
AI-generated summary
After the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident, the Tsushima area suffered from severe pollution due to wind direction, and 98% of the area has become a difficult-to-return area. Residents continued to evacuate, and in 2015 about 600 people filed a Tsushima lawsuit against the government and TEPCO.
Doesn't the country, which was in the position of regulating nuclear power plants, bear legal responsibility for the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, which caused a core meltdown without being prepared for tsunamis and other severe accidents? On the 16th, the Sendai High Court will hand down an appeals court judgment in the ``Tsushima lawsuit'' in which this question was questioned. In 2022, the Supreme Court issued a ruling denying the state's responsibility, but the Tsushima lawsuit raises new issues, and it will be interesting to see whether this will lead to a review of the judicial decision.
What kind of lawsuit is it?
Approximately 600 people were involved, including residents of the Tsushima district of Namie Town, Fukushima Prefecture, where the entire town was forced to evacuate due to the accident. They are suing the national government and TEPCO for restoration of the area to its original condition to lower radiation levels and compensation for damages.
Tsushima is located approximately 30 kilometers northwest of the nuclear power plant, but due to the direction of the wind immediately after the accident, it suffered severe contamination, and even now, 98% of the island, excluding the area around the city office and branch, is uninhabitable and a difficult-to-return area. Residents continue to evacuate to surrounding municipalities, and nearly half of them became plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed in 2015.
After the nuclear power plant accident, including the Tsushima lawsuit...
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Sendai High Court may accept partial responsibility of state
Possible · Within days
![[Comprehensive understanding] Smartphone “remote analysis” bill Why is it being discussed now?](/api/img?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimgopt.asahi.com%2Fogp%2FAS20261016000190_comm.jpg&w=320&q=72&f=webp)
The National Police Agency has announced a policy to introduce ``remote analysis,'' a method of obtaining information by remotely intruding into criminals' smartphones, in order to prevent the spread of damage such as special fraud and robbery and murder by anonymous and mobile criminal groups. A bill to revise the Police Officer Duties Execution Act has been approved by the Cabinet and will be debated in the Diet. The amount of damage will reach an all-time high of approximately 325.7 billion yen in 2025, and the aim is to overcome the situation where it is difficult to identify the instructor through cooperation from telecommunications carriers and analysis of seized devices.

The Supreme Court announced on the 15th that a failure had occurred in the online filing system for civil trials, ``mints.'' We are calling for written submissions as an alternative method when the system is unavailable, and this is the first time that an alternative method due to a failure has been presented since the full digitalization in May.

The Supreme Court has decided to dismiss the appeal of former lawyer Yamato Eguchi's lawsuit seeking damages from the government after being subjected to derogatory remarks by a prosecutor during an interrogation. The order for compensation due to violation of personal rights was finalized, and the judgment of the twelfth instance, which found no violation of the right to remain silent, was upheld.

The Yokohama District Court has dismissed a lawsuit in which victims of investment fraud sought damages from both Meta's Japanese and American companies, alleging that they were harmed by false advertisements that used celebrities' facial photos. This is the first judgment in a similar lawsuit.

On the 15th, the Yokohama District Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim in a lawsuit in which victims of investment fraud sought a total of approximately 43 million yen in damages from Meta Inc. for allowing fake advertisements on social media to use photos of celebrities without their permission. This is the first judicial decision in a similar lawsuit nationwide.

The Osaka District Court decided on the 14th to hold the second trial on the 27th for defendant Kentaro Kitagawa, who was charged with semi-forced sexual intercourse for sexually assaulting a subordinate while he was a public prosecutor at the Osaka District Public Prosecutors Office. The defendant plans to maintain his innocence, and the verdict is scheduled to be handed down on March 12 next year.