
山东省高级人民法院通报服务保障农业农村现代化工作情况,发布典型案事例
山东省高级人民法院副院长傅国庆23日表示,2023年以来,全省法院依法审结涉农纠纷5.2万件,重点在耕地保护、种业知识产权、农村土地流转、海洋牧场及扫黑除恶等方面提供司法保障,推动农业农村现代化。
AI-generated summary
山东省法院系统持续推进农业农村现代化司法保障工作,涵盖耕地保护、知识产权及农村社会治理。
中新网济南9月23日电(周艺伟)山东省高级人民法院党组副书记、副院长傅国庆23日表示,山东法院精准对接农业农村现代化建设目标任务,着力促进农业高质高效、乡村宜居宜业、农民富裕富足,2023年以来,依法妥善审结各类涉农纠纷5.2万件。
当日,山东省高级人民法院召开新闻发布会,通报山东法院服务保障农业农村现代化工作情况,并发布典型案事例。
傅国庆介绍,山东法院严守耕地保护红线,依法打击非法占用农用地、非法采矿、土壤污染、破坏农业生产等违法犯罪行为。2023年以来,该省法院依法审结非法压占、非法挖损、非法采矿等破坏耕地资源违法犯罪案件928件,坚决遏制耕地“非农化”“非粮化”。
同时,山东法院加大对具有自主知识产权的重大农业科技成果和植物新品种的保护力度,2023年以来,新收植物新品种权案件665件,审结539件,6案入选人民法院种业知识产权司法保护典型案例。
傅国庆说,山东法院还加强农机装备科创成果司法保护,完善技术事实查明机制,在全国首创智能3D证据管理系统,对播种机、施肥机等大型农业设备进行扫描建模,有效破解专利侵权诉讼存证难题,助力现代农业机械装备和智慧农业发展。
“山东法院审慎审理涉农村土地经营权流转纠纷,服务土地规模化、集约化、现代化经营,2023年以来,依法审结涉农村土地承包、流转等案件1.7万件。”傅国庆举例称,在一起涉及1100余亩的土地租赁纠纷中,淄博市周村区人民法院采用“暂缓信用惩戒+宽限期”模式,积极引入合作企业,盘活土地与产业资源,在保留传统种植产业的同时,促成光伏发电产业落地,有效维护了农民合法权益。
傅国庆表示,2023年以来,山东法院依法审结涉新型渔业养殖、海洋牧场等案件2194件。在办理非法捕捞、海洋环境污染等案件中,该省法院探索将海洋碳汇损失纳入生态环境损害赔偿范围,引导违法行为人通过认购海洋碳汇、参与海洋生态修复等方式承担替代性修复责任。
在审理某公司海洋牧场平台建造合同纠纷案时,青岛海事法院发现海洋牧场缺乏验收规则和标准,及时向主管部门发送司法建议,协同山东省农业农村厅完善该省海洋牧场管理机制,为全国首部海上牧场地方性法规——《山东省海上牧场条例》的出台贡献了司法智慧。
“山东法院常态化开展农村地区扫黑除恶斗争,依法审结卜某勃等犯罪分子长期依托家族宗族把持基层政权、非法控制农村资源、严重破坏农村经济社会秩序的刑事案件。”傅国庆说,2023年以来,该省法院审结一审涉黑恶案件446件2436人,一批为害一方的“村霸”被绳之以法。
同时,山东法院依法规制农村地区高价彩礼,通过明确裁判规则,引导民众更加理性地看待彩礼问题,让彩礼归于“礼”。2023年以来,该省法院审结婚约财产纠纷案件1.3万件,推动形成健康、节俭、文明的婚嫁新风。

The Guangzhou Yuexiu District Court concluded a trademark infringement and unfair competition case. The defendant Guangzhou Youmou Clothing Co., Ltd. counterfeited the decoration of the "Jiao Nei" brand online store and used similar trademarks. The court found that it constituted infringement and ordered the defendant to pay compensation of 5 million yuan. The judgment was upheld by the second instance and has come into effect.

YouTuber Cheap was accused by Leihu Technology of insinuating that he was an arbitrage tool for specific shareholders and demanded NT$100 million for making a video discussing the operations of Lotte Group. After a trial, the Taipei District Court determined that Cheap had fulfilled its verification obligations and that the comments fell within the scope of freedom of speech. It ruled that Leihu Technology lost the case and Cheap was exempt from compensation. The entire case can be appealed.

A Changhua obstetrician and gynecologist named Zhuang was accused by a female patient of touching her private parts without wearing gloves during an ultrasound examination. The prosecutor charged him with taking advantage of medical opportunities for indecency. Both the first-instance and second-instance Taichung High Courts recognized that there was insufficient objective evidence and upheld the acquittal verdict. The entire case has not yet been determined.

In March 2022, the fire at Carrefour Yangmei Logistics Center was caused by a temporary worker named Xu who smoked in a no-smoking area and threw unextinguished cigarette butts, causing a loss of more than 3.9 billion yuan. After Fubon Property Insurance paid the compensation, the Taoyuan District Court ruled that Xu Nan and Zhongfaxing Logistics Company should jointly and severally compensate 870,783,155 yuan, and found that Xu Nan was guilty of public danger and that Zhongfaxing failed to fulfill its safety management responsibilities.
The Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security jointly issued the "Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Handling of Criminal Cases Involving Fentanyl Substances", which divide fentanyl substances into two categories: medicinal and non-medicinal, and refer to the quantitative standards of fentanyl and heroin respectively for conviction and sentencing, and refine the work responsibilities of the three organs of public security, procuratorate, and law, so as to severely punish crimes involving fentanyl substances in accordance with the law.
The Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security jointly issued the "Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Handling of Criminal Cases Involving Fentanyl Substances", which clarifies the standards for conviction and sentencing of fentanyl-type substance crimes, divides them into two categories: medicinal and non-medicinal, and stipulates the scope, evidence requirements, identification rules, etc., in order to strictly punish fentanyl-type substance crimes in accordance with the law and safeguard people's lives and health and social harmony and stability.