
The Venice Commission issued a recommendation regarding the situation with the swearing in of judges of the Constitutional Tribunal.
AI-generated summary
The dispute concerns the oath taken by six Constitutional Tribunal judges elected by the Sejm on March 13.
The committee's recommendation states that the oath must be administered in an appropriate form and duly confirmed by a notarial deed presented to the president.
This option can be used if the president refuses or delays conducting the judge's swearing-in ceremony.
In its position, the Commission also indicated that it should be ensured that the president immediately takes the oath of office from Constitutional Tribunal judges elected by the Sejm, without claiming the right to electoral control.
More information coming soon…
Dispute over new judges of the Constitutional Tribunal
The dispute concerns the oath taken by six Constitutional Tribunal judges elected by the Sejm on March 13. President Karol Nawrocki took the oath only from Dariusz Szostek and Magdalena Bentkowska, considering that in the case of the remaining four, procedural requirements had not been met.
The ruling coalition and Justice Minister Waldemar Żurek are of the opinion that the president cannot selectively assess the choice made by the Sejm; four judges took the oath in the Sejm and submitted their written orders to the Chancellery of the President. However, the President of the Constitutional Tribunal, Bogdan Święczkowski, did not allow them to perform their duties, pointing to the lack of information from the president about taking the oath.
What is the Venice Commission?
The Venice Commission is the common name of the European Commission for Democracy through Law. It is an advisory body to the Council of Europe - an international organization that deals with, among others, protection of human rights, democracy and the rule of law.
It was established in 1990. Its headquarters is in Venice, hence the commonly used name.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Further legal disputes regarding the status of Constitutional Tribunal judges
Likely · Within weeks

The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration proposes to amend Art. 264a of the Penal Code, which will introduce a penalty of up to three years in prison for enabling or facilitating the stay of a migrant staying illegally in Poland, even if the action is not motivated by financial or personal gain. The project is intended to close a legal loophole used by people helping migrants under humanitarian pretexts.

The Parliament adopted an amendment to the Population Registration Act, giving insurers access to the series, number and expiration date of the PESEL register, which relieves customers of the obligation to update their data.

The Chamber of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court received a request to waive the immunity of prosecutor Michał Ostrowski. Investigators accuse him of using company cars for private commuting without the consent of his superiors, which was intended to expose taxpayers to costs.

The prosecutor's complaint in the Marcin Romanowski case decided that the detention case would be heard by a randomly selected judge from outside the special complaints section of the Court of Appeal, which includes, among others: Piotr Schab, Przemysław Radzik and Michał Lasota.

Children's Rights Ombudsman Monika Horna-Cieślak states on Radio RMF24 that she does not regret the intervention in the case of domestic violence in Białołęka, after which the court took the children away from their parents. She also referred to the prosecutor's office investigation and the CBA visit.

The court found that the search warrants used by Thames Valley Policy to enter the homes of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor after his arrest in February were unlawful because they had an inappropriate legal basis. The secured documents and electronic devices will remain at the disposal of the police until the next hearing in 2027, unless they are returned and secured again on another basis. The investigation into improper performance of a public function is related to the provision of confidential information to Jeffrey Epstein in 2010, which Mountbatten-Windsor consistently denies.