
AI-generated summary
In December 2025, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection issued a decision regarding misleading consumers during Biedronka promotions and imposed a fine of nearly PLN 105 million on Jeronimo Martins Polska. The case concerned the promise of a 100% refund. the value of purchased products into vouchers, which could only be used under certain conditions, unknown during the purchase. The court of first instance had previously upheld decisions regarding the practice of using contractual advantage (PLN 506 million fine) and irregularities related to the so-called anti-inflation shield (PLN 160 million fine).
The Court of Competition and Consumer Protection confirmed that Biedronka misled consumers and shared the assessment of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection regarding the intentional nature of the violations, reducing the fine to almost PLN 84 million - the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection reported on Tuesday.
The Office's announcement recalled that in December 2025, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection issued a decision regarding misleading consumers during Biedronka promotions and imposed a fine of nearly PLN 105 million on Jeronimo Martins Polska. The case concerned the promise of a 100% refund. the value of purchased products into vouchers, which could only be used under certain conditions, unknown during the purchase. The company appealed against the decision.
The Office of Competition and Consumer Protection pointed out that this is another decision of the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection confirming the decisions of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection towards Jeronimo Martins Polska. Earlier, the court of first instance upheld the decisions regarding the practice of using contractual advantage, awarding a fine of PLN 506 million, as well as irregularities related to the so-called anti-inflation shield, awarding a fine of PLN 160 million. The decisions are awaiting verification by the court of second instance, explained the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection.
He also informed that the case of discrepancies between prices on shelves and at checkouts and incorrect labeling of the country of origin of vegetables and fruit, in which the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection won against the company, had been legally resolved. The company paid fines of PLN 115 million and PLN 60 million, respectively.
The Office noted that this was not the first time that the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection drew attention to Biedronka's method of informing about promotions. The Office has repeatedly indicated to the company that the benefits and limitations of offers should be presented equally clearly. The company was also the addressee of two binding decisions regarding the communication of promotion rules, the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection reported.
The announcement added that the evidence also shows that when preparing the "Valentine's Day Wednesday" advertisement, Jeronimo Martins Polska consciously refrained from providing information on what products the voucher can be used for and how much you have to spend on subsequent purchases. This, as well as other circumstances indicated in the decision of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection, confirm the intentional nature of the violation - added the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection.
The judgment of the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection is not final and the company may appeal against it to the Court of Appeal in Warsaw. The Office noted that the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection also intends to file an appeal regarding the reduction of the fine. The Office maintains the position that the originally imposed sanction was adequate to the nature and gravity of the identified violations, it added.
"We consider the fact that our arguments were heard and taken into account by an independent court, which changed the original decision issued by the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection, as a step in the right direction. We will carefully analyze the written justification of the judgment as soon as we receive it, and we reserve the decision on possible further steps in this matter for later. We assure all Biedronka customers that we will continue to offer them the most competitive promotional offer on the Polish market," the office told the Polish Press Agency Biedronka press releases.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Jeronimo Martins Polska will appeal to the Court of Appeal in Warsaw.
Likely · Within weeks
The President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection will appeal in the part regarding the reduction of the fine.
Likely · Within weeks

On November 10, the General Assembly of Judges of the Constitutional Tribunal will be held on, among others, changes to organizational regulations. Judge Anna Korwin-Piotrowska pointed out that many issues are archaic.

A Norwegian appeals court ruled unanimously that 29-year-old Marius Borg Høiby, son of Queen Mette-Marit, will not leave the royal residence near Oslo, where he is staying with an electronic bracelet on his leg. The court rejected the prosecutor's appeal against the decision of the first-instance court, which allowed the convict's conditional release on condition of regular reports to the police, alcohol and drug tests and continued treatment. The prosecutor's office appealed the decision after a recent test showed the presence of alcohol in Høiby's system, despite the alcohol ban in force. The appeals court found that the key issue was the risk of Høiby returning to substance use after his possible release.

The vast majority of Poles (61%) believe that the right to care for a child should depend on actual care, not blood ties. These results coincide with a hearing before the Supreme Administrative Court regarding the transcription of the birth certificate of a child raised by two mothers.

Judge Anna Korwin-Piotrowska was selected to hear the disciplinary case against Bartłomiej Sochański, but she will submit an application for exclusion because she herself issued an order on a break in his office. The General Assembly of Judges of the Constitutional Tribunal also adopted a budget resolution for 2027 and established a quorum of eight people.

The Wuhan authorities, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Wuhan Institute of Virology filed a lawsuit on April 30, 2025 against the state of Missouri and two former attorneys general, Eric Schmitt and Andrew Bailey, demanding 356.437 billion yuan in damages and a public apology in the American and Chinese media. The court accepted the case on May 7, 2025, and in December, Catherine Hanaway, the current attorney general of Missouri, was added to the list of defendants. The lawsuit is part of cross-border Covid-19 related litigation that began in 2020 when Eric Schmitt sued the Chinese government.

The First President of the Supreme Court, Zbigniew Kapiński, convened an extraordinary General Assembly of Supreme Court judges regarding the situation in the Constitutional Tribunal. The lack of a quorum prevented the adoption of a resolution, therefore the gathered judges supported the position of the Supreme Court Collegium opposing the removal of the President of the Constitutional Tribunal.