
Home Secretary faces criticism for allegedly extending 30-year settlement wait to refugees who previously expected a five-year path.
AI-generated summary
The government previously stated that a 30-year settlement wait would apply only to illegal entrants who are not refugees. Recent documents suggest this now includes refugees arriving via irregular routes.
Shabana Mahmood has been accused of causing “distress and uncertainty” to hundreds of thousands of refugees by quietly introducing plans to force them to wait up to 30 years before being granted the right to settle in the UK.
The Refugee Council said the home secretary’s hardening of plans came despite her personal reassurances last year that only “illegal entrants who are not refugees will face a 30-year wait for settlement”.
In a further tightening of the rules, a cohort of 200,000 successful asylum applicants who were told they could apply for indefinite leave to remain after five years will now face reviews of their status every 30 months.
Mahmood announced a series of immigration proposals on Monday, some of which softened the rules for care workers and their families after unions, cabinet members and backbench Labour MPs voiced their concerns.
Refugees who arrive by irregular means, by small boat for example, will face a 30-year wait for settlement in the UK under the new plans.
Last year’s consultation included a proposal that people who arrived irregularly would face a 10-year penalty for having done so. However, this was not expected to apply to those who had been granted refugee status.
Mahmood wrote last year that refugees would be spared the 10-year penalty. In a post on the social media platform X on 21 November 2025, she shared an image of the white cliffs of Dover, with the words: “Illegal entrants who are not refugees will face a 30-year wait for settlement.”
The House of Commons library pointed to Mahmood’s post as evidence that only “non-refugees who secured their visa after illegal entry or overstaying would take up to 30 years”.
In March, the government reassured hundreds of thousands of asylum claimants that they would be able to apply for settlement in the UK after five years as long as their application had already been submitted.
An explanatory memo at the time said: “Adults and accompanied and unaccompanied children granted 5 years leave as a result of an asylum claim or further submissions made by 1 March 2026 will remain eligible to apply for settlement after 5 years.”
That guarantee has been quietly dropped in the small print of the government’s latest immigration plan which was released on Monday.
According to footnote 14 in the Home Office document A fairer pathway to settlement: “Those refugees, not on safe and legal routes, who claimed asylum before 2 March 2026 will move to Core Protection.”
Under the Home Office’s core protection scheme, adults and their children receive an initial period of only 30 months of permission to stay which must then be renewed. If conditions in their home country are considered safe, their refugee status can be revoked.
Jon Featonby, the chief policy analyst at the Refugee Council, said: “Keeping changing positions on what refugees should expect will cause distress and huge uncertainty. Thousands of refugees who thought they were just weeks or months away from being able to access settlement could now have to wait for another 25 years.
“It is impossible to expect people to start new lives while living with a temporary status that expires every 30 months for 30 years. That’s decades of fear and uncertainty for people who have already faced war, conflict and persecution and simply want to be safe here.
“These plans will also cause chaos for the Home Office, which will now have decades of repeated extra applications to process at enormous cost to the public purse.”
Responding to the Refugee Council’s analysis, the Home Office said there had been no policy change since last year’s proposals but declined to comment further on Mahmood’s comments on X or the footnote in the Home Office’s recent document.
She told MPs on Monday: “The right to live in the UK for ever will no longer be granted to migrants almost automatically after five years. Instead, it will be earned, under the new earned settlement model set out before parliament today.”

The UK government is considering a 50% reduction in the noise limit for consumer fireworks to address concerns from pet owners and veterans with PTSD. Industry representatives warn that such measures could inadvertently fuel an illegal black market.

An official review led by Bernard Hogan-Howe recommends consolidating England's 39 police forces into nine regional 'super forces' to improve efficiency. The proposal faces internal debate among police chiefs and potential delays due to regional devolution agendas.

People riding e-bikes dangerously or while drunk could face on-the-spot fines under a new government consultation aimed at tackling nuisance parking and anti-social behaviour associated with shared e-bike schemes across the UK.

Democrats won Congress on an affordability platform after voters prioritized grocery and fuel costs over economic statistics. However, President Trump retains veto power, meaning Democrats need a two-thirds majority to pass legislation. Their agenda includes healthcare, tariffs, energy, housing, and tax changes, but legislative deadlock is likely for the next two years.

More than 1,650 asbestos items have been identified across the Palace of Westminster and wider parliamentary estate, an increase of 500 since 2021, as MPs face a vote on a refurbishment costing up to £40bn and taking 61 years. The Commons public accounts committee warned delay costs taxpayers £420m per year, while campaigners and bereaved families urge a precautionary approach and national asbestos register.

The UK government is considering restrictions on smart glasses, including limiting sales to certain users, after concerns were raised that men are using the devices to secretly film women in public spaces. Safeguarding minister Satvir Kaur said the government is weighing benefits against harms, while Liberal Democrat MP Anna Sabine called for regulation before it is too late.