
The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals deemed the inclusion of 7.5 hours of work done during the week break in both the week holiday and overtime calculation as double payment.
The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals ruled that including 7.5 hours of work done during the week break in both the week holiday and overtime pay would constitute double payment.
AI-generated summary
The debt lawsuit filed by a welder after his employment contract was terminated was brought to the Supreme Court after the local court and appeal processes.
The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals made a remarkable decision that closely concerns millions of private sector employees. The department considered the inclusion of 7.5 hours of work done during the weekday holiday in both the holiday pay and overtime pay calculation as double payment. With the decision in question, workers working on weekly holidays will only receive their daily wage and will not be able to receive overtime.
The case started when the welder, who claimed that he was unfairly dismissed, went to the Labor Court. He stated that the employment contract was terminated verbally and verbally by the employer, that terminating the contract without asking the employee whether he has an excuse in case of absence is against the practices of the Supreme Court, and therefore severance and notice pay must be paid.
THE LABOR COURT DECIDED TO PARTLY ACCEPT THE CASE
Stating that he did not use his annual paid leave during his employment and that his wages were not paid, he requested that the defendant decide to collect severance and notice pay, annual paid leave, overtime pay, national holiday and general holiday pay and week holiday pay.
The defendant employer requested the dismissal of the case, arguing that the plaintiff's employment contract was terminated immediately for justified reasons, that the plaintiff employee did not work overtime and used his annual paid leaves.
The Labor Court ruled that the employer's unfair termination was made and that the demands for severance and notice pay were accepted, and that the case was partially accepted on the grounds that the employer was entitled to claims regarding working and rest periods.
THE DECISION WAS MOVED TO APPEAL
While the decision in question was brought to the court of appeal, the Regional Court of Justice decided to accept the case by abolishing the decision of the first instance court and making a new decision. When the defendant appealed the decision, the 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals stepped in.
In the decision made by the Department, it was stated that "If it is accepted to work seven days a week, seven and a half hours of the days falling on a week holiday are considered as a week holiday. It is not correct to rule that both week holiday and overtime will be received for the same work, which will cause double payment."
The Supreme Court ruled that the worker should receive his daily wage, not overtime, on the days that fall on a weekday, and said, "For this reason, while the seven and a half hour work per day that falls on a weekday should be excluded from the overtime account, the written decision was erroneous and required reversal."

Tissue samples were taken from the grave of Explorer Kozinoğlu, whose decision of non-prosecution was lifted after 15 years. As part of the investigation, allegations of suspicious death in prison, poisoning and murder possibilities are being investigated.

In the case filed by mold master Nadir Çalışkan, who lost his left eye as a result of a mold falling on his head during construction in İzmir Torbalı in 2020, the court found the workplace to be defective and awarded 738 thousand liras of material and 40 thousand liras of non-pecuniary compensation.

Constitutional Court President Kadir Özkaya stated that in the second individual application of Gezi Park case convict Tayfun Kahraman, it was decided that his rights to a fair trial and individual application were violated, and that the justification was in the process of being published.
Upon the request of the Silivri Chief Public Prosecutor's Office, the grave of former MİT officer Kaşif Kozinoğlu, who died in 2011, was opened in Ümraniye and an investigation was initiated to determine the cause of death.

15 years after his death, the grave of Explorer Kozinoğlu is being opened for the conquest of the grave. While allegations of poisoning and medication are being investigated with tissue samples to be taken, detention operations are also being carried out within the scope of the investigation.

Explorer Kozinoğlu's grave was opened after 15 years and bone, soil and tissue samples were taken. Within the scope of the investigation, whether a different drug was given in the prison and the suspicion of murder are being investigated.