
OpenSecrets estimates total spending on this midterm election will reach $11.9 billion, setting a new record
AI-generated summary
The 2026 U.S. midterm elections will be held on the 3rd. OpenSecrets estimates that total expenditure will reach US$11.9 billion, setting a new record for the highest expenditure in a midterm election. Super PACs can accept uncapped contributions from individuals, businesses and unions, but can only make independent expenditures and cannot coordinate directly with candidate teams. After the U.S. Supreme Court’s “Citizens United” decision in 2010, the scale of expenditures by outside groups in elections expanded significantly.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has invested more than $445 million in political funds in the 2026 U.S. midterm elections, becoming the top personal political funder. (Reuters photo)
The U.S. midterm elections will take place on the 3rd. The non-profit organization OpenSecrets estimates that the total expenditure on the 2026 U.S. elections will reach 11.9 billion U.S. dollars (approximately NT$380 billion), setting a new record for the highest expenditure in midterm elections. Among them, Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s personal political donations have accumulated more than 445 million U.S. dollars (approximately NT$14.2 billion), setting the highest number of individual donors in the United States.
Relevant statistics point out that Musk’s huge funds mainly flow to support Republican candidates, Super Political Action Committees (Super PACs) and related peripheral groups, and not all of them are donated directly to individual candidates. In addition to traditional energy and real estate tycoons, the technology and cryptocurrency industries also demonstrated an astonishing silver bullet offensive in this election.
The Washington Post analyzed filings as of July 20, 2026, showing that well-known Silicon Valley venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz donated a total of approximately US$91.3 million, of which US$50 million went to Leading the Future, a super political action committee that supports the artificial intelligence (AI) industry. Future); in addition, the cryptocurrency trading platform Coinbase and the blockchain company Ripple also donated approximately US$57.1 million and US$49.6 million respectively, targeting political groups that support the friendly encryption industry.
An analysis released by the Brennan Center for Justice on October 27 pointed out that as of mid-October, the top 40 top donors in the current midterm elections had invested a total of more than $2.4 billion, setting a new high for the same period since the U.S. Supreme Court issued the Citizens United decision in 2010. Among them, the top 40 top donors who specifically support the Republican Party have invested a total of approximately $1.5 billion.
In accordance with U.S. Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulations, super PACs can accept unlimited donations from individuals, businesses and unions, but they can only make independent expenditures and cannot directly coordinate with candidate teams. OpenSecrets further estimates that the independent expenditures of various external groups in this election will total US$3.9 billion, a surge of about 85% compared with 2022, reflecting the rapid expansion of the influence of American money-power politics in the election.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Federal Election Commission or relevant regulatory agencies may conduct subsequent reviews of independent spending by super PACs
Possible · Within weeks
Regulatory policies related to cryptocurrency and AI industries may be adjusted after the election
Possible · Within months

Malaysia's unity government faces an uncomfortable test ahead of the Melaka state election on November 14, as governing parties revert to old rivalries and compete for votes.

Director of National Security Cai Mingyan will go to the Judiciary and Legal Affairs Committee of the Legislative Yuan on the 5th to give a special report on the issue of transnational repression in China. The latest written report of the National Security Bureau stated that it will focus on both individual cases and illegal networks, strengthen security maintenance deployment and investigation planning, protect victims and arrest premeditated perpetrators, and at the same time investigate the connections between gangs and credit-breaking businesses with China, and dismantle the CCP’s collaborative network in Taiwan.

Democratic Progressive Party spokesperson Lin Chu-yin questioned Taipei Mayor Chiang Wanan, who regarded Huida's establishment of science and technology in Taipei City as a political achievement, but forgot that when he was a legislator, he jumped on the table to boycott forward-looking infrastructure. She pointed out that projects such as the Huida AI R&D Center, the Jade Raw Water Pipeline, and the North and South Ring MRT were all supported by forward-looking funds. Jiang Wanan should not enjoy the results of the construction while avoiding his opposition.

Wang Zhiyuan, son of Wang Daohan and retired cadre of the deputy military region of the Communist Army, died of illness in Beijing on October 2 at the age of 85. Wang Zhiyuan served as deputy director of the Science and Technology Committee of the General Armament Department and was a representative of the 10th National People's Congress.

Legislator Gao Jin Sumei was interrogated as a defendant for about eight hours for the first time in a national security case. After the interrogation, he was asked to return without bail and was restricted from leaving the country. She denied being involved in violating the national security law, saying that because of her trust in Zhang Junjie, most of her staff's contacts with China and activity arrangements were left to him. Zhang Junjie has been involved in the case and absconded for the 59th day and has not yet arrived at the case. The two assistants have been detained and are not allowed to visit. The prosecutor will look at the evidence investigation and will not rule out notifying Gaojin again to arrive at the case.

Senior Japanese media person Akio Yaita criticized the first round of television debates in the Taipei mayoral election for placing too much emphasis on verbal attack and defense. Candidates relied on prepared speeches, making it difficult for voters to understand their governance concepts. He advocated that the format of the second debate should be changed to examine thinking methods and adaptability through questioning rather than a competition of slogans.