
巴西警方正調查一起發生在最高法院外的可疑炸彈背包事件,嫌疑人已被逮捕。事件發生在總統大選前三天,現任總統魯拉與前總統波索納洛之佛拉維歐支持率不相上下。最高法院曾在2023年1月8日遭波索納洛支持者襲擊,後來將該事件定調為未遂政變。
AI-generated summary
巴西總統大選將於4日開始,民調顯示現任總統魯拉和前總統波索納洛之子佛拉維歐的支持率不相上下,可能需要進行第二輪投票。巴西最高法院過去也曾遭受過攻擊,2023年1月8日波索納洛的支持者闖入多棟設有政府機關的建築物,最高法院也成為目標之一,後來將該事件定調為1場未遂政變。
巴西警方正在調查1起疑似炸彈背包事件,炸彈被放置在最高法院外的1個背包中。圖為警方在事發區域站崗。(法新社)
巴西最高法院1日發布消息稱,警方正在調查1起疑似炸彈背包事件,炸彈被放置在該法院外的1個背包中。
根據《法新社》報導,位於巴西利亞的最高法院表示,嫌疑人1日將背包扔到法院外的公車站棚頂上,目前已被逮捕。
請繼續往下閱讀...
警方已封鎖事發現場,《法新社》記者在現場看到大約10幾輛巡邏車。軍警指出,拆彈小組正在趕往現場,將對該物品進行「嚴格的檢查程序」。
此事件發生時間點,距離巴西總統大選僅剩3天。巴西總統大選將於4日開始,民調顯示現任總統魯拉(Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva)和前總統波索納洛(Jair Bolsonaro)之子佛拉維歐(Flavio Bolsonaro)的支持率不相上下,可能需要進行第二輪投票。
另外巴西最高法院過去也遭受過攻擊。波索納洛的支持者2023年1月8日闖入多棟設有政府機關的建築物,最高法院也成為目標之一。最高法院後來將該事件定調為1場未遂政變,旨在推翻魯拉當年擊敗波索納洛並贏得總統大選的結果。
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
警方將完成對背包內容物的嚴格檢查程序
Very likely · Within hours
此事件將被納入總統大選的討論話題
Likely · Within days

Kaohsiung police and Pingtung police jointly investigated and found that a Pingtung citizen's house was a drug trafficking stronghold. They broke down the door and arrested a man surnamed Wen (35 years old) and a man surnamed Chen (48 years old). They seized more than 20 etomidate cartridges, e-cigarettes, e-liquids, amphetamines and other evidence on the spot. The two denied drug trafficking and said they were smoking, and the case was transferred to the Pingtung District Prosecutor's Office for investigation.

The Taoyuan District Court sentenced a man named Zeng to 2 years in prison, suspended for 3 years, for violating corruption regulations. When Zeng Nan served as a traffic police officer in 2022, after stopping and checking illegal drivers three times, he only issued fines for minor violations and failed to clamp down on unlicensed driving and other behaviors, resulting in three drivers receiving illegal benefits of 24,600 yuan.

The Hsinchu County Government stated that the well-known Tongzi Chicken restaurant located in Section 3 of Fulin Road, Xionglin Township, failed to apply for a construction license and a use license in accordance with the law. The county government sent personnel to post a notice of suspension of work and was treated as an illegal construction in accordance with the law. The address used to be a 7-ELEVEN supermarket, which was unable to operate due to land use issues. Netizens questioned whether the landlord was hiding land restrictions. The Industrial Development Department pointed out that those who resume work in violation of regulations may face a fixed-term imprisonment of less than one year or a fine of less than 30,000 yuan; the Agriculture Department added that the land belongs to agricultural and animal husbandry land in a specific agricultural area. In June 2022, it was fined 60,000 yuan by the Land Department for illegal use and transferred to the District Prosecutor's Office.

Yang Mengyin, the former director of neurosurgery oncology at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, and Zheng Wenyu, the former director of minimally invasive neurosurgery, were sentenced to 1 year and 4 months in prison and 1 year and 2 months respectively in the first instance, with both suspended for 4 years for appointing a medical material dealer without medical qualifications to perform surgeries on their behalf. The prosecutor believed that the original trial's application of the verdict was inconsistent and filed an appeal on the 2nd. The case also revealed that medical material vendors allegedly used 20% to 30% of sales as public relations fees to doctors. The five people involved in the case were also accused of fraudulently claiming health insurance and patient fees totaling 1.96 million yuan.

Su Wenshan, a candidate for mayor of Shilin District, was accused of organizing a free dinner party at a restaurant near the Shilin Night Market in April, entertaining eight tables of voting residents and publicly calling for voting. He was suspected of bribing voters with the dinner party. The investigation led to a search on September 24, and the investigation was expanded and it was discovered that He Yisong, the chairman of Shilin Shennong Palace, was suspected of co-funding the sponsorship of the dinner. He was re-interrogated on October 1 and was detained on suspicion of colluding with an accomplice and destroying evidence.

The Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the second instance and found that Hu Qingqing forged the seals of three sisters-in-law to issue five promissory notes with a face value of more than 880 million yuan, and attempted to commit financial fraud. He was sentenced to five years in prison for the five crimes of counterfeiting securities.