
The female patient alleged that she was inappropriately touched during an ultrasound examination. Both the first and second trials found that there was insufficient evidence and she was not guilty. The judge rarely left words of advice.
AI-generated summary
The female patient accused the obstetrician and gynecologist surnamed Zhuang of touching her private parts without wearing gloves during an ultrasound examination. The prosecutor charged her with taking advantage of medical opportunities for indecent assault.
An obstetrician and gynecologist surnamed Zhuang in Changhua was accused by a female patient of touching her private parts without gloves for more than 30 seconds while the nurse was turning around during an ultrasound examination. The prosecutor charged him with taking advantage of a medical opportunity for indecent assault. The first instance found that there was insufficient evidence and he was acquitted. After the case was appealed to the Taichung High Court, the appeal was recently rejected and the acquittal verdict was upheld. The whole case has not yet been determined.
Although the first-instance judge acquitted Zhuang Nan, he rarely left a "word of advice" at the end of the verdict, emphasizing that a good doctor-patient relationship is based on mutual trust and communication. Doctors should fully explain in advance when performing palpation, especially when they are not wearing gloves, and use empathy to reduce information asymmetry between doctors and patients to avoid medical misunderstandings due to insufficient communication. It is hoped that doctors can learn from this.
The case stemmed from a female patient who went to the obstetrics and gynecology department of a hospital in Changhua. She alleged that during an ultrasound examination, a doctor surnamed Zhuang touched her vulva for more than 30 seconds while the attending nurse turned around to operate the computer. The more she thought about it, the more she felt uncomfortable. After leaving the clinic, she reported it to the nurse and called the police. After the prosecutor investigated, Zhuang was charged.
During the trial at the Changhua District Court, Mr. Zhuang denied molestation. The nurse also testified that during the ultrasound preparatory operation, he asked the patient to remove his underwear above the pubic area and below the mons pubis, and clamp the top of the underwear with folded paper towels to avoid contamination with gel. The judge held that Because, if you want to directly touch the vulva, you have to put your hands into the covering area of the tissue and underwear. The patient was always lying flat at the time and was not asked to open his legs or change his posture. From an objective point of view, it is difficult for Mr. Zhuang to reach his private parts through the covering.
In addition, considering the small space in the clinic, the nurse was only about 3 or 4 steps away from the hospital bed at the time. If Zhuang Nan committed an obscene act in a situation where he could be witnessed at any time, it would be contrary to common sense and the verdict was acquitted. After the case was appealed to the Taichung Higher Branch, the collegial panel found that the original trial's admission of guilt was not illegal. The appeal was recently rejected and the verdict of Zhuang Nan's innocence was upheld. The whole case has not yet been determined.

Fu Guoqing, vice president of the Higher People's Court of Shandong Province, said on the 23rd that since 2023, courts across the province have concluded 52,000 agricultural-related disputes in accordance with the law, focusing on providing judicial protection in the protection of cultivated land, intellectual property rights in the seed industry, rural land transfer, marine pastures, and crackdowns on gangs and evil, and promote the modernization of agriculture and rural areas.

The Guangzhou Yuexiu District Court concluded a trademark infringement and unfair competition case. The defendant Guangzhou Youmou Clothing Co., Ltd. counterfeited the decoration of the "Jiao Nei" brand online store and used similar trademarks. The court found that it constituted infringement and ordered the defendant to pay compensation of 5 million yuan. The judgment was upheld by the second instance and has come into effect.

YouTuber Cheap was accused by Leihu Technology of insinuating that he was an arbitrage tool for specific shareholders and demanded NT$100 million for making a video discussing the operations of Lotte Group. After a trial, the Taipei District Court determined that Cheap had fulfilled its verification obligations and that the comments fell within the scope of freedom of speech. It ruled that Leihu Technology lost the case and Cheap was exempt from compensation. The entire case can be appealed.

In March 2022, the fire at Carrefour Yangmei Logistics Center was caused by a temporary worker named Xu who smoked in a no-smoking area and threw unextinguished cigarette butts, causing a loss of more than 3.9 billion yuan. After Fubon Property Insurance paid the compensation, the Taoyuan District Court ruled that Xu Nan and Zhongfaxing Logistics Company should jointly and severally compensate 870,783,155 yuan, and found that Xu Nan was guilty of public danger and that Zhongfaxing failed to fulfill its safety management responsibilities.
The Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security jointly issued the "Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Handling of Criminal Cases Involving Fentanyl Substances", which divide fentanyl substances into two categories: medicinal and non-medicinal, and refer to the quantitative standards of fentanyl and heroin respectively for conviction and sentencing, and refine the work responsibilities of the three organs of public security, procuratorate, and law, so as to severely punish crimes involving fentanyl substances in accordance with the law.
The Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security jointly issued the "Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Handling of Criminal Cases Involving Fentanyl Substances", which clarifies the standards for conviction and sentencing of fentanyl-type substance crimes, divides them into two categories: medicinal and non-medicinal, and stipulates the scope, evidence requirements, identification rules, etc., in order to strictly punish fentanyl-type substance crimes in accordance with the law and safeguard people's lives and health and social harmony and stability.