Breaking
AUCoach Aloisi oversees stunning capitulation in Chinese Super League title raceAUMan in waiting room dies after car crashes into medical centreITNvidia, Huang admits the relationship with the Chinese spy: "I was unfaithful". But he doesn't resignCNZhejiang Provincial College “Three Major Football” Campus Super League kicks off in Hangzhou, ZhejiangCNFree Lectures" Gao Jin Sumei accepts financial aid from the CCP. What kind of "friendly exchange" is considered?SAWirtz breaks league duck as Liverpool beat Palace 3–1 to climb into top fourCNJen-Hsun Huang cheated on me! The spy mistress' "crazy background" was exposed and the inside story of their acquaintance was revealedCNWTT Frankfurt Championship: Tomokazu Harimoto and Hina Hayata reach the topFRThe boss of the MMA spokesperson for the White House? Trump says it was a 'joke'DEKrakow after the crime - the status of the investigationAUCoach Aloisi oversees stunning capitulation in Chinese Super League title raceAUMan in waiting room dies after car crashes into medical centreITNvidia, Huang admits the relationship with the Chinese spy: "I was unfaithful". But he doesn't resignCNZhejiang Provincial College “Three Major Football” Campus Super League kicks off in Hangzhou, ZhejiangCNFree Lectures" Gao Jin Sumei accepts financial aid from the CCP. What kind of "friendly exchange" is considered?SAWirtz breaks league duck as Liverpool beat Palace 3–1 to climb into top fourCNJen-Hsun Huang cheated on me! The spy mistress' "crazy background" was exposed and the inside story of their acquaintance was revealedCNWTT Frankfurt Championship: Tomokazu Harimoto and Hina Hayata reach the topFRThe boss of the MMA spokesperson for the White House? Trump says it was a 'joke'DEKrakow after the crime - the status of the investigation
BackThe inmate was accused of being improperly suppressed in the fourth degree and injured while being shackled. Judge: South Prison must pay state compensation.
The inmate was accused of being improperly suppressed in the fourth degree and injured while being shackled. Judge: South Prison must pay state compensation.
NEWS
自由时报21 minutes agoLaw3 min readChinaView original

The inmate was accused of being improperly suppressed in the fourth degree and injured while being shackled. Judge: South Prison must pay state compensation.

The judge found that the prison's control exceeded the principle of proportionality and ordered Nanjian to compensate Wu Nan for his medical expenses and emotional comfort.

Quick Look

  • A nearly 60-year-old inmate named Wu in Tainan Prison was improperly suppressed four times by the administrator on April 29, 2024 and forcibly handcuffed and shackled, causing multiple abrasions and contusions.
  • He sued the state for compensation.
  • After reviewing the surveillance images, the Tainan District Court determined that the prison's control exceeded the principle of proportionality and ordered the Southern Prison to compensate Wu Nan for a total of NT$31,550 in medical expenses and emotional comfort.

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

On April 29, 2024, while Wu was marching in front of the health department building of Tainan Prison, he was improperly suppressed by the administrator four times and forcibly handcuffed and shackled, causing dizziness, abrasions and contusions on his back, knees, and ankles. The prison authorities maintained that Wu Nan disrupted order and refused to obey discipline, and that the administrator did not act beyond what was necessary; the prosecutor decided not to prosecute the administrator. After reviewing the surveillance images and medical records, the judge determined that the prison's control exceeded the principle of proportionality and ordered Nanjing State to pay NT$31,550 in compensation.

Font size

A male inmate named Wu in Tainan Prison complained that at the end of April 2024, he was suppressed by prison administrators four times with improper force and was handcuffed and shackled, causing multiple injuries to his body. He filed a lawsuit against the state for compensation. The prison authorities accused Wu Nan of disrupting order first, disobeying discipline, and insulting and provoking the administrator. The administrator did not suppress or restrict Wu beyond what was necessary, nor did he intentionally harm Wu Nan. However, the Tainan District Court reviewed the prison surveillance video and determined that the prison's control exceeded the principle of proportionality, and ordered the Tainan Prison to pay more than 31,000 yuan in state compensation to Wu Nan.

Wu Nan, who is nearly 60 years old, claimed that on the morning of April 29, 2024, he was improperly suppressed to the ground and handcuffed by the administrator while the team was marching in front of the Health Department Building of the South Prison. He was also improperly shackled and was not provided with protective sheaths. He walked barefoot on the asphalt road to the dormitory; the administrator returned the shackles. They roared at him and beat him on the head and back, causing him to feel dizzy and bruised his back, knees, and ankles. He was inappropriately suppressed four times in the front and back, exceeding the necessary level and violating the principle of proportionality. It was actually punishment in the name of restraint equipment and violated his right to body and health. For this reason, he filed a state compensation lawsuit.

The South Prison stated that it was Wu Nan who had inappropriate words and deeds towards the administrator. When other administrators saw that Wu had a bad attitude and threatened to abuse the administrator, they suppressed Wu on the ground and handcuffed him. After that, Wu refused to cooperate and went to the central stage to be shackled, struggled and insulted the administrator. In order to prevent other inmates from being agitated, they suppressed Wu Nan again, put a wooden baton on Wu's arm, and took him to the central stage.

After Wu arrived at the Central Station, his attitude was still arrogant and emotionally unstable. In order to prevent Wu from being violently attacked, the administrator restrained and shackled him. During the process, he did not beat or kick him. The law enforcement actions were legal and did not exceed the necessary level. Moreover, the prosecutor also issued a non-prosecution against the administrator of the South Prison, so he should not be liable for state compensation.

The judge examined the monitors and camera images in the South Prison and the screenshots of the videos submitted by Wu Nan. Because some of the monitors did not have a recording function, there was no way to know that Wu Nan’s words and deeds were bad at the time. In addition, the monitor was far away from Wu Nan and others, and it was impossible to determine that Wu was emotionally agitated, swearing, struggling and uncooperative. It was difficult to recognize that the Nan Prison claimed that Wu Nan had reached the level of disrupting order and needed to be separated with a wooden baton.

The judge also learned from the CCTV monitor that the administrator had shackled Wu and said to Wu Xie, "Open your shackles. Let me hear the sound and you will die. Go away." At that time, Wu Nan was not seen abusing the administrator, but the administrator still said, "What are you doing, brutality supervisor, suppress, suppress." The administrator suppressed Wu Nan, who was handcuffed and shackled, to the ground for the fourth time.

The judge said that the hospital's medical records on that day showed that Wu's injuries were caused by the administrator's handling; the Department of Correction's review and the Supervisory Office also said the same, which showed that the administrator's control of Wu exceeded the necessary level. Nanjing Prison should bear the state compensation liability for Wu's injuries, including medical expenses and emotional comfort. A total of 31,550 yuan should be compensated. The case can be appealed.

What to Watch

AI outlook — possibilities, not facts

  • Wu Nan or the prison authorities appealed against the first-instance verdict

    Likely · Within weeks

Open Questions

  • Will Wu Nan appeal this verdict?
  • Will prison administrators be subject to internal administrative sanctions?
  • The specific extent of Wu Nan’s injuries and treatment details

Related Topics

This article was originally published by 自由时报.

Related Stories

Jin Guanping: Govern low-price and disorderly competition in accordance with laws and regulations
Developing·

Jin Guanping: Govern low-price and disorderly competition in accordance with laws and regulations

The State Council executive meeting passed in principle the Price Law of the People's Republic of China (Draft Amendment), proposing to control low-price and disorderly competition in accordance with laws and regulations. The article elaborates on the core significance of governing low-price and disorderly competition, the effectiveness of governance in recent years, the main contents of the revised draft, and the requirements for supporting rules and platform economic supervision, aiming to guide the market from "fighting for low prices" to "fighting for value, innovation, and services."

中国新闻网
4 min read
More than 1 billion pieces of personal information were illegally stolen, and those who "opened the box" were severely punished for multiple crimes.
Law·

More than 1 billion pieces of personal information were illegally stolen, and those who "opened the box" were severely punished for multiple crimes.

The Supreme People's Procuratorate released a typical case in which many game players were "unboxed" online and were raped online. The Chengdu Procuratorate cooperated with the public security organs to investigate the case, and six defendants were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment for the crimes of infringing on citizens' personal information, picking quarrels and provoking trouble.

中国新闻网
8 min read
Wife secretly took screenshots of her husband’s cellphone conversations to catch him raping her, but was charged with obstructing secrets and sentenced to 40 days in custody
Law·

Wife secretly took screenshots of her husband’s cellphone conversations to catch him raping her, but was charged with obstructing secrets and sentenced to 40 days in custody

A woman surnamed Wu suspected that her husband surnamed Liu was having an affair with a woman surnamed Shen. She secretly took 93 screenshots of their LINE and Instagram conversations while her husband was sleeping, and used this to tell Shen that she was violating her spousal rights. The Keelung District Court sentenced Wu to 40 days of detention and fined her 40,000 yuan, finding that the right to privacy is higher than the right to spouse.

自由时报
2 min read
Got fired 3 times! Cleaning team driver sued "employment relationship exists" Huatan Township Office lost all three trials
Law·

Got fired 3 times! Cleaning team driver sued "employment relationship exists" Huatan Township Office lost all three trials

Zheng Nan, a cleaning team driver at the Huatan Township Office, was employed more than 20 years ago and was fired three times from 2019 to 2024. Regarding the third dismissal in September 2024, the Supreme Court rejected the township office’s appeal at the end of October and ruled that Zheng Nan won the case and should be reinstated and paid the salary during the dismissal period. The Supervisory Yuan corrected the township office in February 2025, finding that its frequent punishments and dismissals violated the principle of proportionality and procedural legitimacy and harmed labor rights.

自由时报
2 min read
Sentence for sharing half a sleeping pill! The third chief nursing officer was dismissed and the court ordered re-discipline
Law·

Sentence for sharing half a sleeping pill! The third chief nursing officer was dismissed and the court ordered re-discipline

A nursing officer surnamed Ye from the Tri-Service General Hospital was found guilty of transferring level 4 drugs for providing sleeping pills for personal use to friends. The military decided to remove him from his post and suspend his appointment for three years. The Supreme Administrative Court believed that the military did not consider the circumstances of the case and regarded dismissal as the minimum punishment, violating the principle of proportionality. It revoked the original sanction and ordered the Third General Administration to impose another appropriate sanction. The entire case was confirmed.

自由时报
3 min read
More on this topicTainan Prison