Wu Zijia gave a lecture in Zhu County for the first time after being searched by the police. Xu Xinying presented flowers to cheer her up.

After being searched and interrogated by Hsinchu police last week, Wu Zijia, chairman of Formosa Electronic News, came to Hsinchu County for the first time tonight and continued to host his "Chairman's Fan Meeting" live online political commentary program at Hsinchu Zhubei Station. He targeted the Hsinchu prosecutor's search and seizure operations last week, criticizing them as "green terror" and "political atrocities." He asked the Hsinchu District Prosecutor's Office and the Ministry of Justice to give him an explanation. He also asked President Lai Ching-te, when news organizations are searched, how does the government ensure that news sources that have nothing to do with the incident will not be affected? to ensure press freedom in Taiwan. After the election, he will submit complete relevant information on this case to international press freedom organizations and international media to make a fair evaluation of his search and investigation.

KMT Hsinchu County Magistrate candidate Xu Xinying, who has long been supported by Wu Zijia through the "Chairman's Fan Meeting", arrived at the venue later. As soon as she took the stage, she presented flowers to greet Wu Zijia, and the two cheered each other up.

Wu Zijia said that on the morning of last Thursday and the 22nd, prosecutors from the Hsinchu District Prosecutor’s Office ordered agents to search his home and the Formosa Electronic Newspaper office and seize his mobile phone. The day before, they detained and banned a man named Peng from Hsinchu County who was entrusted by him to legally distribute newspapers.

He said that after being interviewed by the police that day, he was asked to return without even being re-interviewed by the prosecutor, posted on bail, or remanded in custody. But what he wants to question is that his seized mobile phone contains a large number of interview contact records, news investigation data, as well as undisclosed clues, sources and other information. Can the prosecutor freely inspect the information that has nothing to do with the case? This is a question of press freedom.

The prosecutor launched a search on suspicion of his involvement in the election strike law and for crimes under 5 years old. In fact, he could be found with just a summons. Did the actions of the prosecutor and the police comply with the principle of proportionality of the Constitution? He was also concerned about Peng Nan's rights. After all, he was fine as the "principal culprit" in the whole case. Why did the law prohibit the small businessman who worked for him from being detained? So he used "green terror" to express his strong concerns about Taiwan's current democracy.