South Korea to Avoid Tariffs Beyond Trade Deal, Minister Says
Quick Look
- South Korean Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan stated that the U.S.
- Commerce Secretary reaffirmed South Korea will not face tariffs exceeding the bilateral trade deal.
- This follows the USTR's proposal of tariffs on goods from 60 economies over forced labor import bans.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The U.S. Trade Representative's office proposed tariffs on goods from 60 economies due to alleged failure to enforce import bans on goods produced with forced labor. This action falls under Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act. South Korea is concerned about potential tariffs exceeding its bilateral trade agreement with the U.S.
SEOUL, June 4 (Yonhap) -- Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said Thursday his U.S. counterpart has reaffirmed that South Korea will not face greater tariffs than agreed under the bilateral trade deal between the two countries, following the office of the U.S. Trade Representative's (USTR) recent announcement of the results of the Section 301 probe into imports related to forced labor.
Kim said in a social media post that he held talks with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick via a video call on Wednesday, shortly after the office of the USTR proposed imposing tariffs of 10 percent, or 12.5 percent, on imported goods from 60 economies over their alleged failure to enforce an import ban on goods produced with forced labor.
South Korea, China and Japan are among 54 economies that could be subject to the proposed 12.5 percent tariff as a result of the USTR's forced labor probe under Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act.
"We reviewed the implementation status of the Korea-U.S. tariff agreement finalized last year and reaffirmed our commitment to upholding the deal," Kim wrote.
"In particular, the U.S. side once again confirmed that no tariffs beyond the level agreed under last year's tariff deal will be imposed on South Korea," he added, vowing to make efforts to ensure that the balance of interests secured through the bilateral deal is protected.
Under the deal finalized late last year, the U.S. agreed to lower its reciprocal tariffs on South Korea to 15 percent from 25 percent in exchange for Seoul's US$350 billion investment pledge.
Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo has also urged the U.S. to resolve pending trade issues between the two countries, including the USTR's latest tariff move, within the boundaries of the Seoul-Washington deal, according to the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Resources.
Yeo made the call in a meeting with USTR Jamieson Greer on the sidelines of the OECD Ministerial Council Meeting held in Paris on Wednesday (local time).
"I made it clear that not only the outcomes of the latest Section 301 probe but also other future bilateral trade issues should be addressed within the framework of the Korea-U.S. tariff agreement rather than through the imposition of new tariffs," Yeo said in a press release.
"We will continue to work closely with the U.S. side and respond calmly to the remaining Section 301 procedures to ensure that bilateral trade issues are managed in a stable and constructive manner," Yeo added.
South Korea is also subject to a separate USTR investigation into what it calls "unfair" trade practices related to "structural" excess capacity and production, along with China, Japan and 13 other economies.
The U.S. has been carrying out trade investigations to replace country-specific "reciprocal" tariffs that were struck down by the Supreme Court in February. Section 301 is a legal provision that allows the USTR to investigate unfair foreign trade practices on a country-by-country basis.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The U.S. will continue to pursue Section 301 investigations into unfair trade practices.
Very likely · Medium term
South Korea will continue to advocate for trade issues to be resolved within the existing bilateral framework.
Very likely · Medium term
Open Questions
- Will the U.S. proceed with the proposed tariffs on the 60 economies, and if so, what will be the specific impact on each?
- What specific criteria did the USTR use to determine the 'failure to enforce an import ban on goods produced with forced labor' for each of the 60 economies?
- How will South Korea's $350 billion investment pledge be factored into future trade dispute resolutions?
- What are the next steps in the separate USTR investigation into South Korea's 'unfair' trade practices related to excess capacity and production?






