
AI-generated summary
The ads in question were initially funded through a budget shift in the Office of Management and Budget that moved $20 million from Customs and Border Protection funds to a category for commemorative events, according to reporting by The New York Times.
President Donald Trump said Monday evening that he and his political action committee will pay for controversial television ads that praised him, and which reportedly were funded from up to $20 million set aside by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
The White House later clarified that the super PAC — MAGA Inc. — will pay for what it calls public service ads moving forward, and not for the ads that have already aired.
Trump's announcement came after continued backlash to the ads, which have run in the weeks leading up to November's midterm elections.
Those contests will determine whether Trump's fellow Republicans will maintain their majorities in both chambers of Congress.
Critics say the ads mirror Republican campaign talking points. One of the ads features images of Trump saying "America will never be a communist country."
"The Radical Left is upset with the fact that I am taking Ads, which I consider to be a positive promotion for our Great U.S.A., and paying for them with U.S.A. money," Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Monday.
"This is a rather standard thing to do but, rather than doing that, although nothing will make them happy, I have decided to do the Patriotic Ads, among others, and pay for them myself, and with money I raised for MAGA, Inc.," Trump said.
AdImpact has tracked roughly $9.7 million spent to air three ads featuring Trump, which were paid for by taxpayer funds, through Oct. 5.
Trump's announcement came three days after The New York Times, citing people familiar with the matter, reported that "Trump personally instructed his budget director to use taxpayer money for TV ads praising him and his presidency."
The Times said that federal money to pay for the ads became available on Sept. 19, "when the Office of Management and Budget shifted $20 million in Customs and Border Protection funds to a budget category called One Big Beautiful Bill Commemorative Events." Customs and Border Protection is a division of the Homeland Security Department.
Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., in a Sept. 24 letter to White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, wrote, "The advertisement does not have a clear official government purpose and appears to run afoul of federal prohibitions against the use of appropriated funds as part of 'a general propaganda effort designed to aid a political party or candidates.'"
Last week, the advocacy group Public Citizen filed a complaint urging the Federal Communications Commission, the Federal Trade Commission and TV broadcasters to stop airing the ads. Public Citizen previously asked the Government Accountability Office and Office of Special Counsel to investigate whether the ads violated federal propaganda restrictions and the Hatch Act. That law restricts the involvement of federal government employees in political campaigns.
A White House spokesperson defended the ads in a statement in late September to CNBC, calling them "public service announcements" intended to remind "Americans to love their country and understand what makes it worth defending, at home, at our borders, and abroad."
"The ad is educational and unapologetically patriotic. We should be proud of our country," the spokesperson said.
MAGA Inc. has raised $424.4 million and spent $32.4 million during the 2025-26 cycle through Aug. 31, leaving the Trump Super PAC with $415.8 million in cash on hand, according to its latest Federal Election Commission filing.
MAGA Inc. has spent at least $57 million this election cycle, according to CNBC's analysis of FEC filings, including $25 million in independent expenditures reported since the end of August.
— CNBC's Luke Fountain contributed to this article
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Federal Election Commission will review MAGA Inc.'s financial disclosures related to the ad payments
Likely · Within weeks
Congressional Democrats will continue to call for investigations into the use of taxpayer funds for the ads
Very likely · Within days

US President Donald Trump announced that taxpayer funds will no longer be used for television ads featuring him, stating the costs will instead be covered by his MAGA Inc. super PAC. The ads, which aired since late September and cost at least $1.5 million in federal funds, have drawn criticism from lawmakers and ethics experts over potential violations of government propaganda restrictions. Trump described the ads as a 'positive promotion for our Great USA' and confirmed he would pay for them personally and through his PAC, though he did not say whether past expenditures would be reimbursed.

President Donald Trump announced he will stop using taxpayer funds for television advertisements featuring himself following widespread criticism. The ads, which aired ahead of the November midterm elections and cost at least $1.5 million in federal funds, were defended by Trump as a positive promotion for the U.S. but will now be funded by him or his MAGA PAC. Ethics experts and lawmakers from both parties have called for independent investigations into the use of public funds for the campaign-style spots.

The White House blocked POLITICO from boarding Air Force One to perform print pool duties, escalating tensions over media access after Trump's attempted bans on POLITICO, CNN, and MS NOW were temporarily restrained by a federal judge, with outlets arguing the actions violate constitutional rights and seek judicial intervention.

President Donald Trump stated that the United States moved all long-range bombers from the United Kingdom in response to a threat linked to Iran, following a probe that uncovered a planned terror attack. The B-1 bombers were withdrawn from RAF Fairford and redeployed to U.S. bases.

Rep. Don Davis introduced the 'No Betting on Your Own Race Act' to ban federal candidates from trading on prediction market contracts related to their own elections, citing concerns about insider trading and public trust, following a controversy involving his opponent Laurie Buckhout who traded on her own race and settled with Kalshi.

Australia's two-decade offshore asylum policy, involving processing seekers in Papua New Guinea and Nauru, has cost over AU$13 billion and faced human rights abuse allegations, serving as a cautionary example for the EU and US as they explore similar third-country migration deals despite documented failures and legal challenges.