Fund crisis question from the famous economist to Şimşek: What would he answer in Bangkok?

There is no need to read the intentions of Mehmet Şimşek or whoever replaces him to see the difficulty he would face if he went to Bangkok. What would he answer to a concrete question about the funding crisis in Türkiye?

If he said that the entire process was not under his control, the narrative of autonomous and powerful economic management presented to the outside would be open to discussion. If he said he was under control, he would have to explain why what was done this time was not enough to prevent the crisis. If he had been content with general messages of trust, the question of what the authority attributed to him corresponded to would remain open.

Moreover, the answer he would give there would not stay there. Explaining to foreign investors the reason for a decision that was not disclosed to citizens in Türkiye would also have consequences within the country. Who knew what, who had what power, who bore what responsibility? The search for trust outside would bring back the issue of accountability that had been postponed inside.