The Supreme Court directed the Odisha government to decide on Dara Singh's remission plea by September 17, warning that the state's secretary would be summoned if no decision is taken, after multiple adjournments due to the advocate-on-record's illness.
AI-generated summary
The Supreme Court is hearing a remission plea filed by Dara Singh, a convict, and has previously adjourned the case multiple times to allow the Odisha government to decide on the plea.
‘You can’t keep it lingering’: SC
NEW DELHI: Pulling up Odisha govt over its indecisiveness on taking a call on the remission plea of Dara Singh, SC Tuesday said the state cannot linger on the issue and made it clear that the official (secretary) concerned will be summoned if decision is not taken by Sept 17, the next date of hearing. A bench of Justices Manoj Misra and Vijay Bishnoi expressed displeasure after Odisha govt sought a four-week adjournment on the ground of illness of its advocate-on-record (AoR). Deferring the hearing, the court made it clear that no adjournment will be granted on the next date. "You cannot keep it lingering like this. Take a decision, accept or reject. You cannot avoid taking decision," the bench said. Noting that hearing in the case had been adjourned multiple times to allow the state to take a call on the remission plea, the court at the previous hearing also expressed displeasure over State Sentence Review Board not having made a decision yet. SC made it clear to state govt that it would have to pass an order if the authority did not make a decision.
End of Article
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Odisha government will take a decision on Dara Singh's remission plea by September 17, 2026.
Likely · Within weeks

The Allahabad High Court has canceled the detention of Delhi University student Akriti Chaudhary in Noida under the National Security Act (NSA), terming it as wrong. Accusing the police and administrative officials of fabricating facts, the court has ordered a compensation of Rs 5 lakh from their salary.
India's Supreme Court ruled that corporations can be convicted and punished for crimes even if they lack mens rea or face mandatory imprisonment, stating that judicial discretion to impose fines instead of jail terms must be read into such provisions for juristic persons, rejecting Sanofi India Ltd's plea challenging its prosecution in a CBI case involving inflated medicine prices supplied to Bhabha Atomic Research Centre.
The Delhi High Court has reserved its verdict on whether it has jurisdiction to hear a petition challenging show-cause notices issued by the Maharashtra FDA to actors Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn and Tiger Shroff over a chewing elaichi advertisement campaign alleged to be surrogate promotion of banned pan masala. The company PB Agro LLP argues the notices were issued only to brand ambassadors, not the company, and that the pan masala brand has not been sold in Maharashtra since 2001.
The Bombay High Court has ordered the State Bank of India (SBI) to pay Rs 5,000 per day to In Vogue Creations for losing original property documents held as loan security. The compensation applies from December 1, 2023, until the bank reconstructs the missing title records.
Mumbai's deputy charity commissioner deregistered a sharia court trust following complaints of illegal marriage dissolutions, highlighting a rising trend of extra-judicial divorces after triple talaq criminalization.
Supreme Court directed the Maharashtra government to immediately arrest politicians involved in assaulting doctors, following an incident where Shiv Sena office-bearers attacked hospital staff in Palghar district.