The Metropolitan Police will expand its use of live facial recognition (LFR) technology, deploying static cameras in London's West End by Christmas and six other areas next year. Critics argue this forces citizens into a "digital police lineup," while the Met cites success in trials and potential crime-fighting benefits.
Western Australia Police will trial real-time facial recognition cameras in a marked van to scan crowds for wanted individuals, child sex offenders, and missing persons. The technology will cross-reference faces with a database, alerting officers to potential matches. Police aim to address privacy concerns by stating the system pixelates non-matches and deletes data immediately.
Western Australia will pilot real-time facial recognition cameras in police vans to scan crowds for wanted individuals, sex offenders, and missing persons. The technology will pixelate non-matches and delete data immediately, aiming to enhance community safety while addressing privacy concerns.
Live facial recognition technology is being used to fight crime, but raises concerns about surveillance and accuracy.
UK biometrics commissioners warn that AI facial recognition technology is outpacing legislation. With police and retailers expanding its use, critics highlight risks of misidentification, lack of accountability, and potential for malicious misuse of watchlists.
Several UK shoppers have reported being falsely accused of shoplifting due to errors in Facewatch facial recognition systems. Victims describe a lack of clear recourse and transparency, while critics warn that regulatory oversight is failing to keep pace with the technology.
The UK government is expanding the use of live facial recognition (LFR) technology across police forces to identify suspects in real-time. While authorities view it as a major crime-fighting tool, critics raise concerns about privacy, civil liberties, and potential bias.
Privacy campaigners have lost a High Court challenge aimed at limiting the Metropolitan Police's use of live facial recognition technology. Shaun Thompson and Silkie Carlo of Big Brother Watch argued the technology breaches human rights and privacy law, but the court rejected their claims in a 74-page ruling. Thompson, who was misidentified by the technology in February 2024, intends to appeal. The Met Police will continue using the technology, with plans to expand from 10 to 50 vans across England and Wales.
The High Court has ruled that the Metropolitan Police's use of Live Facial Recognition (LFR) technology is lawful, dismissing a human rights challenge brought by Shaun Thompson and Silkie Carlo of Big Brother Watch. Thompson was previously stopped and detained in February 2024 after LFR matched him with a different person on a police watchlist. The court found discrimination concerns were 'no more than faintly asserted' and that human rights had not been breached. Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley called it a 'significant victory for public safety'. Plans will expand LFR vans from 10 to 50 across England and Wales.
