
AI-generated summary
While applications for rehabilitation and bankruptcy are increasing due to the recession, including high inflation and high interest rates, regional disparities have emerged in the processing time of cases in each court.
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Lee Bal-eum = While applications for rehabilitation and bankruptcy continue due to the recession, including high inflation and high interest rates, it was found that there was a large gap between regions in the case processing period by court.
According to data submitted by the Court Administration of the Supreme Court to the office of Rep. Seo Young-kyo of the Democratic Party of Korea on the 4th, the time taken from January to June of this year from the receipt of rehabilitation and bankruptcy cases to the decision to open and sentence in courts across the country varied by up to 4.6 times by region.
For personal rehabilitation, Chuncheon District Court took the shortest time from application to commencement decision at 2.9 months, followed by Suwon Rehabilitation Court at 4 months, Incheon District Court at 4.5 months, and Seoul Rehabilitation Court at 4.9 months.
On the other hand, Daegu Rehabilitation Court lasted 12 months, and Uijeongbu District Court lasted 13.2 months, exceeding one year, which was 4.6 times longer than Chuncheon District Court.
It is twice the national average (6.4 months).
Unlike the average processing period for other bankruptcy and rehabilitation procedures, which was shorter than before, the average processing period for personal rehabilitation increased from 5.8 months in 2024 to 6.4 months for both last year and the first half of this year.
For personal bankruptcy in the first half of this year, the Busan Bankruptcy Court took the shortest time from filing to sentencing at 1.8 months, while the Seoul Bankruptcy Court took 2.2 months.
On the other hand, Daejeon Rehabilitation Court took the longest at 5.1 months, which was about 2.8 times longer than Busan Rehabilitation Court.
The average personal bankruptcy processing period was shortened by more than one month from 4.4 months in 2023 to 3.1 months in the first half of this year.
Regional differences were also confirmed in corporate rehabilitation and corporate bankruptcy.
For corporate rehabilitation, the Suwon Rehabilitation Court took an average of 0.9 months and the Seoul Rehabilitation Court took 1.1 months to make a decision to commence, while the Jeju District Court took 3.7 months, about 4.1 times longer than the Suwon Rehabilitation Court.
For corporate bankruptcy, the Suwon Bankruptcy Court and the Daejeon Bankruptcy Court each took 1 month to pronounce, the Seoul Bankruptcy Court took 1.2 months, and the Jeju County Court took 4 months, a four-fold difference.
Rep. Seo Young-kyo said, “No matter where they live, debtors should be guaranteed the opportunity to quickly recover,” and added, “The National Court Administration must prepare specific improvement measures for courts with severe delays.”
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The National Court Administration will prepare specific improvement measures for courts with severe delays.
Likely · Within months

The Busan District Court decided to substitute mediation for the Busan Port Authority and the business operator, who are in a legal dispute over the '3.3m level gap' of the pedestrian deck of the Busan Port North Port Complex Transfer Center.

The Cheongju District Court ruled that the parents of A, a middle school student who forcibly molested and sexually harassed a female student in his class for several months, must compensate the victim about 18 million won.

The Seoul Administrative Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim, ruling that Gangdong-gu Office's decision to publish the list of daycare centers A, which illegally received 100 million won in subsidies and falsely registered children and child care teachers, was lawful. The court ruled that oral notice was legal because prior notice during the investigation could lead to destruction of evidence.

The Serious Crimes Investigation Office, which celebrated its first holiday immediately after its launch, sent some executives and employees to work, reorganized administrative procedures, and began preparations for a full-scale investigation. With the capacity starting at 66%, attention is focused on the transfer of the case to the Public Prosecution Office and the conclusion of the 'No. 1 investigation'.

In a lawsuit filed by Mr. A, who applied for payment of inheritance tax, against the head of the Seocho Tax Office, the Seoul Administrative Court ruled that the plaintiff lost the case, ruling that the tax authority's refusal that Company B's unlisted stocks were unsuitable for management and disposal due to a deficit that continued for two years was legal.

The Supreme Court ruled that it cannot be concluded that the debtor re-applied for an unfair purpose based solely on the experience of having several personal rehabilitation applications rejected or abolished in the past. It was stated that when reapplying, the circumstances of the past decision, the status of the creditor's claim recovery, and changes in the debtor's assets must be comprehensively reviewed.