Debunking rumors that "a fire broke out in a logistics warehouse in Zhuzhou, Hunan" is a rumor
Details: Recently, a post about "a fire broke out in a logistics furniture warehouse in Zhuzhou, Hunan Province" was circulated on the Internet, saying that "the scene was filled with flames and billowing black smoke rising straight into the sky. It was clearly visible from several kilometers away. The picture was shocking. A large number of furniture and other flammable items were piled up in the warehouse. "The fire spread very quickly, and the steel frame structure can easily collapse under high temperatures, making rescue more difficult." The local fire department has verified that there have been no similar fires in Zhuzhou City recently.
Popular science: "If you open the windows on the high-speed train, the airflow will suck people out" is not true
Details: The windows on high-speed trains are completely closed and cannot be opened, and there is no ventilation structure in traditional trains. In this regard, there are rumors that "when taking a high-speed train with the windows open, people will be sucked out directly by the airflow." There is no scientific basis for this statement. The reason why many people believe this is because they confuse high-speed rail and airplanes. When an airplane flies at a high altitude, the outside air pressure is low, and the air pressure inside the cabin needs to be maintained close to the ground to allow passengers to breathe normally. Therefore, a significant pressure difference is formed inside and outside the airplane. However, high-speed trains operate in a ground environment, and the air pressure inside and outside the carriage is similar. There is no huge pressure difference during airplane flight. Even if the windows accidentally open while the high-speed train is running, there will not be a huge pressure difference that will "suck people out." The reason why high-speed trains do not open windows is based on multiple considerations such as air pressure stability, aerodynamic stability, safety protection, noise control and energy consumption reduction, so as to further improve passenger comfort.
Notice: Weifang, Shandong Province announced 6 typical cases of cracking down on online rumors and online violence
Details: Recently, Weifang, Shandong Province announced 6 typical cases of cracking down on online rumors and online violence. The report is as follows.
Case 1: Netizens fabricated facts and lied to the police. In September 2026, a netizen named Dou had a quarrel with others. In order to vent his personal anger, he fabricated facts and published a work related to "Some people gathered to gamble in a certain place in Linqu County" on a short video platform, falsely reporting the situation, attracting the attention of netizens and disrupting normal police order.
Case 2: Netizens set up a live broadcast to fabricate online rumors about enterprises. In October 2025, netizen Liu had a conflict with a hotel over the rental fee. In order to demand high compensation, he and many people set up live broadcasts on a short video platform many times, fabricated and released false information, deliberately exaggerated confrontation, incited emotions, attracted the attention of netizens, disrupted social and public order, and had a negative impact on the hotel's normal operations and reputation.
Case 3: A case in which netizens fabricated online rumors involving gangs. In June 2026, netizen Cao had a conflict with Li. In order to vent his emotions and gain attention, he posted a video of Li's family on a short video platform, and commented on "Anqiu Yiba" and other false information, which aroused the attention of netizens and disrupted social and public order.
Case 4: A case in which netizens posted insulting remarks and committed cyber violence. In September 2026, netizen Zhao Moumou had a conflict with the village cadre Feng Moumou, and his emotions intensified after drinking. He insulted him in the village WeChat group, maliciously attacked others, and committed online violence, causing negative social impact.
Case 5: Netizens made up false information about "touching porcelain" to commit insult. In September 2026, netizen Ren Mou had a quarrel with someone. In order to vent his emotions, he posted content on a short video platform such as "It's like a mourning hall, the girl who touched the porcelain was lying inside." He fabricated false information such as "the victim was frightened and asked for compensation, and the porcelain was done maliciously." He maliciously insulted and slandered, attracted the attention of netizens, and disrupted social and public order.
Case 6: Netizens used negative information about enterprises to carry out extortion cases. In September 2026, in order to seek illegal benefits and seize special moments such as the release of new industry regulations, netizen Wang frequently published negative articles on a number of Internet technology companies on a self-media platform, deliberately creating pressure from public opinion and forcing relevant companies to proactively negotiate and pay so-called "cooperation fees." This was used to carry out extortion, adversely affecting the normal operations and reputation of relevant companies, and disrupting social and public order.
At present, the local public security organs have imposed administrative detention, administrative penalties, and criminal coercive measures on the above-mentioned relevant personnel.
