
李宜諪涉嫌協助詐騙集團脫產,一審判刑5個月,二審開庭提出繳納20萬元公益金換取緩刑。
知名網紅律師「仙塔律師」李宜諪涉入靈骨塔詐騙集團洗錢案,一審判刑5個月。二審高等法院今開庭,李女透過律師請求緩刑,並願繳納20萬元公益金。檢方則主張延長其限制出境出海處分。
AI-generated summary
李宜諪因涉嫌協助靈骨塔詐騙集團主嫌吳芳儀脫產,被控洗錢及洩密。一審判決洗錢罪成立,洩密罪無罪。
知名網紅「仙塔律師(Santa)」李宜諪,涉入「鉅新匯」靈骨塔詐騙集團詐騙長者1.6億元案,涉洩漏主嫌吳芳儀的偵查筆錄秘密,並於律師會見後,通知共犯陳永山變賣金飾及BMW名車,一審台北地院依洗錢罪判李女5個月徒刑,併科罰金8萬元,得易科罰金及易服勞役。案經上訴,高等法院今開庭審理,李宜諪透過辯護律師陳少璿,提出願繳納20萬元公益金作為條件,請求法官給予緩刑機會。
吳芳儀、呂英菖涉靈骨塔投資詐騙,去年4月遭檢方搜索,李宜諪受吳女律師趙浩程委託代班應訊,吳女遭聲押禁見後,李女在LINE群組轉述吳女指示,要求變賣手鍊、戒指及車輛,並稱吳女說「一定要賣,怕車子到時候被扣走」。
事後,吳女友人陳永山與蘇在與趙碰面後,也依照李宜諪的指示為吳女脫產;另外,蔡部分則是在陪呂應訊後,將呂涉及靈骨塔詐欺被收押等偵查內容,用LINE告訴陳。在偵查期間,李宜諪認罪,但被訴以後卻改口否認犯行,直到第三次開庭換了委任律師以後才認罪,並稱若被認定有犯罪所得,願全數繳回。
一審判決指出,李宜諪並未參與實行犯罪行為,應是基於幫助故意,對於陳及吳之洗錢行為資以助力,李女所為自應認構成幫助洗錢,判5個月徒刑。洩密部分,因證據指出李女並未交出任何資料,或對案外人談及案情等判其無罪。
律師趙浩程因無證據指出,陳與蘇在為吳女脫產是受其指示,一審判無罪。另名律師蔡沅諭部分,確實在本案偵查期間,透露「他同意認罪」訊息給陳永山,犯洩密罪判5個月徒刑。
案經上訴,高院今開庭審理,李宜諪的辯護律師陳少璿主張,檢方提起上訴並無理由,李女主觀上並無掩飾、隱匿自己犯罪所得的洗錢犯意;至於洩密部分則涉及法律適用爭議,檢方與原審法院法律見解不同,李女就事實部分坦承,是否涉及洩密的部分請庭上依法判決。
陳少璿進一步指出,李女有自白、無犯罪所得、無前科,且涉及洗錢部分的行為,目的並非協助吳芳儀脫產,但原審判決並未說明不予緩刑的理由,因此針對原科刑的部分上訴,並請求給予緩刑,願繳納公益金20萬元作為緩刑條件。
一審被判無罪的趙浩程則表示,檢方上訴無理由,尊重原審判決。一審被判5個月的蔡沅諭的辯護律師黃奕彰表示,原審就是否成立秘密要件之判斷有重大違誤,且原審忽略對蔡有利的證據,未敘明理由為何不採信。
另外,由於李宜諪的限制出境出海將於10月31日屆滿,法官接著開訊問庭,陳少璿表示,李宜諪始終坦承犯行,交保金高達70萬元,由家人籌措,應足以擔保不逃亡,且皆按時到庭,原審認為被告不足以幫助脫產、並未妨礙偵查,加上原判決所處之刑,不至於使一位執業律師從此逃亡海外,二審尚有證據要調查,無逃亡之動機。
檢察官則表示,有延長出境出海的必要。法官庭末諭知,全案將待合議庭評議後,再通知結果。
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
法院將對李宜諪是否延長限制出境出海做出裁定。
Very likely · Within days

On October 27, the Chengdu Intermediate People's Court issued a first-instance verdict on the bribery case of Wang Huimin, the former head of the China Securities Regulatory Commission's disciplinary inspection team. Wang Huimin was sentenced to death for accepting bribes, suspended for two years, deprived of political rights for life, confiscated of all personal property, commuted to life imprisonment, and imprisoned for life without the possibility of commutation or parole.

An Indian court ordered social media platforms to remove a documentary by Sabeer Bhatia accusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Gautam Adani of cronyism, following a defamation lawsuit by Adani Enterprises.

A former Deliveroo rider with severe brain injuries sued the platform in a Hong Kong court for compensation, demanding a full trial to determine his employment status despite the company's exit plans.

Three people including Lin Dewang, chairman of the Taiwan People's Communist Party, were charged with violating the Anti-Osmosis Law and the Medical Equipment Management Law. The High Court today rejected the prosecutor's appeal and upheld the acquittal verdict in the first instance. The High Court pointed out that the existing evidence could not prove the identity of the infiltration source and the source of funds, and the rapid screening could not be determined to be for bribery purposes. Prosecutors will consider whether to appeal.

On October 27, 2026, the Chengdu Intermediate People's Court publicly sentenced Wang Huimin, the former leader of the Discipline Inspection Team of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, for accepting bribes in the first instance. The defendant Wang Huimin was sentenced to death for accepting bribes, with a two-year suspended execution, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated all personal property. After the two-year suspended execution of his death penalty was commuted to life imprisonment in accordance with the law, he was sentenced to life imprisonment without commutation or parole.

Non-party legislator Gao Jin Sumei was charged with defrauding public assistant fees and illegally importing Chinese-made rapid screening reagents and was sentenced to 12 years in prison. The Taipei District Court held a preparatory court today for her first appearance in court. Members of his legal team, including former judge Zheng Yuren, former chief prosecutors Zhong Weihan and Li Yirong, appeared in court to plead not guilty.