
Emily Normandin-Parker, 23, was killed in a head-on collision with an Uber driver on a highway in California.
Uber has been ordered to pay $40 million (Rs 380 crore) compensation to the family of 23-year-old Emily Normandin-Parker, who was killed after she was flagged down by an Uber driver on a California highway.
AI-generated summary
Emily Normandin-Parker was killed after being struck by a driver during an Uber ride on a California highway.
Uber has been ordered to pay compensation of $40 million (Rs 380 crore) to the family of a 23-year-old woman.
The woman died on a highway in California. It is alleged that the Uber driver stopped the car and asked him to get out of the car.
According to court documents, Emily Normandin-Parker booked an Uber to go home with a friend on August 12, 2023. On the way, her friend fell ill and vomited in the car.
Emily's parents told that the driver stopped the car on the side of the highway. He alleged that the driver forcibly threw both the women out of the car. After this, another car hit Emily on the same highway, due to which she died.
Uber had argued that the driver was not an employee of the company, but an independent contractor. Therefore the company was not responsible for his work.
Emily's parents said in a statement, "Emily followed all of the instructions given to passengers by Uber. She made the responsible decision not to drive and booked a vehicle. We had confidence that Uber would get her home safely. Our daughter had to pay the price of this trust with her life."
Emily was a graduate from the University of California, Los Angeles.
According to Panish, Shea, Ravipudi, the law firm fighting the case on behalf of the family, Judge Richard Stone ordered Uber to compensate Emily's parents after a five-day mediation.
Mediation is a way to resolve a dispute outside of court. In this the help of a qualified mediator is taken. The arbitrator in this case was a retired judge.
The family's lawyers said driver Vu Tran did not seek help for the women after dropping them off on the highway. Instead, he pulled over and called Uber and demanded Emily be charged for the cleaning.
"Tran cared more about his new car than his passengers," Judge Stone said. He said Tran could have exited the highway and dropped the women at a safe place.
Uber said it believes the arbitrator made a mistake by holding the company legally responsible for the incident.
"We have continually improved our safety practices through new technology, policies and safety measures based on input from safety experts, including providing drivers with additional information about how to avoid dropping off passengers at unsafe locations," the company said in a statement.
The law firm fighting the case on behalf of the family said that Uber had initially proposed a settlement of 10 million dollars (Rs 95 crore). Under this, Emily's parents would be given money, but they would have to agree to the condition of not talking about this incident. The family rejected this proposal.
India's Supreme Court held that personal liberty under Article 21 cannot be invaded except according to constitutionally established procedure, even for serious crimes, emphasizing that arrest grounds must be communicated in writing and in a language understandable to the accused, and re-arrest after illegal detention requires senior police approval and court nod.
The Supreme Court of India criticized the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and its appellate and appellate NCLAT for operating from dilapidated buildings with leaking roofs, poor infrastructure, and severe vacancies in members and support staff, stating the situation is unacceptable given their role in handling Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cases involving thousands of crores of rupees.
The Supreme Court ruled that crime investigation falls exclusively under police jurisdiction and courts cannot interfere with probe timelines, quashing a Bombay High Court decision that had denied an extension to file a chargesheet against a PFI member, leading to default bail. The court directed the accused to surrender within 30 days after setting aside the bail order.
Satish Salian, father of the late Disha Salian, has served a legal notice to Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aaditya Thackeray, demanding a public apology and Rs 500 crore in damages, citing defamation and alleged threats against his legal counsel.
Sikh Spiritual Centre Toronto and Nanaksar Thath Ishar Darbar face a lawsuit over $13 million in loans arranged by former MP Rajvinder Grewal's law firm. Lenders allege improper security registration, adding to over $200 million in civil claims against the firm.
A US appeals court has ruled that border agents may conduct manual searches of travelers' cellphones without a warrant. The decision, stemming from a case at JFK Airport, affirms that the border-search exception applies to digital devices despite First Amendment concerns.