
Ms. Zhang owed 39 amounts of money including license tax, fuel fees, compulsory insurance fines, and health insurance fees, which were seized near the Wuri High-speed Railway Station through the mobile license plate recognition system.
AI-generated summary
The Administrative and Enforcement Department has launched a "traffic project" since May 1 this year. The Taichung Branch Office cooperates with the Taichung City Local Taxation Bureau across agencies to use a mobile license plate recognition system to scan license plates, compare delinquent vehicle information, and conduct enforcement actions such as seizure and towing of delinquent vehicles.
The Taichung branch seized the tow truck, so Ms. Zhang urgently raised money to pay off the debt in full and get the vehicle back. (Provided by Taichung Branch)
A 51-year-old woman surnamed Zhang in Taichung City owed 39 payments including vehicle license tax, fuel fees, compulsory insurance fines and health insurance premiums, totaling more than 167,000 yuan. A LEXUS SUV under her name was fined by the Administrative and Enforcement Department The Taichung branch locked down and tracked the whereabouts of the vehicle through the "Mobile License Plate Recognition System", and finally caught the tax-delinquent vehicle near the Wuri High-Speed Railway Station. When Zhang learned that her car had been seized and towed, she hurriedly raised money and paid in full within 3 days before successfully getting it back.
After investigation, Zhang’s outstanding debts include unpaid vehicle license taxes and related fines from 2021, automobile fuel usage fees (now renamed highway maintenance fees), uninsured compulsory automobile liability insurance fines, and National Health Insurance premiums since January last year. The total amount is as high as 39, with a total amount of more than 167,000 yuan. Although various agencies have repeatedly notified Zhang to pay, Zhang has always ignored it, and the cases have been transferred to the Taichung branch for enforcement since March this year.
The Taichung branch first notified Ms. Zhang to pay within a time limit, but she still received no response. The enforcement officers further investigated the property and found that she had an imported Lexus white luxury SUV manufactured in 2021 under her name, which was immediately included in the investigation target. This coincided with the Administrative and Enforcement Department launching the "Transportation Project" on May 1 this year. The Taichung Branch Office collaborated with the Taichung City Local Taxation Bureau across agencies to use a mobile license plate recognition system to scan the license plate through technological equipment and compare the vehicle information with arrears. It was found that the SUV appeared in a roadside parking space near the Wuri High Speed Rail Station. Officers were immediately sent to the scene to confirm the vehicle registration, and it was seized and towed for safekeeping in accordance with the law.
When Ms. Zhang was informed that the situation was serious, she quickly raised funds and paid off all the debt within three days before successfully getting her car back. The Taichung Branch Office stated that if people receive a reminder notice, they must not ignore it, otherwise their property may be seized, detained or even auctioned. In serious cases, they may face enforcement measures such as restrictions on leaving the country or even arrest and collection.

Jiangsu Hongwei Technology Co., Ltd. is suspected of engaging in business activities in Taiwan without permission through Yaoxun International Company established by Feng Yaoxian and his wife. After the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office concluded its investigation, it prosecuted the Feng couple in accordance with the "Ordinance on Relations between People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area" and requested a fine from Yaoxun Company.

Jingjing Media sued People’s Party Chairman Huang Guochang for defamation when he insinuated at a press conference that he instigated gangsters to intimidate reporter Chen Yanheng’s father. Huang Guochang denied committing the crime and accused the other party of criminal abuse. The Taipei District Court concluded the trial today and found Huang Guochang not guilty.
Relying on the "Interim Provisions on the Protection of Basic Rights and Interests of Over-Aged Workers", the Suzhou Intermediate People's Court finally supported the request of a 53-year-old retired female worker Cai for work-related injury benefits, and adjusted the cause of the case to "employment disputes for over-aged workers", breaking the dilemma that over-age workers need to first confirm the labor relationship to defend their work-related injury rights. Experts recommended improving supporting details and expanding the scope of protection coverage.
When delivery rider Wang Liang was hospitalized, a salesperson from a law firm came to his door and promised to help him settle the claim. After signing the contract, the law firm did not actively advance the claim. The rider settled the claim on his own and was compensated, but the law firm sued for 10,000 yuan in liquidated damages. The court found that one of the contracts was invalid and that although the other contract was valid, the law firm was at fault and rejected the claim for liquidated damages. Lawyers caution that such agreements often contain unreasonable terms.

An entrepreneur surnamed Chen undertook a renovation project for a camp at a joint training base between the three armed forces. Worker Wang Nan fell from a scaffolding and was seriously injured. The Pingtung District Court found that the two parties had an employment relationship and that Chen was at fault, and awarded him 510,306 yuan in compensation. He can appeal.

The Taichung District Court ruled that the Taichung City Government's Labor Department should compensate his parents NT$3,546,795 in the case of a 16-year-old boy who fell to his death while riding a motorcycle due to uneven roads. The court found that the road maintenance was negligent, but the teenager was speeding and was under the age to pass the test, so he must bear 30% of the responsibility. The decision remains subject to appeal.