While the governorship gave permission for an investigation to 4 people regarding the armed attack in Kahramanmaraş in which 10 people lost their lives, it did not give permission to 11 public officials; The chief prosecutor's office objected to the decision.
AI-generated summary
In the armed attack at Ayser Çalık Secondary School in Kahramanmaraş on April 15, a teacher and 9 students lost their lives and 15 students were injured.
Furkan Mehmet Cinkara, the lawyer of the students who lost their lives and were injured in the armed attack at Ayser Çalık Secondary School in Kahramanmaraş on April 15, in which teacher Ayla Kara and 9 students lost their lives and 15 students were injured, had filed a complaint against some public officials.
"NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS WERE NOT TAKEN"
According to the news in ANKA, in the complaint application, it was claimed that "some teachers and public officials working at the school abused their duties before the attack, did not take the necessary precautions to prevent the incident, neglected their obligations to notify the relevant authorities, and neglected their duties during the incident" and requested that these people also be prosecuted.
Kahramanraş Chief Public Prosecutor's Office also requested permission to investigate these people from the Kahramanmaraş Governorship.
11 NAMES WERE NOT GRANTED INVESTIGATION PERMISSION
Kahramanmaraş Governor Mükerrem Ünlüer's decision dated November 2 was added to the investigation file. In the decision, investigation permission was not given against 11 public officials, including former and current provincial and district national education administrators and school administrators. Governorship, former school principals M.B. and C.K., assistant director F.B. and guidance counselor E.İ. It ruled that an investigation permission be given against him within the scope of Law No. 4483.
"THE STUDENT'S SITUATION HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED TO NATIONAL EDUCATION BY PROVINCE"
In the Governorship's decision, the then Provincial Director of National Education Erhan Baydur, the Deputy Provincial Director of National Education H.A., and the Branch Director Y.S. regarding the allegation that Kahramanmaraş Provincial and Onikişubat District National Education Directorate officials did not take the necessary precautions to prevent the school attack. and former District Director of National Education Harun Kurt and Branch Managers A.K. and R.S.'s statements were included.
In the statements, it was stated that "Ayser Çalık Secondary School administrators or guidance counselors did not send any written or verbal notification or request to the provincial or district national education directorates about the student who carried out the attack, and that the attack was learned after it happened."
Kahramanmaraş Governor Mükerrem Ünlüer stated that "former school principal M.B. did not make any statement indicating that he reported the situation of the aggressive student to the Provincial and District Directorate of National Education."
In the Governorship's decision, the statements of former School Principal C.K., who said, "Since I did not receive any information about the aggressive student before the attack, I did not make a notification in this regard to the district or provincial directorate of national education. The teachers I met after the attack said that the aggressive student was introverted and that they never expected that he could make such an attack."
For these reasons, on the grounds that "no request was submitted to Kahramanmaraş Provincial Directorate of National Education and Onikişubat District Directorate of National Education before the attack", former Provincial Director of National Education E.B, Deputy Provincial Director of National Education H.A, Provincial Director of National Education Branch Y.S, former Onikişubat District Director of National Education H.K, branch managers A.K. and R.S. It was reported that it was decided "not to grant permission for investigation" against him.
"THIS PROBLEM BEHAVIOR WAS KNOWN"
The decision signed by Governor Ünlüer included the assessment that "The problematic behavior of the aggressive student İsa Aras Mersinli, who apparently had very serious problems and often slept during classes, was known to everyone, but instead of taking precautions, he was ignored." Guidance Teacher E.İ. is responsible for this situation. and it was emphasized that it belonged to former School Principal M.B.
In the Governorship's decision, Deputy Directors A.Y. and Ç.S. were dismissed on the grounds that they had no responsibilities. and Z.G. and other Guidance Teacher M.K. No permission was given to investigate him. On the grounds that the allegation against Social Studies Teacher I.H., who allegedly did not fulfill his duties during the attack, was not based on concrete information, it was decided not to grant permission for an investigation against this teacher.
THERE WAS NO RECORDING OF 32 GUIDANCE MEETINGS
In the investigation permission decision, it was noted that "there is no record about the attacker İsa Aras Mersinli in the school's E-Guidance module, and although 32 interviews were conducted by the guidance service, the explanations and archive records of these interviews were not kept."
In the decision, it was stated that "even though Mersinli's problematic behaviors were known, the necessary precautions were not taken, he was not referred to the guidance and research center, no document was requested from his family regarding his psychiatric treatment status, and no initiative was taken within the scope of the Child Protection Law". For these reasons, former School Principal M.B. and Guidance Teacher E.İ., before the attack, former School Principal C.K. and Deputy Director F.B. were considered to have neglected their duties during the incident, and it was concluded that an investigation permission should be given against them for "abuse of office".
Governor Ünlüer stated that an objection to the decision can be made to the Gaziantep Regional Administrative Court within 10 days from the date of notification.
THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OBJECTED
Kahramanmaraş Chief Public Prosecutor's Office objected to not granting permission for an investigation against 11 public officials regarding the Ayser Çalık Secondary School attack.
In the application made by the Chief Public Prosecutor's Office to the Gaziantep Regional Administrative Court, it was stated that "In the evaluation made by our Chief Public Prosecutor's Office, it is understood that the public officials in question were negligent and faulty in the incident that is the subject of the investigation, that the public officials in question did not take the necessary precautions and did not make the necessary notifications before the incident, and therefore, investigation procedures should be carried out against the public officials whose names are mentioned."
The Chief Public Prosecutor's Office requested that the Kahramanmaraş Governorship's decision not to grant an investigation permission be lifted and that an investigation permission be given against 11 public officials.
THOSE WHO WERE GIVEN INVESTIGATION PERMISSION
Former school principal Metin Bahşi, school principal at the time of the incident Cemal Kocabey, deputy principal Ferhat Bal and guidance counselor Ejder İnce.
THOSE WHO WERE NOT GRANTED INVESTIGATION PERMISSION
Provincial National Education Director Erhan Baydur, Provincial National Education Deputy Director Hasan Acaboğa, Provincial National Education Branch Director Yakup Saltalı, District National Education Director Harun Kurt, District National Education Branch Directors Ali Kaya and Ramazan Sertpolat, former school deputy principals Alpaslan Yıldırım, Çiğdem Seyrek and Zekeriye Gönen, guidance counselor Muammer Kayan and Social Studies Teacher İbrahim Huylu.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Gaziantep Regional Administrative Court will evaluate the chief prosecutor's objection against 11 public officials.
Very likely · Within weeks

Hakan Aysal, who was sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment for allegedly killing his pregnant wife Semra Aysal by pushing her from a cliff in Fethiye, was released upon the objection of the Supreme Court of Appeals Chief Public Prosecutor's Office and the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals Criminal General Assembly.

Hakan Aysal, who was sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment for allegedly killing his pregnant wife Semra Aysal by pushing her from a cliff in Fethiye in 2018, was released upon the objection of the Supreme Court of Appeals Chief Public Prosecutor's Office and the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals Criminal General Assembly.

In the case where 4 undetained defendants were tried for the accident that resulted in the death of 11 people and the injury of 62 people in the Sakarya section of the Northern Marmara Highway, the prosecutor's office requested imprisonment of up to 15 years for each of the defendants.
The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals approved the decision in which the employer was justified in dismissing the employee who worked for another employer without permission from the employer without compensation. The decision is dated 24 June 2026, Docket No: 2026/3315, Decision No: 2026/6247.

TCDD Operation General Directorate has made an announcement for the expropriation of the 414.73 m² real estate located on Gaziantep Province Nurdağı District Şatırhüyük District 125 Block 78 (new 126) Parcel and its registration in the title deed in the name of the Republic of Turkey State Railways. Those who claim rights must submit their defense and evidence to the court within 10 days from the date of announcement.

Ankara 23rd Civil Court of First Instance made a notification in the debt case filed by the General Directorate of Security against Bahadır Kazim Akçam. The receivable requested in the expert supplementary report was determined as 155,232.06 Dollars and 718.12 TL, and the liability of the guarantors was determined as 150,000.00 Dollars. The oral hearing will be held on 09/02/2027 at 09:35.