound to take the final voter list available on the election notification date, the bench agreed and said if for some reason the post-SIR final electoral rolls are not published prior to the election notification, then the EC would consider holding polls based on the voter list as finalised on Jan 1, 2026.
Justice Sheel Nagu recused from hearing Punjab government's appeal against a High Court order directing a CBI probe into an alleged bribe syndicate linked to the Chief Minister's OSD, after Justice Dipankar Datta noted concerns about potential controversies and external pressures on judicial impartiality.
The Supreme Court criticized Jharkhand's DGP appointment process for violating its Prakash Singh judgement on residual tenure requirements, issued a notice to Tadasha Mishra appointed a day before retirement, and directed the state to revisit its 2025 regulations while allowing it to file a counter-affidavit in defense.
The Supreme Court of India is set to hear petitions filed by editors of 'The Hindu' and 'Murasoli' newspapers regarding a 2003 Tamil Nadu assembly resolution that led to arrest warrants against journalists, with the assembly having since withdrawn the resolution, rendering the case academic after nearly 23 years of pendency.
The Supreme Court revived a Look Out Circular against the parents of an NRI father who secretly took his three-and-a-half-year-old daughter to the US without informing his wife, warning them to face legal consequences if he does not return the child to India within four weeks.
An Arizona appeals court ordered a resentencing for Gabriel Paul Horcasitas, convicted of a 2021 road-rage killing, ruling that an AI-generated video of the victim 'forgiving' the shooter presented fabricated thoughts and rendered the sentencing process unfair.
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ordered Gruha Kalyan Proprietorship Firm to refund homebuyers with 9% interest and compensation after a Bengaluru housing project was stalled for over two decades.