
AI-generated summary
An entrepreneur named Chen undertook the renovation project of the camp at the joint training base of the three armed forces. Through Zheng Nan, he hired Wang Nan to do the construction. Wang Nan fell from a high scaffolding on the first floor and suffered serious injuries to his cervical spine and head. He was unable to work for 6 months.
An entrepreneur surnamed Chen undertook a renovation project related to the camp at the joint training base of the three armed forces. When a worker fell and was injured, Chen was awarded compensation for failing to take safety precautions. (File photo)
An entrepreneur surnamed Chen undertook a renovation project related to the camp at the joint training base of the three armed forces. During the work of drilling and burying pipes, a worker surnamed Wang fell from a scaffolding and was seriously injured. Wang Nan believed that the employee surnamed Chen failed to take safety precautions and violated the provisions of the Occupational Safety Law, so he filed a lawsuit for compensation of nearly one million yuan. Chen Nan emphasized that he and Wang Nan had no employment relationship, and Wang Nan's compensation was unfounded. The Pingtung District Court found that the two parties had an employment relationship, and the employer surnamed Chen was negligent and should compensate Wang Nan for more than 510,000 yuan. He can appeal.
Wang Nan claimed that he was hired by an employer named Chen more than three years ago to carry out camp-related renovation projects at a salary of 2,800 yuan per day. While digging walls and burying pipes, he fell from a scaffolding on the first floor, causing severe injuries to his cervical spine and head. He was unable to work for six months. The employer surnamed Chen did not provide ropes or other appropriate anti-fall safety equipment at the construction site, which violated the relevant provisions of the Occupational Safety Law. He should be compensated for work losses, nursing fees and mental comfort payments totaling more than 970,000 yuan.
The owner surnamed Chen claimed that he asked the person surnamed Zheng in the engineering industry to help call workers for construction. Wang Nan was the worker hired by Zheng Nan and had no employment relationship with him. A safety coaching meeting was held before the construction. He told the foreman and workers to wear safety helmets, and safety vests were also provided on site.
The Pingtung District Court pointed out that according to what Liang Zao and Zheng Nan said, Chen Nan approached Wang Nan through Zheng Nan to do the construction work for him. Wang Nan worked according to Chen Nan's instructions. Chen Nan then paid daily wages to Wang Nan through Zheng Nan. Zheng Nan served as the communication agency between the two institutions, so the two institutions should have been established. According to the employment contract, there was no safety net or safety belts or ropes provided at the construction site, and safety measures were insufficient. As the employer, Chen Nan should bear the liability for negligence, and Wang Nan also had to bear part of the negligence liability. According to the entire case, Chen Nan should pay Wang Nan 510,306 yuan.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Chen Nan may appeal against the verdict
Possible · Within weeks

Jiangsu Hongwei Technology Co., Ltd. is suspected of engaging in business activities in Taiwan without permission through Yaoxun International Company established by Feng Yaoxian and his wife. After the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office concluded its investigation, it prosecuted the Feng couple in accordance with the "Ordinance on Relations between People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area" and requested a fine from Yaoxun Company.

Jingjing Media sued People’s Party Chairman Huang Guochang for defamation when he insinuated at a press conference that he instigated gangsters to intimidate reporter Chen Yanheng’s father. Huang Guochang denied committing the crime and accused the other party of criminal abuse. The Taipei District Court concluded the trial today and found Huang Guochang not guilty.
Relying on the "Interim Provisions on the Protection of Basic Rights and Interests of Over-Aged Workers", the Suzhou Intermediate People's Court finally supported the request of a 53-year-old retired female worker Cai for work-related injury benefits, and adjusted the cause of the case to "employment disputes for over-aged workers", breaking the dilemma that over-age workers need to first confirm the labor relationship to defend their work-related injury rights. Experts recommended improving supporting details and expanding the scope of protection coverage.
When delivery rider Wang Liang was hospitalized, a salesperson from a law firm came to his door and promised to help him settle the claim. After signing the contract, the law firm did not actively advance the claim. The rider settled the claim on his own and was compensated, but the law firm sued for 10,000 yuan in liquidated damages. The court found that one of the contracts was invalid and that although the other contract was valid, the law firm was at fault and rejected the claim for liquidated damages. Lawyers caution that such agreements often contain unreasonable terms.

The Taichung District Court ruled that the Taichung City Government's Labor Department should compensate his parents NT$3,546,795 in the case of a 16-year-old boy who fell to his death while riding a motorcycle due to uneven roads. The court found that the road maintenance was negligent, but the teenager was speeding and was under the age to pass the test, so he must bear 30% of the responsibility. The decision remains subject to appeal.
On November 12, Guangdong held a meeting to promote the construction of the "Guangdong Legal Protection" care and assistance system, and released a special fund, expert database and IP image "Fa Xiaoshi", aiming to provide financial, professional and legal support to minors in trouble involved in litigation through cross-departmental collaboration, and promote the standardization of the assistance mechanism.